Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 2 of 3
Topic:
RTI vs. Savant
This thread has 39 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 30.
Post 16 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 12:52
internetraver
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
798
On April 7, 2020 at 12:05, punter16 said...
Our remotes typically take around 1.5 hours for programming and testing.

A big plus for other systems vs. RTI is that you program the "system", not each individual interface.

Savant programming time doesn't matter if you have 1 UI or 100 UI's, it's all the same amount of time (in 99% of jobs)
Post 17 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 14:08
RTI Vincent
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2017
40
Punter16 -

If you are programming and it's taking you some time, I highly recommend that you take a look at Integration Designer APEX. APEX has some great features for any business, allowing them to save their devices in what we call "bundles." That preserves all your programming, graphical placement, and special functionality so that you can use it each time. We illustrate a programmed system with bundles and it took about 10-15 minutes to program.

Each control system has advantages, and all of them are very good. RTI offers custom integration and being able to create the ideal client experience. There is no annual quota or major buy-in, and we have programming and design services. I have PM'd my phone number if you want to speak privately.

Also, we will be sending out invitations to our 6-week "APEX Online" course which will meet two days a week for 90-minute sessions starting on Tuesday, April 14th. I encourage you to join and check out APEX. I think we have a powerful platform with some pretty incredible features. After the first two or three courses, you will have a grasp of what it is all about and what it can offer your business.

Thanks,
Vincent
RTI Dealer Experience

Last edited by RTI Vincent on April 7, 2020 14:22.
Vincent Bova
RTI Dealer Experience Manager
Remote Technologies Inc.
Post 18 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 15:50
Cams
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2006
485
On April 7, 2020 at 06:59, mrtristan said...
I'm an ace programming with ID10 but Apex programming is complex and hard to grasp in my opinion. It's supposed to make it easier to program larger projects but it seems like people still have problems with it. I've tried a few times to program systems and went to the one day training they offered in my city. It wasn't enough and you have to spend some money for training in their facility. Maybe this is the time to spend more time on it. I would love to hear about others' experiences with going to Apex. What percentage of programmers are on it and is it worth the investment in time and money to switch?

ID is done. If you are doing RTI you need to learn APEX, its the future. Yea it sucks learning it (coming from ID) but once you learn it you will say how the hell did I use ID for so long.
The only time you should be using ID is to update older projects. Anything new is done in APEX.

RTI is offering an on-line class now, no expense to travel to MN.
Post 19 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 15:53
Cams
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2006
485
On April 7, 2020 at 12:52, internetraver said...
A big plus for other systems vs. RTI is that you program the "system", not each individual interface.

Savant programming time doesn't matter if you have 1 UI or 100 UI's, it's all the same amount of time (in 99% of jobs)

In APEX, they have bundles. You make your bundle for each device - IE: AppleTV for iPad, Sonos for a keypad or remote, etc.
When you start programming, just load up the bundle you need and you are DONE.

Bundle = Source+RTI Device+GUI
Post 20 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 18:11
buzz
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
4,382
Moving from ID to APEX will be difficult for some because certain mindsets need to be broken before you'll be comfortable with APEX. APEX is not ID on steroids, APEX is a different mindset.

I was using an approach in ID that was very popular with clients, but it was nasty to setup and maintain. In ID I would need to visit each screen to update something as simple as a room name or channel icons. In multi-room setups this was very time consuming. This is easy in APEX -- after you give up your ID work habits.
Post 21 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 21:20
IRkiller
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2012
920
RTI users:

Would you now say that APEX is far enough long through evolution and revisions that it would be a good time to move from ID to APEX? I ask because APEX seemed to be released bare bones but seems to have positive progression enough to make the move. 12yo ID user here (no Ernie, I'm not 12 years old).
how in the hell does ernie make money?
Post 22 made on Tuesday April 7, 2020 at 21:34
RTI Vincent
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2017
40
On April 7, 2020 at 21:20, IRkiller said...
RTI users:

Would you now say that APEX is far enough long through evolution and revisions that it would be a good time to move from ID to APEX? I ask because APEX seemed to be released bare bones but seems to have positive progression enough to make the move. 12yo ID user here (no Ernie, I'm not 12 years old).

I think a lot has changed since APEX was first released back in July of 2017. By the time version 10.4 came out, it was much superior to ID9 in many ways. I wish I had this software when I was an RTI dealer. Between the auto-programming, scalable graphics, layers, bundles, room proxy (a fancy word for room tracker) and the ability to make changes to commands, macros, and feedback in a single place, its heads and tails better than ID9, and extremely powerful. I think the time to learn window opened a long time ago, and we keep adding feature after feature, because we can, not because its 'not ready.' It has a more structured approach, but that invites so many great features and organization, which is a welcome change from ID9 where you are just programming graphics.
Vincent Bova
RTI Dealer Experience Manager
Remote Technologies Inc.
Post 23 made on Wednesday April 8, 2020 at 00:36
buzz
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
4,382
On April 7, 2020 at 21:20, IRkiller said...
RTI users:

Would you now say that APEX is far enough long through evolution and revisions that it would be a good time to move from ID to APEX? I ask because APEX seemed to be released bare bones but seems to have positive progression enough to make the move.

After you are comfortable with APEX the dilemma will become how to handle updating an ID configuration. You’ll be debating if you would save time by trashing the ID version and moving to APEX.
Post 24 made on Wednesday April 8, 2020 at 16:53
mrtristan
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
1,634
Are the RTI video courses new and easy to understand? When are they available?
Post 25 made on Thursday April 9, 2020 at 12:16
GotGame
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
4,022
On April 7, 2020 at 06:59, mrtristan said...
I'm an ace programming with ID10 but Apex programming is complex and hard to grasp in my opinion. It's supposed to make it easier to program larger projects but it seems like people still have problems with it. I've tried a few times to program systems and went to the one day training they offered in my city. It wasn't enough and you have to spend some money for training in their facility. Maybe this is the time to spend more time on it. I would love to hear about others' experiences with going to Apex. What percentage of programmers are on it and is it worth the investment in time and money to switch?

I think they are doing online training for free. I need to find the link . I recall seeing that in my email.
I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other.
Post 26 made on Thursday April 9, 2020 at 13:45
drewski300
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2007
3,849
You know the pros and cons of RTI. They are a much better single room solution than an automation/control system. Can they do automation? 100% For us we moved to ProControl instead of RTI for homes without automation. I think we love and push automation but most homeowners don't care nearly as much as we do....

Savant is a very reliable product. The only issues we've had in the past few years were their gray remote and the first gen of their latest remote. I don't know if that has been fixed with their new "Pro" remote. Programming can be done fairly quickly system wide and the UI is great! I really like Savant. However, here are my negatives:
-Entry cost is fairly expensive.
-The software is a beast. A LOT of nooks and crannys to get lost in and forget how to do something. They don't even have a consistent place where macros live. WTF? If you don't program in Savant often, you will forget all of the little things required to create automation. Simple remote control of equipment is however fairly easy.
-Very little customization. For most this isn't a negative including myself.
-Licensing for number of rooms, devices, loads are stupid. I know a lot of companies implement this but it blows when you price out a job for 12 rooms and then you need to add one more room. Oh, that requires a different license which is stupid expensive. I have no idea where they are at with numbers but it was that way 2 years ago (when I was specing it).
-Compatibility between software, firmware, etc is a nightmare. Evening trying to find a document to know what is compatible with what version of MacOS isn't easy. It SUCKS. I literally have a MacMini sitting in our showroom rack. I went to upgrade it a year ago and we were told that the latest software won't work with the MacMini. So you will need to buy a new one at thousands of dollars. Doah-k. Also good luck with MacOS. You will likely need a MacBook that has 3 or 4 versions of MacOS to program different systems.
-Their profiles frankly suck. There are thousands of devices but most profiles are incomplete.
-They seemed to be focused on adding BS product lines more than fixing their cluggy programming environment.
-Do not update software unless it is critical or you need to add a feature that wasn't there before. You will get out to the site, have to update profiles, update MacOS, update firmware on the host, generate services, OMG I'm getting anxiety just typing this.

I will repeat Savant products are great for the customer because they are fairly bulletproof and it give the customer a sexy UI! But damn it's a challenge being on the dealer side.
"Just when I thought you couldn't possibly be any dumber, you go and do something like this... and totally redeem yourself!"
Post 27 made on Thursday April 9, 2020 at 14:43
Audiophiliac
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2006
3,312
On April 9, 2020 at 13:45, drewski300 said...
You know the pros and cons of RTI. They are a much better single room solution than an automation/control system. Can they do automation? 100% For us we moved to ProControl instead of RTI for homes without automation. I think we love and push automation but most homeowners don't care nearly as much as we do....

Savant is a very reliable product. The only issues we've had in the past few years were their gray remote and the first gen of their latest remote. I don't know if that has been fixed with their new "Pro" remote. Programming can be done fairly quickly system wide and the UI is great! I really like Savant. However, here are my negatives:
-Entry cost is fairly expensive.
-The software is a beast. A LOT of nooks and crannys to get lost in and forget how to do something. They don't even have a consistent place where macros live. WTF? If you don't program in Savant often, you will forget all of the little things required to create automation. Simple remote control of equipment is however fairly easy.
-Very little customization. For most this isn't a negative including myself.
-Licensing for number of rooms, devices, loads are stupid. I know a lot of companies implement this but it blows when you price out a job for 12 rooms and then you need to add one more room. Oh, that requires a different license which is stupid expensive. I have no idea where they are at with numbers but it was that way 2 years ago (when I was specing it).
-Compatibility between software, firmware, etc is a nightmare. Evening trying to find a document to know what is compatible with what version of MacOS isn't easy. It SUCKS. I literally have a MacMini sitting in our showroom rack. I went to upgrade it a year ago and we were told that the latest software won't work with the MacMini. So you will need to buy a new one at thousands of dollars. Doah-k. Also good luck with MacOS. You will likely need a MacBook that has 3 or 4 versions of MacOS to program different systems.
-Their profiles frankly suck. There are thousands of devices but most profiles are incomplete.
-They seemed to be focused on adding BS product lines more than fixing their cluggy programming environment.
-Do not update software unless it is critical or you need to add a feature that wasn't there before. You will get out to the site, have to update profiles, update MacOS, update firmware on the host, generate services, OMG I'm getting anxiety just typing this.

I will repeat Savant products are great for the customer because they are fairly bulletproof and it give the customer a sexy UI! But damn it's a challenge being on the dealer side.

So basically, you are not recommending it to your peers, except maybe your direct competitors? :P
"When I eat, it is the food that is scared." - Ron Swanson
Post 28 made on Thursday April 9, 2020 at 15:45
SWFLMike
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2007
356
On April 9, 2020 at 13:45, drewski300 said...
You know the pros and cons of RTI. They are a much better single room solution than an automation/control system. Can they do automation? 100% For us we moved to ProControl instead of RTI for homes without automation. I think we love and push automation but most homeowners don't care nearly as much as we do....

Savant is a very reliable product. The only issues we've had in the past few years were their gray remote and the first gen of their latest remote. I don't know if that has been fixed with their new "Pro" remote. Programming can be done fairly quickly system wide and the UI is great! I really like Savant. However, here are my negatives:
-Entry cost is fairly expensive.
-The software is a beast. A LOT of nooks and crannys to get lost in and forget how to do something. They don't even have a consistent place where macros live. WTF? If you don't program in Savant often, you will forget all of the little things required to create automation. Simple remote control of equipment is however fairly easy.
-Very little customization. For most this isn't a negative including myself.
-Licensing for number of rooms, devices, loads are stupid. I know a lot of companies implement this but it blows when you price out a job for 12 rooms and then you need to add one more room. Oh, that requires a different license which is stupid expensive. I have no idea where they are at with numbers but it was that way 2 years ago (when I was specing it).
-Compatibility between software, firmware, etc is a nightmare. Evening trying to find a document to know what is compatible with what version of MacOS isn't easy. It SUCKS. I literally have a MacMini sitting in our showroom rack. I went to upgrade it a year ago and we were told that the latest software won't work with the MacMini. So you will need to buy a new one at thousands of dollars. Doah-k. Also good luck with MacOS. You will likely need a MacBook that has 3 or 4 versions of MacOS to program different systems.
-Their profiles frankly suck. There are thousands of devices but most profiles are incomplete.
-They seemed to be focused on adding BS product lines more than fixing their cluggy programming environment.
-Do not update software unless it is critical or you need to add a feature that wasn't there before. You will get out to the site, have to update profiles, update MacOS, update firmware on the host, generate services, OMG I'm getting anxiety just typing this.

I will repeat Savant products are great for the customer because they are fairly bulletproof and it give the customer a sexy UI! But damn it's a challenge being on the dealer side.

Great post! My experience with them is very similar. Happy to not be working with that stuff anymore.
Post 29 made on Thursday April 9, 2020 at 18:08
Cams
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2006
485
On April 7, 2020 at 21:20, IRkiller said...
RTI users:

Would you now say that APEX is far enough long through evolution and revisions that it would be a good time to move from ID to APEX? I ask because APEX seemed to be released bare-bones but seems to have positive progression enough to make the move. 12yo ID user here (no Ernie, I'm not 12 years old).

1000% it is. Its been ready for prime time for almost 2 years now. I hated APEX when it first came out, gave up on it a handful of times. But you need to adapt and learn it. It takes a bit, but you will have that ahh moment and get it. Its light years ahead of ID. Its seconds to do things.

Also, I speak from real work experience with 100 of installs out in the real world, from sports bars with 80+ TVs, to single room systems. Vincent can vouch for this !!

Look at their free classes they are offering next week. Then start progrmaming your home system and you will see the light !
Post 30 made on Thursday April 9, 2020 at 22:15
internetraver
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
798
What’s the status on reliability of RTI products?  All of us who tried to hang on to them will never forget the amount of remote control failures or underpowered control processors. Not to mention the fact that it was always the “first time they heard of that issue”

I tried like hell to hang on to my love of RTI because way back in the day they were fantastically reliable. about 2 years ago I decided I would no longer attempt to support or service anything RTI. If I come to a project with RTI, It goes or I go.  Not worth the headache.

and yes, plenty of experience with RTI.....almost as long as they’ve been around!
Page 2 of 3


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse