| Post 16 made on Wednesday February 22, 2012 at 21:20 |
drewski300 Super Member |
Joined:
Posts: | January 2007
3,849 |
|
|
I understand they both are software based numbers. I just think they are gimicky. Truthfully, I almost always shut off the clearmotion/motionflow because I can't stand them. I personally think the video processing in the Sony's are nicer than Samsungs and the Gorilla Glass is really cool. I do however like the ultra thin bezel of Samsungs. I prefer Sony's overall.
|
"Just when I thought you couldn't possibly be any dumber, you go and do something like this... and totally redeem yourself!" |
|
| Post 17 made on Wednesday February 22, 2012 at 21:35 |
theKevin Senior Member |
Joined:
Posts: | April 2008
1,475 |
|
|
the number isn't based on software, but rather magicware. the panel refreshes at 240Hz, and doesn't generate any more frames. next, the marketing team pretends that the backlight and the coating on the glass somehow combine their wonder twin powers to boost the motion 'flow' to 960 'somethings'.
meanwhile, plasma displays all refresh at 600Hz.
ultimately i agree with you (and probably the vast majority of nerds):
the best refresh rates are 24, 60, or 72Hz.
|
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. |
|
| Post 18 made on Wednesday February 22, 2012 at 23:10 |
The worst part about Sony is the only true 240 panels they offer are the HX and XBR line. Why put the Gorilla glass on the NX series and not make it 240 is beyond belief. And the HX series does not have the Gorilla glass, go figure.
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
