|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
Topic: | Excellent Idea for Remote Controls! This thread has 145 replies. Displaying posts 31 through 45. |
|
Post 31 made on Tuesday February 11, 2003 at 20:09 |
JohnY2050 Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | June 2002 230 |
|
|
I'm laughing sooo hard at this thread. Its great!! I just folded some scotch tape so its double sided, glued four popcicle sticks together, reinforced them with paper clips, and taped my 6 remotes to it. Works like a champ. It looks great on my coffee table. Who cares it spans the width of the table.
|
|
Post 32 made on Tuesday February 11, 2003 at 20:49 |
RWI Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 592 |
|
|
Spiky, I have 2 reasons for having 3 MX-500's, 1. I have 2 home theatre rooms plus a bedroom with a lot of equipment. 2. Is I have a wife and 2 kids, having the same remote in all of the rooms makes it simple for everyone to operate
This message was edited by RWI on 02/11/03 21:06.
|
|
Post 33 made on Tuesday February 11, 2003 at 23:55 |
Brett DiMichele Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 296 |
|
|
Edmund,
Does it matter what remote I have? If I had a HTM I would mention that as many times as need be, because it is a real solution to the problem at hand. The Pronto line of remote is as good as they come (as are many of the other universals) and well worth mentioning IMHO.
Do you think it would matter if I had a Pronto 2000 that I would mention it less? They are fantastic remotes, all of these aftermarket programable remotes are indeed fantastic timesavers.
|
|
Post 34 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 00:34 |
edmund Elite Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2002 13,841 |
|
|
You're right, it doesn't matter what remote you have, this thing he's selling would still be a piece of junk.
|
|
Post 35 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 01:16 |
Brett DiMichele Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 296 |
|
|
|
Post 36 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 02:35 |
senn Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2002 25 |
|
|
On 02/11/03 18:33, Jay In Chicago said...
My frind has a receiver remote that's about 5"wide - 3/4" thick, and 14"long.
He's really attached to it because everyone thinks it's funny. (It's a POS remote)
When it finally ceases to work he can make a little end table out of it to put his new remote on. and maybe a drink and a lamp. Got me thinking about my remote situation. I have an old sony vcr remote... it's a dinosaur but i would love to make a little piece of furniture (kramer's coffee table book on coffe tables). I love duct tape and rubber bands as much as the next guy but if this POS is anything more than a joke...... to each his/her own. good luck add your's to the birth of innonvations [Link: modellbahnott.com]
|
|
Post 37 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 02:57 |
Brett DiMichele Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 296 |
|
|
So Eric,
At the very least tell us who the girl is holding your contraption (innovation). Is she available? Does she like guys with big color remotes? =)
If that's your girl you are lucky dawg! :)
|
|
Post 38 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 03:34 |
Brett DiMichele Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 296 |
|
|
I was reading and I was thinking (Yeap, that gets me into trouble) I quote from whe web site... This type of hi-tech “Universal” remote controls also has problems:
1. It can be easily lost just like any other remote control 2. Takes a long time to program all your remotes into one 3. Could be pretty expensive, in particular the ones with LCDs 4. Easy to damage especially if it is dropped on the floor 5. Not simple to use when switching between different devices 6. Software imbedded into the remotes could crash any time 7. Simply cannot replace all the features of the original remotes
Now, it shows a picture of a Phillips Pronto Neo on the site but it is a "general" statement. So I have to look at these three specific claims: 5. Not simple to use when switching between different devices. (Not Simple according to whom?) 6. Software imbedded into the remotes could crash any time. (This one here could be perceived as slander against any company that makes a software driven remote and unless you can prove this to be true you could be "liable" for slander.) 7. Simply cannot replace all the features of the original remotes. (For some universal remotes this may be true but this holds no water against "all" universal remotes)
|
|
Post 39 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 09:31 |
Anthony Ultimate Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2001 28,878 |
|
|
Brett, looks a bit familiar [Link: remotecentral.com] :-) it is obvious he probably got a crappie universal remote that did not work, and decided all universals are the same. But if anyone likes his idea, then all they need to do is go to the hardware store and get a 2x4 and some sticky Velcro and his done.
|
... |
|
Post 40 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 09:38 |
Anthony Ultimate Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2001 28,878 |
|
|
Just to add to the funny things
1) he thinks any one smart enough to come here and read some posts would actually be interested in it
2) he thinks none of us knows he is the one trying to sell this junk.
|
... |
|
Post 41 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 10:28 |
johnneeukca Long Time Member |
|
|
So I guess his sales aren't gonna be as good as he first thought. But I've got another idea for an invention for you: 1) You take a belt (any kind will do, but preferably one of those old John Wayne models with the fake cartridge holes 'round the back), 2) take a cereal box, and cut it to desired shape. 3) take some double sided tape and fold into shape that will wrap around Univeral Remote (Pronto, Rav, MX, whatever). 4) attach to belt. Voila, you're very own Remote Control holster. Fantastic! You could even carry it to work and show all your friends. And, let's face it, even if your firends do think you're a bit strange, you'll never lose your remote. On sale now only at www.bunch-o-uselesscrap.com. Later J
|
|
Post 42 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 10:31 |
goodnf Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2002 1,744 |
|
|
I'm saving up my money to buy the Ultimate remote, being developed by MrKlaatu: [Link: remotecentral.com](I think that's why we haven't heard from him in a while.)
|
I'm just a sheep in wolf's clothing... |
|
Post 43 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 11:16 |
Jay In Chicago Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 1,658 |
|
|
Name that remote!
OK I went back to see this "girl" you guys are talking about... Not bad. Not bad at all. In fact a good diversion from what can only be called a very low tech innovation. I can't say there's not a customer base for such an item, I just know that it's not any of my customers, nor is it anybody of sound mind.
The girl... I doubt she uses the remote caddy, but who knows.
I took a closer look to see what devices were actually laid out for control, and I'm having trouble identifying the rightmost remote. (looking at them from the user position)
At first I was trying to see what the putty remote was for?? A computer remote perhaps? Nope.. An Aiwa... Quality... Are Aiwa users of sound mind?
Anyhow... What's one next to it? I looks like it could be an old single CD player but who's? Then again.. It also looks like a garage door opener?
Left to right. DVD - VCR - Toshiba Dish DVD - GE... "were not just washing machines!" Dish Aiwa - But what from Aiwa? So few buttons to be anything major And then the mystery remote... Perhaps for CD operation.
All and all one of the most powerful remote setups ever seen.
|
Jet Rack ... It's what's for breakfast |
|
Post 44 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 13:49 |
Spiky Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2001 2,288 |
|
|
The only remote I've seen that loses memory is an OEM sat STB remote from RCA with some universal codes in it at my parents' house. It constantly loses the codes for their Panny TV/VCR combo, which is a pain since I'm the only one who can figure out how to make it work with the stupid combo unit.
I've never seen a real universal remote that lost its memory. As an example: The HTM SL-9000 manual claims the memory will be retained for 1 year with no batteries, up to 10 years with dead batteries still in it. Shouldn't be a problem. ;-)
So I guess that's another reason to use a universal, they aren't cheap crap like the OEM remotes!! (I haven't even bothered to mention the insanely cheap remote that came with my Chinese DVDp, universal over that one any day)
|
|
Post 45 made on Wednesday February 12, 2003 at 13:53 |
Spiky Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2001 2,288 |
|
|
On 02/11/03 20:49, RWI said...
Spiky, I have 2 reasons for having 3 MX-500's, 1. I have 2 home theatre rooms plus a bedroom with a lot of equipment. 2. Is I have a wife and 2 kids, having the same remote in all of the rooms makes it simple for everyone to operate Yes, but this thread is pointed at one room only, so only one should matter for the discussion, IMO. The original comment sounded like Mr. Marketer thought you'd have 3 in the same room, hardly necessary unless you have A LOT of equipment. I will probably add a 2nd MX-500 myself for our 2nd room, as well.
|
|
|
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|