Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 2 of 2
Topic:
Telephone Head End
This thread has 24 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 25.
Post 16 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 11:57
ceied
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
5,753
did not realise they still made 66 blocks..... doesnt everyone use some kind of structured wiring system? for our really big houses we will do it with leviton like our commercial jobs nice racks et al......

maybe i'm to extreme and need to learn to do stuff bullshitty cuz it looks like people will pay for bullshit work.

my 2 cents

ed
Ed will be known as the Tiger Woods of the integration business, followed closely with the renaming of his company to "Hotties A/V". The tag line will be "We like big racks and tight holes"...
Post 17 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 14:11
tschulte
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2005
808
We now do strictly structrued wiring enclosures (OnQ/Legrand or Leviton). Used to have too many issues with homeowners (or worse the telephone guys) messing with our wires and losing jacks.

I really like the OnQ/Legrand (Greyfox) stuff because it can be used for so many things. Phone today, network tomorrow, camera Tuesday, intercom Friday ... That really impresses the H/O. I have found that the builders could care less as long as they don't get call backs.

P.S. Larry, I didn't mean ALL electricians are bad. We get some of our biggest jobs from electricians that don't know the difference between Cat3 2 pair and Cat5 4 pair.
Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
Post 18 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 16:02
cma
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
3,044
I use 66 blocks, it is the only way to go in large jobs and give me the flexibility to do anything I want with the cat5. I can wire any jack in the house anyway I want for what ever I need it to do, I can tap off a pair on any cat5 for IR, phone, network, contact closure or whatever else I may need to do, I'm not stuck with Blue=line1 Orange=Line2 and so on.. Yes the panel systems can be prettier but for full flexibility the old standard 66 blocks are the way to go.
Post 19 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 16:35
QQQ
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
4,806
What 66 blocks do you use that meet Cat 5 spec?
Post 20 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 16:37
QQQ
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
4,806
You guys that have used OnQ AND USTec, do you have a preference, and why?
Post 21 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 16:42
cma
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
3,044
On February 18, 2006 at 16:35, QQQ said...
Why even use Cat 5 if you are going to use 66
blocks? They don't in any way meet the Cat 5
spec.

Since when does cat5 spec have anything to do with telephone? We run 2 cat5's to each jack, one network specific goes to a 568a or b block, and the other goes to a 66 block. When you have a cat5 running to an office with jacks set up where one jack may be on a panasonic phone system which requires the Blue and Orange pairs and then you have a jack connected to the Green pair but that green pair needs to go to the output of a fax modem switch because the fax line is being used as a voice line is alot easier to set up with a basic 66 block than when you typically punch down every pair of a cat5 to a distributed phone module on one of the Leviton or whatever headend system which then bridges every jack in the home together.
Post 22 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 17:26
djnorm
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
1,693
I think the point was - Why use 66 blocks instead of 110 blocks? At least if you punch down to the 110 block, and then decide one needs to be a LAN jack, you can just punch to the 110 and extend to a LAN panel. With a 66 block you would have to rip it out and move it.
Post 23 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 17:45
QQQ
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
4,806
On February 18, 2006 at 17:26, djnorm said...
I think the point was - Why use 66 blocks instead
of 110 blocks?

Ya, that was exactly the point. But I actually edited my question but CMA got to it before that. The statement he quoted from me is incorrect (on my part). A little Googling showed that there apparently are 66 blocks that now support Cat 5. That did not used to be the case. It's been years since we've used a 66 blocks and when we did none were Cat 5 rated.
Post 24 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 17:50
cma
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
3,044
On February 18, 2006 at 17:26, djnorm said...
I think the point was - Why use 66 blocks instead
of 110 blocks? At least if you punch down to the
110 block, and then decide one needs to be a LAN
jack, you can just punch to the 110 and extend
to a LAN panel. With a 66 block you would have
to rip it out and move it.

My bad, I actually meant 110 as well instead of 66, I think I'm still a little hazy from the Reverend Horton Heat last night, I need to step back from the computer and get outside. I know 66 or 110 isn't ideal and doesn't fall under spec for networking but in a pinch it does work.

Last edited by cma on February 18, 2006 17:58.
Post 25 made on Saturday February 18, 2006 at 21:07
QQQ
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
4,806
On February 18, 2006 at 17:50, cma said...

I know 66 or 110
isn't ideal and doesn't fall under spec for networking
but in a pinch it does work.

110 is fine for networking.
Page 2 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse