Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Harmony Remote Controls Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 3 of 6
Topic:
the upcoming 688
This thread has 83 replies. Displaying posts 31 through 45.
Post 31 made on Friday January 9, 2004 at 12:17
blee
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
14
I was told by the rep that the version on display is definitely a prototype and that they will make some modifications prior to shipping the product in the March timeframe. One of those modifications will be to "raise the buttons" a bit - I didn't really press him for much more detail.

Again, during the ~10 mins. I played around with it I really liked it. For me, if somehow it doesn't work I'll just go back to the 659, which I really don't have any major issues with. I would suspect that Harmony will let me return the 688 if for some reason I don't like it, and if not, the price I paid was so low that I can sell it and probably make a profit.
Post 32 made on Friday January 9, 2004 at 12:48
MP3 Mike
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2004
19
blee: Does the web site already support the 688, or do you just use the 659?
Post 33 made on Friday January 9, 2004 at 13:08
Arjen
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
274
I was looking forward to this remote as a possible challenger to the MX-700. Well...not quite...they'd have to support macros on the LCD buttons first, and make the Smart-State-Technology optional.

Anyway, this remote would look great as part of a designer decor, but it does not seem very practical. I also think they should move the Volume buttons to the more standard position, and swap them with the Page buttons.

I'm out. I'll stick with the MX-700 and the SST-659.
Post 34 made on Friday January 9, 2004 at 16:18
Stephen Tu
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
56
Ugh, this looks like a disaster.

Really the 659 was quite close; they went for too radical change here. All the 659 really had to do to make a near ideal PVR remote is swap the placement of transport/number pad, and add chapter skip buttons (which work great for DVD/CD, and jump back/forward on a PVR). That & maybe go slightly bigger so they could use larger buttons, & maybe make the LCD a tad bigger for an extra line of commands.

Guess I'll stick with my venerable MX-500 for now.
Post 35 made on Friday January 9, 2004 at 16:51
MP3 Mike
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2004
19
One more question for you blee: How well does the 5-way direction pad thingy work? I have seen too many remotes where it didn't work very well, and that is my biggest concern with the 688.

I was turned off at first, but after printing the pictures out and looking at it some more, I think the layout will work fairly well.

And of course you can make the page buttons control the volume if you want, as I assume they haven't taken all the control away from you.
Post 36 made on Friday January 9, 2004 at 18:21
blee
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
14
MP3 Mike - The transition from a 659 to a 688 should be fairly straightforward. When you install the software off the CD for the 688 you would logon to the Harmony website and do a "connectivity test", and once your new remote is detected it will internally modify your configuration for the 688, or any other remote for that matter.

I agree that they should swap the volume and page buttons, although as you mentioned these can easily be remapped if necessary. I honestly can't remember how well the directional buttons worked, but I tell you, when I picked the 688 up and started pressing buttons I really loved the tactile feel. The only buttons I know for sure that I didn't like were the LCD selection buttons, as they are so close to the edge to begin with and the new button style (vs. the 659's) made this worse. Perhaps their raising of the buttons will help in this regard, but I also think my need to use them will be lessened with the 688's button layout.
Post 37 made on Saturday January 10, 2004 at 11:53
Arjen
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
274
That's interesting, because the LCD buttons on the 659 are really pretty crappy. They wobble in their oversized sockets, and have terrible feedback. I often push them thinking it was fine, but actually not pushing them hard enough. The LCD buttons on the 688 actually look much better to me...
Post 38 made on Saturday January 10, 2004 at 12:13
Daniel Tonks
Wrangler of Remotes
Joined:
Posts:
October 1998
28,781
I found the current 688's LCD buttons low and stiff - but since things *are* being worked on, they may improve.
Post 39 made on Saturday January 10, 2004 at 19:38
Bierboy
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2003
380
On 01/10/04 12:13, Stephen Tu said...
....and add chapter skip buttons (which work great for DVD/CD,
and jump back/forward on a PVR)



My channel up and down buttons work as chapter forward and back on my 659. I love the setup.
Harmony One - Hitachi 51UWX20B - TiVo Series 3 - CM 4221 - CM 9521A - Onkyo TX-SR601S - Denon DVM-1815 - Panamax Max 4300
Post 40 made on Sunday January 11, 2004 at 12:22
Stephen Tu
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
56
On 01/10/04 19:38, Bierboy said...
| ....and add chapter skip buttons (which work
great for DVD/CD,
My channel up and down buttons work as chapter
forward and back on my 659. I love the setup.

This doesn't work great for devices that still need channel up/down for channel changing. PVR needs both. DVD-R needs both. On a CD or DVD jukebox or changer it's also nice to be able to use channel up/down to change discs, yet still retain quick access to the chapter skip.
OP | Post 41 made on Sunday January 11, 2004 at 13:29
eddieras
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2002
312
On 01/11/04 12:22, Stephen Tu said...
On a CD or DVD jukebox or changer it's also nice to be able to use channel up/down to change discs, yet still retain quick access to the chapter skip.

i guess it's all a matter of preference- i use the channel up/down for chapter skip and have the disc change (DISC 1, thru 5) as selections in my LCD
Post 42 made on Sunday January 11, 2004 at 19:58
brianlees
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2003
7
I think the remote is a mess. Volume controls in a horrible location, already mentioned here. Did you see the controls at the bottom of the "circle"? The menu, exut, guide, and info buttons just blend all together. I have a 659. We use those buttons all the time with the onscreen tv guides.

And, don't get me started on the mute button. How many times have you had to quickly mute the tv or music (loud commercials, phone rings)? The mute button is in a good location on the 659. In fact, I can use any button on the 659 without looking. Although I did not see the 688 in person to know how the remotes feel (I am stuck in cold NJ), but it does not appear that I could do the same with this remote.

If they had fixed the problem with not being able to use the top two menu buttons and it still looked similar to the 659 (within reason), I would really consider upgrading. I love Harmony and I think they are doing a good job...but they need to take this one back to the drawing board.

Brian
Post 43 made on Sunday January 11, 2004 at 21:15
Anthony
Ultimate Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
28,876
Brian, are you at CES? if you look at the pics carefully you will notice the buttons have grooves between them. Also from what blee said the feel is not as bad as it looks on the pics and the production model will be even better (from what he was told).
...
Post 44 made on Monday January 12, 2004 at 10:41
MikeSRC
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2001
5,958
The buttons will be changed on the final version to give more of a tactile separation. Daniel and I both spoke to them about swapping the location of the "Page" and "Volume" buttons. If that change happened, the "Mute" button would presumably be moved as well.

The thumbpad feel was very good, although I personally would prefer a larger one (fat thumbs ;-) ).

Mike
www.SurfRemote.com
www.SurfRemoteControl.com

THX-certified video calibrator and contributing writer, ProjectorReviews.com
Post 45 made on Monday January 12, 2004 at 11:11
tsaylor
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2003
90
I understand your comments about the volume buttons, but swapping it with the page up/down buttons seems like a bad idea. My reason is that page up/down typically controls "pages" of visual information on the screen, and pressing horizontally mounted buttons to scroll vertical information would not be intuitive at all.

At least the horizontal arrangement of the volume buttons matches well with the horizontal volume bar that is displayed on most televisions. I've used horizontal volume buttons and vertical volume buttons, and I have a slight preference for vertical but both orientations seemed to work well for me.
Find in this thread:
Page 3 of 6


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse