Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 3 of 8
Topic:
Sonos finally Crestron Controlled!
This thread has 110 replies. Displaying posts 31 through 45.
Post 31 made on Wednesday August 31, 2016 at 19:03
Dean Roddey
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
1,009
On August 31, 2016 at 18:14, Sean@iTank said...
Control over their user experience--that's the whole point.

But that's a non-argument. It presupposes that only those companies are competent to interface to a Sonos box. This is clearly incorrect as proven by other products in the field that have long supported them. And, it's also irrelevant because it's just a protocol, and the person who creates the user interface and the automation logic for a given installation is who is really creating the user experience. All the automation system vendor really has to provide is the interface/driver. So is the argument that only installers who use those products can create a good user experience, and that all of the installers who use those products will create a good user experience?
Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
Post 32 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 06:53
FP Crazy
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2003
2,940
On August 31, 2016 at 16:34, 3PedalMINI said...
Again, they used and chose companies that have a large HA presence and not wannabe companies or companies that have one foot in the grave and the other on a very wet and slippery banana (ala RTI)

URC didnt even get picked, and even that being said URC im sure will come (if it is even coming) before RTI

I for one, am so thankful you post on this forum and share your many, many years and vast experience with all of us newbie wannabes.

I guess that I have been a HomeLogic/ElanG integrator for 13 years (since 2003) means that I have been wasting my time installing a "wannabe" automation platform all this time.

Who Knew?

But I'm sure at least the Crestron integrators are relieved that you have validated their choice of automation platforms

What were you doing in 2003?
Chasing Ernie's post count, one useless post at a time.
Post 33 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 08:05
BigPapa
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
3,139
On September 1, 2016 at 06:53, FP Crazy said...
What were you doing in 2003?

Who, me? I was still wondering WTF that PHAST/Panja thing was and trying to get heavy clunky super expensive touchscreens to stay connected to WiFi.

The thing about Sonos is that it was great but everybody else caught up. I have a C4 touchscreen in my office with an iPad and I've been using C4 and Sonos together and separately. C4's UI for music is equivalent.

Control4 needs to make a Playbar killer. After the UI Sonos' other big hit was the Playbar/Sub combo. That Playbar hits the spot in the mid markets.
Post 34 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 08:13
Rob Grabon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
1,392
The bigger picture....

1. Sonos can focus more on hardware and Crestron, Control4, Savant on software.
2. The broad customer base will use Sonos as a qualifier, doesn't work with, then it's junk. I'm not saying they're right, but it's what they will do.
3. This isn't what Sonos has been working on all year.....
4. Provides a large hurdle to other companies getting into the distributed music market... Like Amazon.
5. Want a remote ala Bose, buy a pico, I'm sure lutron will make them a special labeled one. (ohh, just read the article, they do $49, hmm no mention of needing to buy the smart bridge to use it though....)
6. Cross selling, will Sonos sell casetta, will lutron promote Sonos, etc?

There will be a lot of ramifications of this.

Last edited by Rob Grabon on September 1, 2016 09:03.
Technology is cheap, Time is expensive.
Post 35 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 08:38
Rob Grabon
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
1,392
Here's the stuff of nightmares for you....

What if all the revamped Sonos products, including the Boost, have already built-in the Casetta smart bridge hardware. New app update and they have Lighting, Music and HVAC (Nest). Lutron and Nest get huge market boosts, direct marketing.

Sonos overtakes the IOT with the flip of a switch.
Technology is cheap, Time is expensive.
Post 36 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 09:05
BigPapa
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
3,139
Post 37 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 10:04
Sean@iTank
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2011
193
On August 31, 2016 at 19:03, Dean Roddey said...
But that's a non-argument. It presupposes that only those companies are competent to interface to a Sonos box. This is clearly incorrect as proven by other products in the field that have long supported them. And, it's also irrelevant because it's just a protocol, and the person who creates the user interface and the automation logic for a given installation is who is really creating the user experience. All the automation system vendor really has to provide is the interface/driver. So is the argument that only installers who use those products can create a good user experience, and that all of the installers who use those products will create a good user experience?

Hardly, but if Sonos wants to maintain control of their user experience--with an officially supported API--then they're going to start with partners that have the most market penetration and the most internal resources. After the success of that deployment can be evaluated in the market (months, years, whatever) then they can look to expand those partnerships to other players. It seems a pretty straightforward move, although I understand that smaller market players (like yourself) would feel frustration at being left out.
Post 38 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 13:51
Dean Roddey
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
1,009
Years, or even a year, is as synonym for never basically in this game. If it were that long, I imagine we'd end up just making them irrelevant to our customers by implementing more direct support for streaming services. We already have integrated media management and can support lots of different media servers and players (including our own) for streaming local file based media. We would likely move to supporting more streaming services directly and just save our customers the bucks. We'd prefer to do other things with that time; but. if that's what it came down to, that would be the way it would likely go.

I imagine many other companies in the same boat might be thinking the same thing. Why not just skip the middle-man if he doesn't want to do business with you? I imagine other companies not in the same boat (aka C4, Crestron, Savant, etc...) would be thinking similar thoughts as well. Why let the middle man get between you and your customers and therefore have control over you?
Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
Post 39 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 14:24
oprahthehutt.
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2011
625
On August 31, 2016 at 16:34, 3PedalMINI said...
Again, they used and chose companies that have a large HA presence and not wannabe companies or companies that have one foot in the grave and the other on a very wet and slippery banana (ala RTI)

URC didnt even get picked, and even that being said URC im sure will come (if it is even coming) before RTI

Any other inside info that you have from sitting in on Sonos meetings? Did you not have to sign an NDA? Can you go ahead and tell everyone what the Sonos roadmap looks like 5 years out?

While we are at it you seem to have a very good grasp on RTI financials. We still do some RTI, I would like to know with your vast knowledge of RTI finance if this is still a viable option. Please post the P&L for the last 6 quarters that you must have in a binder somewhere.
Post 40 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 14:35
oprahthehutt.
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2011
625
I don't understand why everything Sonos puts everyone in a tizzy.

Basically it sounds like whatever driver your chosen platform has or had for Sonos is going from a "hacked" solution to a "supported" one. Functionality appears to be the same.

I would guess going forward RTI, Elan, CQC etc will get their Sonos gold star. Oh thank you so much Sonos for acknowledging (enter chosen platform here).

My guess is that Sonos doesnt want to open the flood gates and get hammered all at once by every company in the worlds software engineering team. They will probably work with this select group of companies, and develop the API to include more and more features that all platforms will then be able to utilize.

And yes a wall mounted Pico that can play a favorite and control volume for auxiliary rooms or rooms where the prewire crew didnt drop a Cat5e is going to be very nice.
Post 41 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 15:20
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
On September 1, 2016 at 14:24, oprahthehutt. said...
Any other inside info that you have from sitting in on Sonos meetings? Did you not have to sign an NDA? Can you go ahead and tell everyone what the Sonos roadmap looks like 5 years out?

While we are at it you seem to have a very good grasp on RTI financials. We still do some RTI, I would like to know with your vast knowledge of RTI finance if this is still a viable option. Please post the P&L for the last 6 quarters that you must have in a binder somewhere.

Based on C4's disclosed financial history, and the plummet of their stock price from their IPO until recently, I suspect they are probably the least solid of the major players in the industry. Crestron and RTI have solid histories, URC produces almost every OEM remote made, and Elan has a new parent company with extremely deep pockets.

As a kid I got tired of only drinking red Kool aid
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 42 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 15:56
Seth_j
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2006
15
On September 1, 2016 at 15:20, Fins said...
Based on C4's disclosed financial history, and the plummet of their stock price from their IPO until recently, I suspect they are probably the least solid of the major players in the industry. Crestron and RTI have solid histories, URC produces almost every OEM remote made, and Elan has a new parent company with extremely deep pockets.

As a kid I got tired of only drinking red Kool aid

This a joke right?
💼 BlackWire | ☕️ Two Hour Lunch | 🎙HomeTech.fm
Post 43 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 16:00
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
On September 1, 2016 at 15:56, Seth_j said...
This a joke right?

Have you fallen for the C4 propaganda that they are making money?
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Post 44 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 16:17
Seth_j
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2006
15
On September 1, 2016 at 16:00, Fins said...
Have you fallen for the C4 propaganda that they are making money?

Well their numbers are all on the table and they still manage to afford a booth at CEDIA.


Oh and it think its absolutely great Crestron can finally control Sonos... Its like 2010 for you guys! I wonder what Control4 will announce at CEDIA that the leaders in home automation will be able to show at CEDIA 2022! :D
💼 BlackWire | ☕️ Two Hour Lunch | 🎙HomeTech.fm
Post 45 made on Thursday September 1, 2016 at 17:25
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
On September 1, 2016 at 16:17, Seth_j said...
Well their numbers are all on the table and they still manage to afford a booth at CEDIA.

Oh and it think its absolutely great Crestron can finally control Sonos... Its like 2010 for you guys! I wonder what Control4 will announce at CEDIA that the leaders in home automation will be able to show at CEDIA 2022! :D

Your right, there numbers are all out in the open. And except for the last two or three quarters, they have all been in the red too. So what if they can afford a booth at Cedia? They've had no problem spending into debt since they were founded. And those founders cut and ran just as most people predicted as soon as they got enough cash in the bank.
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

Find in this thread:
Page 3 of 8


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse