10/10/25 - It’s been so long since we’ve last seen you!
10/24/22 - In searching for the perfect day, Timmy discovers something unexpected!
9/04/22 - That childhood favorite is back in a new Timmy video.
7/31/22 - It’s time for my second new Just Like Timmy video!
7/12/22 - Why not check out my new YouTube animation channel, Just Like Timmy!
|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | MX-3000 versions This thread has 11 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
| Post 1 made on June 2, 2005 at 05:16 |
|
Joined: Posts: | April 2002 475 |
|
|
Hi, I have just been offered an MX-3000 which says "MX. 3000 v.6.6" under the battery cover. Can someone tell me if this is relatively recent, and how much memory it has? Christopher
|
|
| Post 2 made on June 2, 2005 at 11:14 |
HappyWithURC Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2004 83 |
|
|
its pretty recent.....I beleive before the newest version of the 3000 was released, they were up to version 8 or close to that. I would say that your 6.6 version is roughly 3-5 months old....anyone correct me if im wrong...-pete
|
|
| Post 3 made on June 2, 2005 at 11:34 |
|
Joined: Posts: | June 2004 648 |
|
|
Well, my remote is roughly 3 months old and I have a v8.8. My first remote was a v1.0 which I happily upgraded from in favor of a newer version. It is my understanding though that as long as you have a v3.6 or newer you have the most current version of 'hardware'. (Brighter screen and 64MB of memory) All versions since this are just firmware/software updates, which are available via LiveUpdate. So even if you start with a 6.6, after performing a LiveUpdate and Sync you will have a seemingly identical remote to the newest version. -Bracken
|
Author of DMX-3000, Disc Managing Software for the MX-3000 Touchscreen http://www.triplebsoftware.com/ |
|
| Post 4 made on June 2, 2005 at 12:08 |
|
Joined: Posts: RC XP: | February 2004 643 42⭐︎ |
|
|
Bracken, the hardware part is not true. The latest version of the hardware has a redesigned charger base, two speakers in the hand grip area, and a standard mini USB port instead of the proprietary one on earlier versions. This new version was introduced early April '05. Dino
|
|
| Post 5 made on June 2, 2005 at 22:52 |
|
Joined: Posts: | June 2004 648 |
|
|
Well see there, I learned my new bit for the day. Obviously the v6.6 in question is older than this since my v8.8 is still of the proprietary style USB cable. What exactly changed in the charging cradle? I did notice that my new one doesnt require the remote being 'snapped' down. Thanks for the correction Dino, dont want to be giving out incorrect information, and always glad to learn something new. -Bracken
|
Author of DMX-3000, Disc Managing Software for the MX-3000 Touchscreen http://www.triplebsoftware.com/ |
|
| OP | Post 6 made on June 3, 2005 at 01:30 |
|
Joined: Posts: | April 2002 475 |
|
|
Cradle and USB I don't think I care about, but does the speaker number/placement have any material importance?
|
|
| Post 7 made on June 3, 2005 at 06:21 |
I have one of the older units with the one speaker, even with the volume cranked the loudest of wav files are weak - can't imagine why they even gave you the ability to turn them down. RobZ
|
|
|
| Post 8 made on June 3, 2005 at 06:34 |
|
Joined: Posts: RC XP: | February 2004 643 42⭐︎ |
|
|
Yes, I believe the new cradle design was introduced at version 8.8, but the new speaker configuration and USB cable are only on the latest ones (the newest ones don't have a version number, but a date code instead). Yes, the new unit's speakers sound fine. I don't have any problems hearing them and don't have to crank the sound up. Dino
|
|
| OP | Post 9 made on June 3, 2005 at 07:39 |
|
Joined: Posts: | April 2002 475 |
|
|
Too late, already bought the 6.6... It looks and feels fantastic, and I haven't done anything more than putting in the battery and placing it on the charger, Just the default first page looks spectacular compared to my old Marantz RC-9200! Now I can't wait until I buy one of the Guiwerx designs.....
|
|
| Post 10 made on November 22, 2005 at 06:39 |
wilso17aus Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2005 84 |
|
|
Hi, I have just got a version 8.8 MX-3000. Can anyone tell me how old this would be roughly? Have I got the new charger? With my charger you can sit the remote in it and it will start charging Lights come on etc), but you can also lightly push down on the front of remote and it will clip in? Im confused as to whether this is the new or old charger? Also would mine have the latest brightest screen? It appears that it has the old usb cable, and speaker under logo. Are there any other difference?
|
|
| Post 11 made on November 22, 2005 at 17:09 |
wilso17aus Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2005 84 |
|
|
|
| Post 12 made on November 22, 2005 at 18:15 |
|
Joined: Posts: | January 2005 440 |
|
|
Ver 8.8, I believe, was the last version before they stopped using numerical version numbers. The newer ones have designations like "N3". The 8.8 is supposed to have the same screen as the newer version. I use a 8.8 and the base and cable work just fine. I also have one of the newer ones. The bases look identical. The newer one lacks the little tab close to the electrical contacts so it does not snap into the base. Don't know why they changed from snap in to no snap in, but maybe it was confusing. Or there was a possibility the snap in sometimes was not done properly so the recharging contacts were not made. Also on the new, there are two little elongated openings (for speakers?) on either side, underneath in the hand grip areas.
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|