You guys crack me up.

The "downloads of Darnitol's files show that you are in the minority".

261 "amazing ccf" downloads and 426 of the 2nd beatiful ccf is alot? Daniels has nearly 7000 downloads. Do the math Darnitol, it is your and your dillusional views that are in the minority, I am in the vast majority. I would bet that you and the little rascals accounted for at least 150 of those downloads yourselves.

"Sorry to blast you because I genuinely feel bad about criticizing your ccf."

I was being cynical, look it up.

"And you are even slandering Daniel's name by insinuating that he was lieing when he called Darnitol's CCF "Amazing"."

Now it is you who is slandering. I said he was being polite, I never said he was lieing. Stop spreading false truths.

Hey GregoriousM: I DON'T WANT YOU ON THIS SITE EITHER, SO YOU GET OUTTA HERE! Think shouting it will get either one of us to leave. I don't think so, so live with my comments or turn off your pentium 1. Nothing I have said has been out of line or vulgar in any way, it is my opinion so live with it or leave.

John: I am happy you like Darnitols work, that is your right and opinion and I respect that. It is unfortunate that you cannot respect the fact that I do not feel his ccf can compare to Daniels.

"The fact that you don't like his work means absolutely nothing to anyone other than yourself."

The fact that you DO like his work means absolutely nothing to anyone other than YOURSELF either. So I guess we agree on at least one point.

I can completely respect that. But when you choose to describe his work as a "pile of crap," that's what I can't respect at all.


My point was that maybe you should just keep your opinions to yourself from now on, because it's pretty obvious that nobody wants to hear them. Yes, you ARE in the minority of ONE here. I don't see anyone agreeing with you, do you?

WOW! Talk about delusional!

John: The pile of crap comment came AFTER your comment not before so, you should have respected my opinons prior to that comment.

The fact that no one publicly agrees with me means nothing. After the clam bake you guys are giving me, who else would bother. I have thick skin, most people would rather just stay on the sidelines.

In fact John, your ccf, which was released months after Dales, has been downloaded more than 5 times as many times, so your opinon of his work is also in the minority.

You're wrong, Beever. Go back and look again. Your "pile of crap" comment is what prompted me to write what I did.

I'm not sure where you're looking, but I'm not specifically talking about Dale's ProntoPro CCFs, which were uploaded on March 13, I'm talking about his work as a whole. If you look at the list of top downloads of all time, you'll see one of his CCFs at #15, and most of the files higher up on the list aren't even CCFs.

Can we agree to disagree? I think we all had enough, and I think any other discussion should be handled by private e-mail.

What was at first glance a simple question, admittedly with some poorly chosen words, is now a flame throwing contest. I for one, would love to see this thread just fade away, and let it pass.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, which others may or may not share, but that's why it is an opinion.

And that's MY opinion. (Which you may or may not agree with)

JJP

john: your post is the most appropriate so far. I will no longer contribute to this thread and hopefully it will fade away.

JJP, if all we were dealing with were "opinions" in this thread, there would not have been a problem. Unfortunately, beever's "poorly chosen words" were blatant insults to just about everyone who's ever uploaded a CCF to this site, and they just got more insulting as the thread progressed. I, for one, don't think such behavior should be tolerated.

And that's MY opinion.

I'm all done missing the Beaver now...

John P:

I hear your opinion that this thread should go away. And it will when its time is up.

I always email someone privately when they email me privately. But when someone posts in public, I reply in public.

If Beever wants to email me in private, then that is where it will go. Until then, he will receive replies from me in public.

Personally, I agree with John C's opinion.

... Greg

JJP I for one agree with you 100%.

I agree that such behavior should not be tolerated, but I also think, for the most part, we have stated this.

To continue to respond to (to borrow a poorly chosen word here) kidnergarden (sp?) comments, I think only condones this behavior. I would think one comment on the subject would suffice.

But again that's only my opinion.

JJP

Yes folks, let's let this thread die. Beever proved that he's incapable of apologizing for his rudeness with his response to my post. Personally, I choose to treat others with respect, even when I disagree with them. Such behavior is clearly beyond our friend here. Even when faced with the opportunity to stand as a man, he chose to slither.

As I suggested, his narcissism apparently runs so deep that he truly believes that his opinion represents what the rest of the world is thinking, even when they assert otherwise. And despite multiple clarifications, he stll refuses to understand that I never disgreed with his opinion of my or any other CCF. I only disagreed with his manner.

So Beever, you win. However you choose to retort, whether by polluting us with your personality, or by laughing in your silence, I give you the last word. At least it will be the last word about this from me.

You win. And by winning, you lose, though you'll never know how, nor how much you've lost. Enjoy the world you live in.

Have a good day, sir.

Dale