Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 4 of 5
Topic:
When do we, as an industry, tell the manufacturers that HDMI should be replaced?
This thread has 67 replies. Displaying posts 46 through 60.
Post 46 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 09:49
Mac Burks (39)
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2007
17,519
On September 22, 2016 at 07:14, jrainey said...
Well I would say that that experience is certainly not indicative of the industry as a whole. Just check the threads here and on IP from integrators large and small with many years of experience.....HDMI as a whole for the vast majority of us has been a huge time suck.

Do you think it would be worthwhile for me to do a few videos to show you guys how not to suck so much time with hdmi?
Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps
Post 47 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 10:39
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
Mac, I think he means a screen that is solid pink.

On September 22, 2016 at 08:00, highfigh said...
What do you mean, "manufactured cables"? It's not as if we can make them in the field.

I wondered that, too. Good answer.

In my case, I have had 3' cables stop sending video, only showing a pink screen when NetFlix was selected on different Roku boxes and one was mine. I changed the cables after disconnecting and rebooting, but the only thing that fixed it was a new cable. Others were all in client systems and I have also seen a few ends break off from almost no stress. Some have been in racks with the cables laced to the rear edge of the shelves and nobody touches that equipment.

I've never seen a connector break off. "No stress"? That's hard to believe.

From a structural standpoint, the easiest way to cause a physical failure is by using a wide and thin end that inserts only a short distance, with no easy way to secure it and then, compound the problem by not making the cable so it's flexible. Pushing the equipment into a cabinet that isn't deep enough when there's no possibility of guiding the cables as it moves back guarantees a failure of some kind. How many times have we seen a stiff cable that causes a DVD/BD player that weighs a whopping 6 ounces (or an AppleTV, Roku, etc) slide forward when it's set in place?

This tells me that Mac doesn't allow this kind of situation. From what I've seen of photos he has provided, he's in control of the mounting situation. Few of us are.

They could have used a round connector- that's inherently stronger than a wide, flat one. It could have been narrower and it wouldn't require any more space, but they could be staggered if the rear panel becomes too crowded. A small locking tab could be used, like the one that was on some DIN plugs or an XLR.

Bingo.

I haven't used many extenders because I haven't needed them in most of the work I do. The first time, I bought one from Spectrum, which is Jeff Boccaccio's company (he's one of the people in the HDMI consortium and writes a column in a trade mag). The instructions for termination showed a diagram with uneven wire ends in the RJ45 with 'Bad JuJu' and another that showed even ends with 'Good JuJu'. The wires are paired by color, rather than using 568A or B, which makes it necessary to re-terminate in the event of an extender failure and no replacement of the same type is available.

This is really pretty stupid. First, there's a HUGE base of cables connected per 568; second, everyone who uses CAT cable is used to connecting that way; third, if wire length has anything to do with the connection layout choice, that choice won't give consistent results because nothing about the pair twist spec says which colors should get which amount of twist. It only says* that crosstalk should be minimized and the manufacturers do that by using different twist rates, choosing which colors get which amount of twist.

I understand that the traces need to be the same length for this to work, but they could have addressed that internally.

Traces? You mean PC board traces? How is this addressed OTHER than internally?

To make it worse, it didn't work, even though the cables were inserted so the ends were aligned evenly across the front edge. I re-terminated them and it did nothing to help.

And this shows part of the problem with HDMI: when it doesn't work, all the possible causes are present with every failure. Does it maybe have a bad crimp connection? Lop off the one you've got an make a new one, which is now a new place that might be bad in exactly the same way.

It has no way to adjust the level of the signal and all I could do to make the video show up consistently is reduce the resolution to 720p on a Panasonic V-series plasma TV. Set to 1080, it flashed a wide black border and rectangle of video "snow" and the sound would cut out in synch with a Denon AVR and Panasonic BD player ahead of the TV, which was 40' from the rest of the equipment (line of sight)- the path I had created with my conduit in the basement was around 65', which was too long for HDMI cables at the time without using a coupler and connecting two cables, which I was NOT going to do. Ironically, I received a "Get a free HDMI extender if you call us to talk about our products" card from SnapAV the same day I connected the extender and unfortunately, It was too late to return the Spectrum model. I called, they sent the extender, I re-terminated the cables (it uses 568B) and it worked the first time, without having to make any changes to the resolution or the control on the extender. I have done nothing to that system WRT video issues since I installed it over 5 years ago. I have changed the remote, added a DVD player for internationally-sourced videos for the local Film Festival (she's on the board) and that's all.

Experience says you were lucky.





*no, I have not read the spec. I'm sort of in the position of a 12th century Catholic trying to talk about Christianity: I've heard talk from those who can read the information, and all I can do is extrapolate from that.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 48 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 11:13
Stryker
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2010
402
I think a factor why we may all be viewing this subject a little differently is because of Quantity, I think my perspective is scewed because I only do a few projects a year, When your only doing a dozen higher end projects a year the opportunity for failure is much less than if your doing 100 installs a year.

That being said my experience is like Mac's very few issues over the years and when there has been an issue it has been a concrete issue, ( a bad cable, balun, receiver etc)

I read the frustration that many others share and the long complicated troubleshooting processes used, I take notes and do my very best to avoid situations that look similar to where others have had issues
"If they give you ruled paper, write the other way"
Post 49 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 11:26
Mac Burks (39)
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2007
17,519
On September 22, 2016 at 10:39, Ernie Gilman said...
Mac, I think he means a screen that is solid pink.

I wondered that, too. Good answer.

I don't think it was a good question/answer. I know some of us here like to focus on spelling and grammar but i think a little bit of effort needs to be directed at reading and comprehension.

In my post i didn't just say "manufactured cables" i said...



I mentioned manufactured cables...



Extenders...



My multiple choice response covers every way i know to get wired HDMI from source to display. I don't think that anyone in this industry should be able to read that sentence and wonder what i meant by "manufactured cables". But...this might explain why so many have issues with such a simple and stable technology like HDMI.
Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps
Post 50 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 12:18
Mac Burks (39)
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2007
17,519
On September 22, 2016 at 09:49, Mac Burks (39) said...
Do you think it would be worthwhile for me to do a few videos to show you guys how not to suck so much time with hdmi?

I had some extra time this morning so i put together the first episode of HDMI school for you guys. This is the first tutorial video i have ever done so please bear with me. I didn't have time for a custom intro graphic so i sketched something out. Hopefully each video gets a little better until at some point they closely resemble a professional video course. I think these will be a great asset that is clearly needed by so many.

Hopefully everyone can see this embedded vimeo video. If not click this link [Link: vimeo.com] to watch at vimeo.com


HDMI 101 from guijaboard on Vimeo.

Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps
Post 51 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 14:22
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On September 22, 2016 at 11:26, Mac Burks (39) said...
I don't think it was a good question/answer. I know some of us here like to focus on spelling and grammar but i think a little bit of effort needs to be directed at reading and comprehension.

Equally, attention needs to be paid to clear writing.

In my post i didn't just say "manufactured cables" i said...
I mentioned manufactured cables...
Extenders...
My multiple choice response covers every way i know to get wired HDMI from source to display.

Yes, you did. But the second item in a list should not make the reader go "oh, I see what he's talking about." Each term should stand on its own.

This is real: There's a mid-80s product labeled "Video Switcher." Its instructions might read "To use this video switcher, start by connecting your sources and displays to the F connectors on the back of the unit."

See, it's NOT a video switcher, it's an RF switcher, but the initial term was not complete and definitive all on its own. You read Video Switcher, but then later find it's NOT a video switcher.

If you had even listed the same components, but put them as
Extenders and manufactured cables

it would have been more clear. I still think they should have been called "HDMI cables."

I don't think that anyone in this industry should be able to read that sentence and wonder what I meant by "manufactured cables".

We simply don't call them that, so when you do, you raise a question and progress grinds to a halt. This is similar to the quotation marks in the title at [Link: remotecentral.com]. Julie was just quoting someone else, but even there, why did someone else use the quotation marks?

But...this might explain why so many have issues with such a simple and stable technology like HDMI.

Even if you read a rabid proponent of HDMI like Jeff Boccaccio, you will find references to possible and likely problems with HDMI. He has tested many HDMI products and found them lacking... from there, how can it EVER be stated that your luck with HDMI should be typical?
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 52 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 14:49
Mac Burks (39)
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2007
17,519
On September 22, 2016 at 14:22, Ernie Gilman said...
Equally, attention needs to be paid to clear writing.

Yes, you did. But the second item in a list should not make the reader go "oh, I see what he's talking about." Each term should stand on its own.

This is real: There's a mid-80s product labeled "Video Switcher." Its instructions might read "To use this video switcher, start by connecting your sources and displays to the F connectors on the back of the unit."

If you were a librarian or a fire fighter i could see how this would be confusing. If you are an audio video technician you should understand that label with no issue. If you are an audio video technician and that statement does confuse you...i think its safe to say that you will also have issues with basic HDMI wiring and possibly tying your shoes.

A more confusing term in that example is the use of the word "switcher". Does it really switch signals? Or does it actually route signals? Or are the routed signals switched? Or possibly the switched signals routed?

See, it's NOT a video switcher, it's an RF switcher, but the initial term was not complete and definitive all on its own. You read Video Switcher, but then later find it's NOT a video switcher.

If you had even listed the same components, but put them as
it would have been more clear. I still think they should have been called "HDMI cables."

We simply don't call them that, so when you do, you raise a question and progress grinds to a halt. This is similar to the quotation marks in the title at [Link: remotecentral.com]. Julie was just quoting someone else, but even there, why did someone else use the quotation marks?

Even if you read a rabid proponent of HDMI like Jeff Boccaccio, you will find references to possible and likely problems with HDMI. He has tested many HDMI products and found them lacking... from there, how can it EVER be stated that your luck with HDMI should be typical?

I think your problem is that you consider my seasoned exceptional expertise to be "Luck". I used quotation marks on either side of the word luck in that last sentence to make the reader of this paragraph aware that i was quoting the words that you typed in your paragraph earlier when you were responding to my earlier comment in this thread. Hopefully i included enough information about my use of the word Luck and the quotation marks on either side of it.
Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps
OP | Post 53 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 15:08
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On September 22, 2016 at 09:47, Mac Burks (39) said...
I mean packaged HDMI cable vs an extender being used.

If you see a pink screen when netflix is selected it might be that your red needs color adjustment. Did you see the netflix logo in the pink screen?

The pink didn't show up immediately, it took time and it was fine until the pink reared its ugly head. No logo, just a solid pink screen with a black border. Replacing the cables took care of the problem.
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
OP | Post 54 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 15:25
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On September 22, 2016 at 10:39, Ernie Gilman said...
Mac, I think he means a screen that is solid pink.

I've never seen a connector break off. "No stress"? That's hard to believe.

This tells me that Mac doesn't allow this kind of situation. From what I've seen of photos he has provided, he's in control of the mounting situation. Few of us are.

Bingo.

This is really pretty stupid. First, there's a HUGE base of cables connected per 568; second, everyone who uses CAT cable is used to connecting that way; third, if wire length has anything to do with the connection layout choice, that choice won't give consistent results because nothing about the pair twist spec says which colors should get which amount of twist. It only says* that crosstalk should be minimized and the manufacturers do that by using different twist rates, choosing which colors get which amount of twist.

Traces? You mean PC board traces? How is this addressed OTHER than internally?

And this shows part of the problem with HDMI: when it doesn't work, all the possible causes are present with every failure. Does it maybe have a bad crimp connection? Lop off the one you've got an make a new one, which is now a new place that might be bad in exactly the same way.

Experience says you were lucky.

*no, I have not read the spec. I'm sort of in the position of a 12th century Catholic trying to talk about Christianity: I've heard talk from those who can read the information, and all I can do is extrapolate from that.

I wrote 'almost no stress'- it took so little I was amazed. The metal shell basically fell off and the plastic at the center wasn't able to handle the bending force, so that broke, too. It was a Monster, too. What a shock. No, really.

I avoid stressing cables when I know they won't survive it, so I bundle them in the position they need at the rear panel and if necessary, I use something to maintain that position, almost like a cable comb. If the piece of equipment is moved, the cables go with it without moving between the jacks and the point where they diverge. If the shelf isn't deep enough, I make sure to prevent lifting the HDMI cable (or pressing downward) because that direction is where it's most fragile.

I didn't know it didn't use 568 until I had it for too long to return it (thanks, ADI!). WRT traces, yes, circuit board traces and they can easily make them as long as needed by using plated feed-throughs and continuing the circuit on a double-sided board. I was told the colors are in adjacent pairs because the path length is supposed to be equal and I told them they were doing it in a way that's ridiculous. I had re-terminated both ends and since the source end is next to a network switch that was connected to the router, I did a speed test from the TV end and it came through without any problem.

I still have the Spectrum extender- wanna try it? I don't. Once I had success with the one from SnapAV, I moved on to the rest of the project and as I wrote, I have had zero problems with it since that time. Lucky? No, I know how to terminate cables. If one piece doesn't work and the other one does, it's defective or badly designed. In addition, the Snap piece only uses one Cat5e, where the other used two. Not impressed with Spectrum.
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
OP | Post 55 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 15:28
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On September 22, 2016 at 11:13, Stryker said...
I think a factor why we may all be viewing this subject a little differently is because of Quantity, I think my perspective is scewed because I only do a few projects a year, When your only doing a dozen higher end projects a year the opportunity for failure is much less than if your doing 100 installs a year.

That being said my experience is like Mac's very few issues over the years and when there has been an issue it has been a concrete issue, ( a bad cable, balun, receiver etc)

I read the frustration that many others share and the long complicated troubleshooting processes used, I take notes and do my very best to avoid situations that look similar to where others have had issues

I'm using my experience over the years since HDMI became a thorn in our sides and to me, reliable is more important than new, "better, best, improved, High Speed", etc. I don't give a rat's patoot what a marketing department is telling me, I want results that won't force me to waste time in troubleshooting a problem that shouldn't have occurred in the first place.
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
OP | Post 56 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 15:32
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On September 22, 2016 at 11:26, Mac Burks (39) said...
My multiple choice response covers every way i know to get wired HDMI from source to display. I don't think that anyone in this industry should be able to read that sentence and wonder what i meant by "manufactured cables". But...this might explain why so many have issues with such a simple and stable technology like HDMI.

Remember the HDMI cables that could be field-terminated, sold by Liberty? I do and that's the reason I asked. If we had been discussing anything with an RJ45, RCA, BNC or any other type of termination that we use on a regular basis, I think you may have included something like "...vs terminated on-site".

Have you used fiber HDMI yet?
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
OP | Post 57 made on Thursday September 22, 2016 at 15:34
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On September 22, 2016 at 14:22, Ernie Gilman said...
Even if you read a rabid proponent of HDMI like Jeff Boccaccio, you will find references to possible and likely problems with HDMI. He has tested many HDMI products and found them lacking... from there, how can it EVER be stated that your luck with HDMI should be typical?

And the ironic part is that Spectrum is Boccaccio's company.
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
Post 58 made on Friday September 23, 2016 at 09:49
andrewinboulder
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
1,518
Are you using extending products or is this all HDMI cables?

On that job it was a 50 ft Binary cable from an Onkyo AVR to a Sharp TV.

I have a grave yard of HDMI extenders in my office. Every single one of them have been units that worked great while I was on site, but then f&*ck up later, video drops out, require reboots etc, etc. A unit will work fine on one job site, so I make it my go-to and then it fails on another site.

I've tried Binary, Atlona, Hydraconnect, probably others I can't remember.

I finally started running conduit whenever humanly possible.

I had a remodel job a couple years ago, with three local systems, all of which had Key Digital HDMI matrix switches. I pulled conduit to all the TVs. I pulled moderately price Key Digital HDMI cables to all of the TV's. The longest run was about 75 ft. All the TV's worked while I was there, then they all started screwing up. Ended up pulling all new higher end Ethereal HDMI cables to every TV and they all worked from then on.

I have several budget jobs with Amazon 50 ft HDMI $40 cables that still work fine.

I think I might need some lasers.

Mac,
If you have a local system in a home, with an AVR, and only existing Cat5e to work with, and you have a 50-75 ft run between the AVR and TV, what is your go-to solution?
Post 59 made on Friday September 23, 2016 at 12:16
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
And on that last post, finally, I notice the name Ethereal.

In keeping with Mac's proofreading thoroughness, I'm not saying they weren't mentioned before this. I'm just saying this is the first time I noticed it.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 60 made on Friday September 23, 2016 at 12:23
osiris
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2004
442
I'm not qualified to speak for Mac, but for me, it would be a Leaf HDBT extender. Most of the projects I do are HDBT distribution, and very rarely do I use PTP products. I have probably deployed somewhere in the neighborhood of two dozen Leaf PTP kits, never had an issue yet.
Find in this thread:
Page 4 of 5


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse