Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Headhones for TV... Bluetooth???
This thread has 16 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 19:40
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
I have two jobs where I need to provide headphones for television viewing.  One is a new project and the second is retrofit into an existing install.

In the past I've used Sennheiser RF headphones connected to AVR or TV out, but wondering if something like a bluetooth transmitter might be a better solution.

It's a total of three TVs.  One has local AVR and sources in cabinet below with conduit path to TV... the other two televisions are connected to equipment in racks 100ft+ away.

Setting up the traditional Sennheiser RF headphones with charging base isn't really an option for the two TVs distributed from the rack because they're both just TVs and soundbars on the wall with no furniture below for the headphone charger/transmitter.

TVs have USB and analog audio out + toslink audio out... not positive if the analog audio out is fixed or variable (or user selectable) so was thinking about maybe a USB powered Bluetooth transmitter.

Cost isn't really an issue, but operation has to be bullet-proof.

I did some forum searches and most posts were a couple years old and talked about bluetooth transmitters that shut down when idle or if power is lost and required pressing a button to turn back on/pairing issues.

Does anyone have a solution they've tested and found to work well?
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
OP | Post 2 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 20:15
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
Forgot to mention that latency will be an issue because there will be times where clients are watching TV together with one spouse using headphones and the other spouse listening over speakers.

In this situation latency won't just create lip sync issues, but would also cause an echo effect for the viewer listening through headphones.

I don't have any experience with Bluetooth headphones... are all BT transmitters prone to latency and if so how bad is it?
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
Post 3 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 20:35
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
Sennheiser MM550X sounds like the right item for the headphone end, just need to find a reliable sending unit, and that may be the issue.

But, I do believe that distance can be a serious issue with BT.




Anyway to send the audio signal to a bedside table, or whatnot, where the sending unit/charging base and the headphones could reside.

Seems like that would be the easiest way to make this work reliably.
OP | Post 4 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 20:48
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
The more I'm reading about BT it sounds like it might be a no-go due to latency.  I've read about APTX which reduces latency to around 100ms, but that's still going to be good enough.

My previous go-to solution was the Sennheiser Set840 which looks like it's still available, but not really sure how I'd wire to the base station for the two TVs without any furniture under them.

I have conduit paths back to the rack from both TVs so I could extend analog audio back to the rack, but then headphones will be out of range from the transmitters and transmitter/base really needs to be in the room to make it convenient for charging the headphones.

There's no way to get wire from the TV to another area in the viewing room at the existing job, but I could pre-wire analog wiring for the other job.

Bluetooth seems like such a simple and elegant solution until you bring up audio delay and transmitter & pairing reliability issues.

Budget is probably up to $1k per TV, but it has to work all the time, every time.  Not the type of clients that are willing to mess around pressing buttons to power transmitters back on or re-pair BT headphones.
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
Post 5 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 20:57
Fritz Thomas
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
123
I use the Bose noise cancelling 350 headphones with a Miccus Bluetooth transmitter. The sound is good and I haven't noticed any latency coming fixed audio analog out of a Sony tv. Might just be lucky.
Post 6 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 22:48
IRkiller
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2012
920
Don't know if it applies here but in these cases we have used a zone out off of the audio matrix (in our case it's 100% the Zektor proaudio 16). The headphones themselves are like their own "zone" straight from the matrix out to the transmitter. If there is any latency, the built-in delay adjustments (on the lip-sync model) will accommodate for that. Output level adjustments too, etc. +1 on the Sennheiser RF units. We've used Sony too.
how in the hell does ernie make money?
OP | Post 7 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 23:02
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
On August 27, 2016 at 20:57, Fritz Thomas said...
I use the Bose noise cancelling 350 headphones with a Miccus Bluetooth transmitter. The sound is good and I haven't noticed any latency coming fixed audio analog out of a Sony tv. Might just be lucky.

I looked at specs/facts from the Bose website and they specifically state the bluetooth headphones aren't recommended for TV because of the delay.

From the Bose website facts section:
Do these headphones work with my TV? Would they work with a Bluetooth transmitter?
 
no. many tvs do not have wireless bluetooth functionality. although a transmitter will technically work, the experience does not meet bose expectations. there will be a distracting delay between the audio and video that detracts from the experience.

I also checked out the Miccus transmitter and some reviews state there is a delay and others say there isn't so a little conflicting.

Good to know that you've had good results, but I'm still skeptical and would probably need to purchase the headphones/transmitter to test.  
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
OP | Post 8 made on Saturday August 27, 2016 at 23:07
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
On August 27, 2016 at 22:48, IRkiller said...
Don't know if it applies here but in these cases we have used a zone out off of the audio matrix (in our case it's 100% the Zektor proaudio 16). The headphones themselves are like their own "zone" straight from the matrix out to the transmitter. If there is any latency, the built-in delay adjustments (on the lip-sync model) will accommodate for that. Output level adjustments too, etc. +1 on the Sennheiser RF units. We've used Sony too.

The analog audio source isn't really the issue here, but getting analog audio (or digital audio) to the right place is.  I'm trying to find a solution for the rooms where there isn't a cabinet under the TV to place the headphone charger base/transmitter.

Bluetooth seemed easy because I could stick a small transmitter on the back of the TV connected to analog audio out and powered by USB and then client could store and charge Bluetooth headphones anywhere convenient... just don't think Bluetooth is going to cut it because of audio delay and possible unreliability of transmitter device.

The Sennheiser/Sony RF headphones would be an easy solution if I had a place to put the transmitter/charger base.
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
Post 9 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 00:40
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
I'm loathe to suggest this but.....

[Link: monoprice.com]



If not this POS, I wonder if some other similar item might work. Wireless stereo to the wireless headphone base station.

I think it'd be worth some throw away money to try it and see if it actually worked.


Then there's this: [Link: idjnow.com]
Post 10 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 10:37
Brad Humphrey
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
2,598
The Sennheiser RS160.

1) The TX160 RF transmitter base is small & compact. Can easily fit behind TV.
2) You can have up to 4 of the HDR160 headphones paired to it. Sound quality is good and it's a closed headphone design, so keeps sound isolated.
3) Headphones plug into a charger. The Sennheiser factory setup is with a detachable 2way power splitter for the headphones & RF base. You can order a 2nd power supply (or any 5V supply w/4mm plug) to power RF base separate.

Cons:
1) Uses 2.4GHz channels, so need to have clear bands. If this is in an intensely RF congested area, may have problems.
2) If you do want to have more than 1 headphone listening at the same time, user has to have access to the RF base station. And a series of button pushes has to happen.

[Link: en-us.sennheiser.com]
OP | Post 11 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 12:24
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
Hi Brad,

I'd have to check power draw, but might be able to power the transmitter behind the TV from USB jack on television since it's 5vdc.

I don't think there will be a need for multiple headphones at one TV, but one property will have headphones at two different TVs.  I looked through the website and didn't see that there was a way to individually address/pair headphone to base station but your comment about pushing buttons to setup multiple headphones to a single base makes me think this might be possible.

Do you know if two of these units can be used in close proximity and not interfere with each other?

Both are large estate properties so not a concern about RF interference from neighbors, but both have Panasonic phone systems with portable stations running at 2.4Ghz.
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
Post 12 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 13:18
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
I understand the RS160 has been discontinued, although you can still find them all over the place.

But:

As I said, the transmitter WILL shut down, and it requires a button push to get it going. I know this for a fact, since I have that set at home, and I installed a set at my in-laws.

The only thing I don't care for is where the volume control is, and how easy it is to hit the wrong button so you turn the things off, instead of raising, or lowering the volume.
Post 13 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 16:15
Brad Humphrey
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
2,598
Yes, you can use multi units in the same area.

Might can run RF base from a USB port, depends on the amperage needed.

Have them upgrade their cordless phones. Most modern cordless phones are DECT6.0 1.9GHz. Less interference and better range for the phone too.

Haven't heard the RS160 being discontinued yet. Doesn't say EOL with Sennheiser. You can also pair other Sennheiser headphones with KLEER technology to that TX160 RF base station.

I agree the power button on the HDR160 headphones, is in a stupid place (right between the vol +/-). Takes some getting use to. That could be a problem for large fingers or older people named Ken  :lol:

Was not aware of the power time out. Since the power button is right on the front, top, edge - seems easy enough to have the base velcro'd in place, at the bottom edge of the TV. Where customer can just walk up and blindly touch the power button to come on (assuming the TV isn't mounted to high).
Or mounted on the wall just below or side of the TV, where the button can be easily reached but still wired easily to the TV.
Post 14 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 18:29
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
I've just been through this scenario and earned more battle scares than I want to admit. No matter,what you try, Bluetooth will end up with a delay. I tried all Options, and tried and tried to find a way to make the client's provided Bose headphones work. In the end, it's not possible. I have a sennhiezer 2.4 ghz set on the way. Will the 2.4 ghz fix the problem? I don't know, but that's what yhammy tech support said to do
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 15 made on Sunday August 28, 2016 at 20:14
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
I don't notice any sync issue with my 160's.
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse