Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 2 of 2
Topic:
RCA DLP tvs ????
This thread has 28 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 29.
Post 16 made on Thursday February 19, 2004 at 19:29
JBJ SYSTEMS
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2004
859
I think that the RCA Scenium RPCRT's look great...I would put it right there with the Toshibas.

DLP...unless they start making 3 chip RPTV's is just not that impressive for the rear projection application.
Tact is for people who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic!
Post 17 made on Thursday February 19, 2004 at 23:14
avdude
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
814
On 02/19/04 07:14, Springs said...
Infocus had nothing to do with the RCA piece huh.
Surprising, I swear I read it on multiple forums
and thought that it was real info. That is why
I was so shocked at the lousy picture.

Then again... it did say RCA... why was I surprised?

Springs...

state your sources/forums please, with links. This would be news to me, and would shock the hell outta me, as I've been told MANY times that the ONLY products that share ANY technology from InFocus/Proxima are Toshiba, and Dreamvision...

Since I sell alot of em...my InFocus rep tells me these things...

If InFocus IS has involved itself at that level, I would seriously consider removing them from my line card.

avdude
AVDUDE
"It might work better if it were plugged in and programmed first...just a thought!"
Post 18 made on Friday February 20, 2004 at 08:56
Springs
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2002
3,238
[Link: avsforum.com]
[Link: avsforum.com]
[Link: audiorevolution.com]
[Link: search.netscape.com]
[Link: thomsonscenium.com]
[Link: thomsonscenium.com]

From RCAs website.
The RCA Scenium HDLP50W151 promises to set new standards for HDTV video performance, incorporating state-of-the-art microdisplay light engine design from InFocus® Corporation, a worldwide leader in digital projection technology. The InFocus microdisplay engine is designed to Thomson specifications and incorporates Texas Instruments' second-generation Mustang/HD 2 chip for improved brightness and contrast.

Those links should work.. I hope.
Post 19 made on Tuesday February 24, 2004 at 13:06
Springs
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2002
3,238
So did you dup the line!

Just kidding.
Post 20 made on Tuesday February 24, 2004 at 14:47
Mikeyb
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
230
I believe the newer - not yet released - RCA DLP's will use an InFocus light engine. The newer DLP's being the very thin (like 7" or less) models. The first RCA DLP's used who-knows-what light engine.
Post 21 made on Tuesday February 24, 2004 at 20:12
avdude
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
814
On 02/24/04 13:06, Springs said...
So did you dup the line!

Just kidding.

Springs,

Haven't yet, but WILL if they are associated with a picture quality like the currntly available RCA DLP's...they are HORRID, and incredibly hard to work on.

Never the less, based on the links you have provided, I would like to thank you...

My humble pie is delicious, and is going quite well with my crow quiche!

avdude
site admin
www.integrationpros.com
AVDUDE
"It might work better if it were plugged in and programmed first...just a thought!"
Post 22 made on Tuesday February 24, 2004 at 23:24
AVXpressions
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
1,163
Not to rob this tread but have any of you used the OPTOMA RPDLP's or the SIM2 RPDLP's ????

Robbie S
Post 23 made on Monday April 26, 2004 at 20:09
michaelferrigno
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
40
I have the optoma dlp, rca dlp and samsung's dlp. Optoma is hands down the best but also by far the most expensive. email if you have any more questions
Post 24 made on Tuesday April 27, 2004 at 01:17
JWhitby
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
205
I have had the pleasure of installing 6 samsung DLP and 3 RCA DLP rear projection tv's. Out of them 4 of the samsung bulbs and or boards went bad. and I have only just heard one of the RCA's is now taking upwards of 5 -10 minutes to turn on. I am overall not too impressed by their success but they look incredible on HD...and I will concede that they SUCK on SD and do a terrible job of stretching the picture.
"I was merely pondering the words of Socrates when he said " I drank what?""
Post 25 made on Tuesday April 27, 2004 at 05:00
HDTVJunkie
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
467
Bottom feeding always results in unpredictable results.
Post 26 made on Tuesday April 27, 2004 at 15:28
Swish
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
8
Check out your first response from "JBJ SYSTEMS"
He knows what he is talking about.
If you are trying to hit a budget, then see if you can prep your room for a CRT. You will be much happier with the black levels and detail.
Make sure you don't buy a cheap plasma. I recommend a Fujitsu or a Pioneer Elite if you go that route. They have comparable lifespans to those of conventional tube TV's as well as depth that their competitors are continously striving to match. I sound like I work for them. LOL! I don't!!
As far as LCD's are concerned, go for the flat panel. Sharp's flat panel LCD's are the best looking when it comes to 32" on up. Be aware that LCD's seem to have a little trouble with edges on standard TV. They look spectacular on HDTV though.

Good Luck!
Swish
Post 27 made on Wednesday April 28, 2004 at 00:08
JWhitby
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
205
I have not been pleased with the LCD tv's at all. They look great until motion is introduced. We watched a football game in HD and the legs of the players were blurred beyond recognition. Next we tried a hockey game in HD... Couldn't find the puck for 3/4 of the game because the tv couldn't keep up. Anything larger than 20" in my humble opinion looks like crap.
"I was merely pondering the words of Socrates when he said " I drank what?""
Post 28 made on Sunday October 3, 2004 at 18:59
appletj
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2004
1
I looked at the RCA DLPs because they include a full ATSC tuner. I was disappointed by the amount of noise compared to Samsung. I eventually purchased an Optoma based on price compared to Samsung.
Post 29 made on Monday October 4, 2004 at 00:41
flcusat
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2003
1,326
Thats the problem with LCD technology. If your primary source of material is sports where you have a fast movement of the picture you don't want to use LCD. One of the criticisms of LCD TVs is that they sometimes can't keep up with motion, and a trail follows the image as it moves across the screen. New LCD displays like the Sharp's LC-45G1U wich has a refresh rate of less than 16 milliseconds is said to improve performance in action sequences.
Also I don't remember the size and model but RCA and Infocus were both displaying a DLP set at CEDIA that were identical and the one from RCA had the Infocus sign on the right front side.
I'm always right. The only time I was wrong was the time that I thought, that I was wrong.
Page 2 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse