 |
 |
|
|
One For All & Radio Shack Forum - View Post
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | Moving advanced coded buttons? This thread has 19 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 20. |
|
| OP | Post 16 made on Sunday February 13, 2000 at 15:51 |
Gerard J. Pinzone Historic Forum Post |
|
|
"I followed the instructions you described to test it out (after making sure I could no longer program a code into my C7), and had no problem
assigning an advanced code to a non-shifted button, after clearing out the key with the shifted EFC."
Cool! Well that settles that issue...
I've got to try that "advanced code" of one device to another sequence again. Yes, I actually did try that one :) I'll update the FAQ if I can't do it.
|
|
| OP | Post 17 made on Sunday February 13, 2000 at 23:09 |
Gerard J. Pinzone Historic Forum Post |
|
|
David B.:
"Back in the old days, "boiling down" meant reduce or condense."
Ever hear of that other expression about openning a can of worms?
;-0
|
|
| OP | Post 18 made on Sunday February 13, 2000 at 23:15 |
Gerard J. Pinzone Historic Forum Post |
|
|
Cico: "Ok, that makes less sense. I don't mind if you prefer a different notation to the one I described, but I feel I should point out that your version won't work." I just tried it again and it DOES work. [device2] [SETUP**] 994 [device1] [SETUP] ### [key1] Either way... [Link: ampersand.hypermart.net]
|
|
| OP | Post 19 made on Monday February 14, 2000 at 00:12 |
David B. Historic Forum Post |
|
|
The worms escaped.
Dave ;-)
|
|
| OP | Post 20 made on Thursday February 17, 2000 at 02:02 |
Ger
Gerard,
>"Ok, that makes less sense. I don't mind if you prefer >a different
>notation to the one I described, but I feel I should >point out that your
>version won't work."
>I just tried it again and it DOES work.
>[device2] [SETUP**] 994 [device1] [SETUP] ### [key1]
Yeah, you're right. Your notation does work, and I think the reason it
didn't work for me when I tried it the last time, was because I was
starting off with the first device listed, as my source device, the
second as my target. I must have immediately thought to do that
because that's intuitive to me, and the way the notation is described
is counter-intuitive to me. But as you say, either way will work.
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
