 |
 |
|
|
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
|
|
 |
|
10/10/25 - It’s been so long since we’ve last seen you!
10/24/22 - In searching for the perfect day, Timmy discovers something unexpected!
|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | DVD Coax or optical This thread has 7 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
| Post 1 made on January 10, 2002 at 20:52 |
Mark Chirgwin Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 32 |
|
|
Can someone please explain if I would get any advantages running an optical instead of coaxial signal to my DVD. I have a Pioneeer DVD-09 and a Lex MC-1. Please give me some kind of explanation as to which and why I should use. Thanks, Mark
|
|
| Post 2 made on January 10, 2002 at 21:24 |
|
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 1,802 |
|
|
Well, it really is kinda a mute point. The signals you are sending are a digital bitstream. Pretty much impervious to noise induction anyway. But, I guess logically the optical cable would have 'less' possible noise induction of it's inherant design. I've never heard a difference in the two cable types, nor have I heard any difference in cable quality....to a certain extent, I mean a good cable is necessary, but 100 bucks a meter is nuts.
|
|
| Post 3 made on January 11, 2002 at 09:26 |
|
Joined: Posts: | November 2001 726 |
|
|
I have heard that you can sometimes get an unreliable connection with the optical cable and that co-ax is more secure, but other than that the signals ahould be identical.
|
How hard can this be? |
|
| Post 4 made on January 11, 2002 at 15:35 |
Graham Norbury Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 4 |
|
|
"Pretty much impervious to noise induction anyway" Ever heard of Jitter or Bit Error Rate (BER)? Digital signals aren't impervious to noise, its just that you may not notice because the error detection/correction algorithms will tend to filter it out. From what I've learned about the two standards, the coaxial link uses a significantly higher carrier frequency than the optical link, so theoretically at least it should provide a "better" signal. In practice, I think you'd be hard pressed to notice any difference even with high end audiophile gear. Graham
|
|
| Post 5 made on January 11, 2002 at 17:58 |
|
Joined: Posts: | January 2002 17 |
|
|
Graham is certainly correct. Optical signals are also much more susceptible to cable length, and in fact because the carrier frequency is lower, the wavelength is longer and optimal cable lengths are also longer (about 2 meters). A better optical connection was introduced several years ago (ATT glass) but never really caught on except in very high end equipment. John
|
|
| OP | Post 6 made on January 12, 2002 at 05:07 |
Mark Chirgwin Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 32 |
|
|
Thanks for all the information, I know when I first set up the system I was tod to use coax but never given a reason. Thanks Again, Mark
|
|
| Post 7 made on January 12, 2002 at 05:16 |
Bruce Hartley Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2001 397 |
|
|
I have also heard that the connectors that are used on optical cables tend to introduce a lot of reflections/noise/loss. Regards, Bruce
|
|
| Post 8 made on January 12, 2002 at 23:08 |
|
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 1,802 |
|
|
Well, I would call them errors rather than noise induction...but so be it. Then again, with all that error correction, are there still errors???
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
|
|
|