Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 5 of 8
Topic:
What REALLY makes a difference in a surge supressor system?
This thread has 105 replies. Displaying posts 61 through 75.
Post 61 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 12:41
BigPapa
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
3,139
surge protection = snake oil + you guys dumb

I think that's the gist of it.
Post 62 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 14:21
amirm
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2008
780
On July 13, 2012 at 10:01, westom said...
The NIST defines what a protector must do:

Protection means you know where hundreds of thousands of joules dissipate. The NIST then separates the superior solutions from ineffective protectors:

Where in those recommendations did they discuss energy?

In the FAQ of the same document:

Q – When looking at the devices offered in the store, the packages show specifications and claims that puzzle me.  Can you explain?

A’s = Here are some typical specifications and corresponding comments:
Joules – A (simplified) measure of the surge energy that the protector can dissipate without damage to itself.  The higher the value, the more energy the protector can handle.  Typical values range from about 100 joules, up to 1000 joules or more.  Because this joule number is often based on the three combinations of the wiring, many specifications show the total joules rather than a breakdown among each of the three combinations.  Maximum surge current (below) may give better information.


Where does that energy get connected? How does 47 joules in a protector eliminate destructive surges that are hundreds of thousands of joules? Where is the always required low impedance (ie 'less than 10 feet', wire not in metaliic conduit, etc) connection to earth? Why do they only discuss protectors that the NIST calls "useless"?

This is what NIST says about those "useless" devices in the FAQ:

To be more relaxed bout protection in other rooms, it would be a good idea to install a surge protector for each of the sensitive appliances because of the problem explained on page 12 (see the next Q&A on the whole-house protection and Figure 3 on page 19.)

Q – Will a surge protector installed at the service entrance be sufficient for the whole house?
A – There are two answers to that question: yes for one-line appliances, NO for two-link appliances.  Since most homes today have some ind of two-link appliances, the prudent answer to the question would be NO – but that does not mean that a surge protector installed at the service entrance is useless.  [ Goes on to explain the benefits of whole house protection for large incoming surges]


By two-link they mean any device that has other connections such as phone, cable, sattelite, etc. 

There is more in there related to the post I initially made to you regarding other types of internally generated surges which I will come back to later.

For now, do you have an explaination of why your NIST reference contradicts what you said regarding phone/cable connections being already protected and hence no reason to worry?  Have you read why NIST does worry?

Two completely different types of devices; both are called protectors. Your recommmendations only discuss the type described by the NIST as "useless". The other and superior 'whole house' protector always has that low impedance (ie 'less than 10 foot') connection to what does protection. Does exactly what the NIST says a protector must do: "neither suppress nor arrest a surge, but simply divert it to ground,"

Except that unlike you, they don't ignore internally generated surges and voltage differential due to different connections to the same device.

Single point earth ground. Not just any earth ground. Single point. A 'whole house' protector is the only solution always found in every facility that cannot have damage. Because a protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Why did those recommendations never discuss ground AND never say where hundreds of thousands of joules are absorbed?

And that same principal means that an internally generate surge will not benefit from that grounding and hence, will create surges.  You must put similar devices at every point where such inductive loads exist.
Amir
Founder, Madrona Digital, http://madronadigital.com
Founder, Audio Science Review, http://audiosciencereview.com
Post 63 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 15:43
GotGame
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
4,022
The best surge protector is a human. One that unplugs all the gear prior to a storm. Hey if we are going to talk hypothetical here, I might as well throw mine in.
I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other.
Post 64 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 16:35
iform
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2010
760
On July 13, 2012 at 10:01, westom said...
Your recommendations did not even mention two completely different devices that share a common name. They recommended protectors that the NIST called "useless".

My recommendations? I am not entirely sure you have read anything I wrote. These were not my recommendations, I was simply... forget it, you won't care.

Please tell us how to properly protect my, clients home. Or are you saying that we don't have to do anything at all since it is designed that way from the get go?
Post 65 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 19:09
westom
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2010
116
On July 13, 2012 at 11:43, bcf1963 said...
The only thing I've gleaned from your rather obtuse postings, is that you believe in a whole home surge unit, at the service entrance, with a short low impedance ground lead, to a properly installed ground.

Yes - by far, best protection if properly installed. See numbers below. Questions about magic boxes should be shelved. Critically important points were posted repeatedly. For example, "A protector is only as effective as its earth ground." Therefore most every post should have asked for details. How it is accomplished. Why it does not exist in that house. What must be done?

Instead most replies keep discussing what does not do protection - the protector.

Your telco's $multi-million computer is connected to overhead wires all over town. You may suffer a surge every seven years. They suffer about 100 surges with each storm. What do they use? 'Whole house' solutions connected as short as possible to, well, what does protection? They don't waste money on Belkin, Monster, etc. Instead, money goes into actual protection.

At this point, I no longer remember how many times I might have mentioned this. Watched it completely ignored. How does the telco make all 100 surges irrelevant? Protector is connected 'low impedance' to what does protection. Nobody even asked what low impedance means. Telcos also demand protectors located up to 50 meters distant from electronics. That separation is also important for protection.

Where are questions about protection? Where are questions about earthing? Where are the questions about where energy dissipates? Where are questions about grossly undersized and obscenely overpriced protectors (ie Monster) that have even created house fires. Previously quoted was the IEEE that says that properly earthed protector does: "99.5% to 99.9% protection". Even those numbers were ignored.

iform did post numbers. For example, a 140 joule protector will somehow make hundreds of thousands of joules just disappear? A 3000 or 6000 Belkin or Monster - also near zero. Both only claim to protect from a surge that typically does no damage. Best is to not even mention the many types of surges. Or to discuss earth ground. They have larger profit margins to protect.

Meanwhile earthing is critically important. A surge that typically does damage is hunting for earth destructively via appliances (as noted so many times previously). Or remains harmlessly outside. Is that 100% protection? Of course not; only "99.5% to 99.9% protection".

Facilities that cannot have damage - especially munitions dumps - earth "a whole home surge unit, at the service entrance, with a short low impedance ground lead, to a properly installed ground." An employee could find himself unemployed if installing the Monster protector. Concept is that simple. Implementing it is the art. That art is found in every facility that cannot have damage - including homes.

Posted was :
Companies with better integrity sell the superior solution including Square D, Leviton, General Electric, ABB, Siemens, Ditek, Polyphaser, and Intermatic. A Cutler-Hammer solution sells in Lowes and Home Depot for less than $50. Money does not define quality. Science does. Worry little about the protector. Worry most about what defines protection - single point earth ground.

That paragraph was an excellent place to start asking. Instead it was completely ignored.

Yes, the solution that cost tens or 100 times less money is "a whole home surge unit, at the service entrance, with a short low impedance ground lead, to a properly installed ground". As stated so many times previously.

Where to start asking? Maybe start by defining what you already have. Answer questions recently posted to Fins. But you have to ask what confuses you. And define what currently exists in your home. I cannot read your mind.

Last edited by westom on July 13, 2012 19:21.
Post 66 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 19:12
Tom Ciaramitaro
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2002
7,969
Wow
There is no truth anymore. Only assertions. The internet world has no interest in truth, only vindication for preconceived assumptions.
Post 67 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 19:24
iform
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2010
760
On July 13, 2012 at 19:12, Tom Ciaramitaro said...
Wow

+1.
You still haven't told us how to protect our homes.
Post 68 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 19:37
westom
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2010
116
On July 13, 2012 at 19:24, iform said...
You still haven't told us how to protect our homes.

My god. Even bcf1963 told you how. Did you read anything?
a whole home surge unit, at the service entrance, with a short low impedance ground lead, to a properly installed ground.

Why is 100 years of well proven science so hard? Why do you again post an empty accusation? I cannot help with your confusion if you do not ask.
Post 69 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 20:05
iform
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2010
760
On July 13, 2012 at 19:37, westom said...
My god. Even bcf1963 told you how. Did you read anything?

Why is 100 years of well proven science so hard? Why do you again post an empty accusation? I cannot help with your confusion if you do not ask.

I did fuc*ing ask you conceited ass. And you then jump on me for asking.

Speak to me like I am a potential customer.

What would you do to protect my home?
What products do I need?
Do you supply them or where do I buy them?
What would you charge me for it?
Do you guarantee that my TV and surround system won't be damaged?
Who do I call if my street loses power and when the power comes back on, my surround system doesn't work?

Respond to these questions with simple to the point answers please.
Post 70 made on Friday July 13, 2012 at 23:55
internetraver
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
798
On July 11, 2012 at 22:46, 39 Cent Stamp said...
Blah blah movs joules... Im with Matt... I want a big red ON-OFF switch on the front, lots of outlets and IP control when possible.

Like this??  Under $300.




[Link: digital-loggers.com]
Post 71 made on Saturday July 14, 2012 at 00:02
39 Cent Stamp
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2007
17,519
On July 13, 2012 at 23:55, internetraver said...
Like this??  Under $300.




[Link: digital-loggers.com]

I know this piece very well and i Love it.
Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps
Post 72 made on Saturday July 14, 2012 at 00:15
bcf1963
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
2,767
I had decided to ask a simple question, in an attempt to get a simple reply...

On July 13, 2012 at 11:43, bcf1963 said...
The only thing I've gleaned from your rather obtuse postings, is that you believe in a whole home surge unit, at the service entrance, with a short low impedance ground lead, to a properly installed ground.

Is that all that is needed to protect against lightning for a home? Is this adequate in all cases? Give us your list of what needs to be done... you say it's been understood for many years, so go ahead and let us know that you understand what it is.

On July 13, 2012 at 19:09, westom said...
Yes - by far, best protection if properly installed. See numbers below. Questions about magic boxes should be shelved. Critically important points were posted repeatedly. For example, "A protector is only as effective as its earth ground." Therefore most every post should have asked for details. How it is accomplished. Why it does not exist in that house. What must be done?

So, yes you believe in whole home surge protectors. Great. The rest of this just strikes me as someone on their soapbox, trying to make themselves sound superior.

Instead most replies keep discussing what does not do protection - the protector.

So, more soapbox. How about answering the rest of the question...


On July 13, 2012 at 11:43, bcf1963 said...
Is that all that is needed to protect against lightning for a home? Is this adequate in all cases? Give us your list of what needs to be done... you say it's been understood for many years, so go ahead and let us know that you understand what it is.

So, you get back on your soapbox, without answering the rest of the question.

Your telco's $multi-million computer is connected to overhead wires all over town. You may suffer a surge every seven years. They suffer about 100 surges with each storm. What do they use? 'Whole house' solutions connected as short as possible to, well, what does protection? They don't waste money on Belkin, Monster, etc. Instead, money goes into actual protection.

At this point, I no longer remember how many times I might have mentioned this. Watched it completely ignored. How does the telco make all 100 surges irrelevant? Protector is connected 'low impedance' to what does protection. Nobody even asked what low impedance means. Telcos also demand protectors located up to 50 meters distant from electronics. That separation is also important for protection.

Blah, Blah, Blah... nobody is asking, because we all know what it means. It is just that the rest of us believe that putting a whole home surge unit in place is only part of the solution. You have yet to tell us if you do or don't think anything else is necessary. Ever think that nobody questions a whole home surge unit, because we all believe in them? DUH!

Where are questions about protection? Where are questions about earthing? Where are the questions about where energy dissipates? Where are questions about grossly undersized and obscenely overpriced protectors (ie Monster) that have even created house fires. Previously quoted was the IEEE that says that properly earthed protector does: "99.5% to 99.9% protection". Even those numbers were ignored.

You are really fixated that we have to ask the questions you want asked. Have you noticed you have not answered the one question everyone here keeps asking you... WHAT DO YOU NEED IF ANYTHING IN ADDITION TO A WHOLE HOME SURGE UNIT. Is that clear enough for you yet, or perhaps you wish to go on another meaningless tirade about munitions dumps.

I have no more time to waste on such folly. If you wish to post such meaningless drivel as 100 times less expensive solutions, which you continue to use despite the english lesson on how idiotic such a statement it, then I and the others will happily wash my hands of this thread.

If you post what are ALL the elements to consider and include in a surge solution, we'll discuss those, otherwise I suspect that everyone here will have made up their mind about your true knowledge of the subject.
Post 73 made on Saturday July 14, 2012 at 01:44
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
Let me just pick some random place to comment, because pretty much anywhere I get the same thing:

On July 13, 2012 at 19:09, westom said...
That paragraph was an excellent place to start asking. Instead it was completely ignored.

Okay, but your job as a smartass know-it-all is not to mention facts that should inspire people to ask questions. It's to make what you write THE ANSWER to the questions. If you're so smart, why are you waiting for people to ask more questions? Don't you know we're stupid and it won't occur to us to ask?

We, on the other hand, think that if you mention one more thing in the thousand things you've repeated and repeated, and don't elaborate, it must not be worth you spending time on it. So nobody asks questions.

Please answer or go away.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 74 made on Saturday July 14, 2012 at 11:03
westom
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2010
116
On July 14, 2012 at 01:44, Ernie Gilman said...
We, on the other hand, think that if you mention one more thing in the thousand things you've repeated and repeated, and don't elaborate, it must not be worth you spending time on it. So nobody asks questions.

First you accuse of not elaborating. Then you accuse of posting those facts too many times. It’s just not that hard. What don’t you understand? Did you grasp anything posted? Apparently not. So you are attacking the messenger.

iform finally asked some questions only in his last post. All his questions will be answered. Those answers are found and quoted from previous posts.

Rather than attack the messenger, instead, post what you just cannot comprehend. I cannot read your mind. I have no idea what this simple stuff is so hard for you.. What exactly has you so confused?

Hopefully iform will follow with relevant questions so that I can clarify what he still does not grasp. And no more accusations or quotes from ’extreme profit’ protector manufacturers.

In your case, ask about what you cannot grasp rather than post so emotionally. What you called 'smartass' were the necessary details; provided only for you to learn what was known even 100 years ago. Apparently you don't grasp it. So ask rather than be nasty.
Post 75 made on Saturday July 14, 2012 at 11:09
westom
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2010
116
On July 13, 2012 at 20:05, iform said...
Let's be quite clear about your postings. You never asked any of these questions previously. If you did, I would not be complaining about so many recommending scam protectors (as you did in your earliest post). And never asking about what is relevant or important. You did a google search. Found plenty of myths and lies. Then posted them. Then complain because their useless information was exposed with numbers. At no time did you ask these (your latest) questions. Those questions were already answered. Those answers are quoted below.

> What would you do to protect my home?

Previously posted multiple times and summarized by bcf1963:
a whole home surge unit, at the service entrance, with a short low impedance ground lead, to a properly installed ground.

> What products do I need?
> Do you supply them or where do I buy them?

Posted previously:
Facilities that cannot have damage do not waste money on protectors inside the building. The superior solution, that also costs tens or 100 times less money, is a 'whole house' protector properly earthed. Low impedance connection which means a wire length from protector to earth 'less than 10 feet'. ...
Companies with better integrity sell the superior solution including Square D, Leviton, General Electric, ABB, Siemens, Ditek, Polyphaser, and Intermatic. A Cutler-Hammer solution sells in Lowes and Home Depot for less than $50. Money does not define quality. Science does. Worry little about the protector. Worry most about what defines protection - single point earth ground.

Everything is easily performed by any guy who can replace a wall receptacle. If not capable, then one simply hires an electrician. Of course, that is obvious. Apparently the obvious must be stated.

> What would you charge me for it?

Repeatedly defined previously:
A Cutler-Hammer solution sells in Lowes and Home Depot for less than $50.
Because he installed protection to make direct lightning strikes irrelevant - for about $1 per protected appliance.

Still missing are most important questions about earthing. Where did you even ask about 'low impedance'? You still do not ask even though its importance was bluntly repeated often. :
A protector is only as effective as its earth ground.

> Do you guarantee that my TV and surround system won't be damaged?

Of course not. 100% protection does not exist. Lightning damage means you made the mistake. Only you are responsible for what makes that damage virtually impossible. Your question was answered repeatedly:
The IEEE even defines properly earthed 'whole house' protection with numbers. It is not 100%. The IEEE Standard says "99.5% to 99.9% protection".

Only the homeowner is responsible for what averts that damage. If you do not learn what you are responsible for, then damage is due to this your mistake:
Where did you mention earthing even once? Not once implies no grasp how a lightning rod or 'whole house' protector works.

> Who do I call if my street loses power and when the power comes back
> on, my surround system doesn't work?

Why ask a question about the moon and green cheese? That question and surge protection are obviously completely different anomalies. Power loss is zero volts. AC power is 120 volts. Surges are thousands of volts. The discussion is about thousands of volts and 120 volts. Why discuss zero volts - a completely different anomaly? Those other anomalies were previously discussed:
That anomaly is completely different and irrelevant to this discussion. And completely irrelevant to the OP's question. Numerous anomalies exist including harmonics, frequency variation, phase inversions, EMI/EMC, voltage variation, power factor, etc. Nothing addresses all anomalies. Surge protection is irrelevant to and ignores those anomalies. Most anomalies are typically eliminated by internal appliance design.

Of course, you could call Panamax, Belkin, Monster, or other such manufacturers who claim big buck warranties. Good luck. And already answered:
Did you read their warranty? Many fine print exemptions to it need not be honored. Why would they honor a claim? Read Panamax's spec numbers. They do not even claim to protect from typically destructive surges.

Please read what was posted. All of your questions were already answered. You are still ignoring (not asking about) what is relevant and important.

And that was only about the 'secondary' protection system. Due to so many myths, denials, and accusation, we have let to discuss your 'primary' protection system.
Find in this thread:
Page 5 of 8


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse