Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 2 of 2
Topic:
power filtering/surge protection?
This thread has 23 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 24.
Post 16 made on Wednesday February 22, 2006 at 18:16
djnorm
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
1,693
Did anyone see the surge protector the AV guys used on the This Old House "Cambridge modern" that just ended? It was a HUGE copper transformer of some sort wall mounted in the basement. Must have weighed 80-100 pounds (just guessing from looking at it). Just wondering...
Post 17 made on Thursday February 23, 2006 at 23:01
AnthonyZ
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2005
1,987
I'll take a different track here as I do believe in the filtering side. We spec in Panamax primarily due to brownouts. When the juice kicks back on you get a surge that can (and has) kill gear. Expensive gear. We upped to filtering after I decided to play with it in my own theater. I absolutely experienced an improvement in picture quality (fewer mosquitos) and it also opened up the depth of my soundstage. While difficult to quantify, I recommend it.
"Just when I thought that I was out they pull me back in"
Post 18 made on Friday February 24, 2006 at 08:58
dualtriamp
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
96
On February 22, 2006 at 18:16, djnorm said...
Did anyone see the surge protector the AV guys
used on the This Old House "Cambridge modern"
that just ended? It was a HUGE copper transformer
of some sort wall mounted in the basement. Must
have weighed 80-100 pounds (just guessing from
looking at it). Just wondering...

I use a Liebert Powermate 5kva unit I found at a pawn shop.
Better is the nemesis of good.
Post 19 made on Friday February 24, 2006 at 09:04
mnmcomm
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2004
71
Did anyone see this yesterday? It came in on our PanaMax dealer e-list.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

For Immediate Release February 23, 2006 Petaluma, CA

-----------------------------------------------------

Panamax Acquires Furman Sound, Inc.

-----------------------------------------------------

An engineering leader in power for music/recording industry, Furman

will complement Panamax within growing Home Technology Group.

Over 60 years of power engineering are about to come together in Petaluma, CA. Panamax (founded 1975) has acquired Furman Sound, Inc. (founded 1974), in a move that will complement each other’s offerings and expand the growing family of companies in the Home Technology Group of Linear LLC (Carlsbad, CA). No terms of the purchase were disclosed. Widely known for its innovative AC power conditioning and distribution products, Furman also makes audio and video signal processors, a line the company was founded upon in 1974.

Bill Pollock, President of Panamax, states “My team and I are excited about the growth potential for both companies that this engineering partnership will allow. We believe that the advantages of a strong group, especially one with world-class engineering and electronics manufacturing operations, will increase our ability to bring new and innovative products to our global customer base. As a privately held, 30 year old company Panamax has always been responsive to changes in our economy, customers and product environment. Bringing these two leaders together under one roof, will allow us numerous opportunities to help our customers grow profitable businesses.”

According to Grant D. Rummell, Chairman of Linear, “Furman is a great fit within our Home Technology Group. Its offerings neatly dovetail with those of Panamax and expand our reach beyond the residential market and into the music industry.”

“Our technologies and products are very complementary, and that means we will be in a position to give our customers exactly the right solutions for their particular needs, said Dave Keller, Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Furman. “The bringing together of Furman and Panamax is a perfect marriage.”

Furman Sound was founded on sales of high-quality audio and video signal processors for professional audio/video products including sound reinforcement, home and professional recording, post production, broadcast systems, telecommunications, and data processing. They expanded their product line and market segment in 2001 to include what has become a highly acclaimed CE line which incorporates a complete line of AC power management products specifically engineered for today's home theater systems.

Panamax makes a wide range of innovative and award winning power conditioning products for home theater electronics, high definition cable and satellite TV systems, household appliances, office equipment, and related electrical systems. The Max home theater component family of products is its flagship line that provides clean power and improves picture quality. The patented Max In-Wall brand is its line of superior design, easy plug-in panels for code-compliant installation of plasma screen TVs.

If you have any questions, please contact your Panamax Account Manager.
mnmcomm
The best price is not always the best value.
Post 20 made on Friday February 24, 2006 at 22:13
arielav
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2005
14
Go with the Panamax. Fruman was just bought out by them. Furman is also a lot more expensive. At the CES show in las Vegas (Jan 2005)Panamax ran some very high current spikes into the Panamax, Fruman and Monster products. Monster caught on fire, sprinkers went off and law suits started. Furman perfromed much better but did not acknolwedge the spike caused damadge. Panamax had no problem.

Models depend on what you need to filter. For audio niose start with the 4300ex and below should be helpful. If you need video filtering you need to start with the 5100ex and go up depending on what type of problem you have.
Post 21 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 17:09
ELA
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2005
238
Interesting thread,
I have been trying to decide which type of protection is better after reading about series mode recently.
Is series mode intended to protect against surges only or RF interference as well?

I am very interested in learning more. I am familiar with industrial type EMI filters as well as MOVs. I had always thought that the "better" protective devices would incorporate both MOVs and EMI filters.

What is confusing me now is the fact that series mode protection devices do not reference ground at all (from my limited reading on them). I can see where this is good from the standpoint of preventing ground contamination. How do these types of devices protect again common mode noise or transients? I was taught that capacitors from each line to ground were required for this yet the series mode have none? Most industrial EMI filters I have been exposed to do have caps from each line to ground.

Do the manufacturers of the series mode devices state test results in terms of both differential and common mode noise attenutation?
I am no expert. I thought I knew a few things and now I am a bit confused and I am always wanting to learn more.


Regards,
Ela
Ela
Post 22 made on Friday April 14, 2006 at 14:13
Ted Wetzel
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
879
I purposely let this go but as it has come up again I think it's time to add some more of my thoughts on the subject

On February 22, 2006 at 08:52, bcf1963 said...
The semiconductors in the Surgex will have taken
wear after severals hits, and there's no gas gauge
on that unit either.

Yes and no. Series mode uses electronics to track the voltage but the module that is actually absorbing the hit has a MUCH higher lifespan than any $0.25 MOV. Estimated lifespan in Florida is a minimum of ten years and for the majority of the country it is limitless. Please keep in mind that the last time I asked about it New Frontiers had yet to have a single documented failure of their device. If I search these pages I can find dozens of recorded failures of MOV devices. I do realize that in many cases the device did protect the equipment but the unit itself still failed.

As far as the MOV turning into a bomb... For the
MOV to provide any explosive force, you would
need containment and a buildup of pressure. Bomb
is a dramatic word... but a real poor example
of what will happen in this situation. The MOV
when it fails will barely give off a puff of smoke
large enough to be noticed.

I can't completely agree with this. I have customers who have had the MOV protectors put on the meter or the main panel absolutely blast off like a rocket from a major hit. The pulse that's used for the A-1-1 rating also can turn a mov into an explosive device. I've seen a Pan***ax or two cracked, blackened and burnt from lightning and we have ALL seen the cheaper veriety with the burn marks on the cheap plastic surge strips just from daily pulses from within the house, not storm damage. That's why we went to 1449-2, because MOVs get hot just from normal daily surges.

The voltage and amperage used for the A-1-1 testing is used in part due to the fact that it also happens to be the rating for NM-B sheathed cable. Again I would suggest that you look at 1449 adjunct testing, not listing. There is a reason most of these companies don't present the product for testing. It simply can't compete.

Either I or you misunderstand something here.
The surgex can break the path, but it can't do
so before the voltage is already rising. One
hit good enough to do some good damage will jump
right over the spacing of the kind of series element
semiconductors they use. If the lightning strike
is enough energy to blow the MOV, I propose that
it will ionize the air, and jump the gap of the
series protection elements in the surgex. That's
part of the reason I believe the surgex is overkill.

I don't have the engineering backround that I believe you do, but this leads me to believe that you misunderstand series mode technology. A product from New Frontiers will never break the path at all. It simply absorbs the hit.
"SurgeX is tested to Grade A, Class 1 Mode 1 of UL 1449-2 Adjunct Endurance Testing: 1000 surges of 6000 Volts and 3000 Amps."

think about that number. And that's not disconnecting or shutting of your gear. That's saying it will continue to operate normaly to the point that your romex catches on fire.

Some commercial issues are a totally different
issue. The most likely place for lightning to
hit a residence is the electrical service entrance,
or the entrance from a dish or antenna. The surgex
will do a nice job on the power, and leave the
other unprotected. You'll end up using MOV's
on the other likely entry points, as surgex doesn't
have a solution for these. Then you have two
different surge protection manufacturers each
pointing their finger at each other, and nothing
gets paid out. I'd rather put MOV's from a single
manufacturer in all locations, and let them pick
up the bill if/when something is damaged.

It's true that New Frontiers does not offer a solution for low voltage situations. You are left with using an MOV device or gas tubes for the low voltage. However, as you point out, the primary point of concern for low voltage is the point of entrance. That's not always the case for high voltage. I often use an MOV device at the service point and make sure that everything is very well grounded. New Frontiers will sometimes even admit that if you are going to use an MOV device, this is the place for it. Any ground contamination will be short lived before it hits the servcie ground. From a marketing stand point they are left with a dilemma. How do you say that MOVs aren't so bad at the service point for low voltage but nowhere else? The official company line is that if the incoming cable and phone line are properly grounded then you shouldn't have a problem and if you do it's the utility that's responsible for damage, which is true. But for us it's a hard sell. so I use a combination that I belive best serves my clients.

I still contend that when you look at the supperior voltage tracking, supperior noise filtering and vastly supperior surge protection that you get out of a $330 box from New Frontier that it becomes a no brainer on just about any of the systems we do, except for simple bedroom TV. And in that case I usually use a 20amp NERT and just have the electician wire all of the small system locations back to it. Now I've protected several small systems for $400.

There will always be room for the more popular MOV devices. I found this product because I wasn't entirely happy with MOV boxes and I wanted a better mouse trap. Series mode does have it's limitations but for what it does do, it does it better than the rest.

I've made this disclaimer before and I'll make it again. These guys are local so I've had the oportunity to get much deeper into the technology than you would on a typical internet search. I don't work for them but they do believe in the product and have backed up every answer with data.

Last edited by Ted Wetzel on April 14, 2006 20:10.
Post 23 made on Friday April 14, 2006 at 15:15
ELA
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2005
238
Sorry to stir things up again.

I was hoping to learn something new. Since I started reading about series mode protection I have became very interested. For the most part I like what I read. For me it comes down to whether or not you believe common mode surges are a real threat. The series mode folks seem to dismiss common mode as a threat and they do not appear to protect against it.

All these companies are biased towards their design.
I liked this from PowerVar:

[Link: powervar.com]

It appears that the UL1449 standard does not talk much about common mode either.
I can tell you that Industrial Surge testing has a very specific requirement to test both normal and common mode. For sure an industrial environment is more severe than the home but I do believe that common mode can still be an issue there.

I do not know which manufacturer has claims to protect against both but that is where I would put my money.

Regards,
Ela
Ela
Post 24 made on Friday April 14, 2006 at 16:28
Ted Wetzel
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
879
ELA,

It does not look to me like powervar is the series mode that I know of. the patent for series mode is pretty closely held. In the audio arena It is primarily available for New Frontiers. I know Adcom had the licensing for awhile but I don't know if they are doing anything with it. Brick wall is the only other comany I know of using the patent in the audio world. I know it is availbe in industrial arenas but I don't know from who.

Just to reiterate. UL1449 is more the safety rating than a performance rating. Incidently several pieces that get touted as power conditioners aren't even UL1449 rated. They are listed as audio devices. It is the UL1449-2 adjunct testing that is the performance rating for actual surge test conditions.

If you have an issue with the technology I would suggest you call New Frontiers and see if you can get the engineer on the phone. That used to be pretty easy to do but I don't know if it as easy as it used to be.

As a side note I was at an A**D training last year were Pan**x was one of the trainings. As luck would have it I was called on to help with the demo in front of the group. Not to be racially insensitive but this is sort of like asking Mr. King to give a talk on the benefits of the KKK. For the few in the know it was quite comical.
Page 2 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse