Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 3 of 3
Topic:
Discretes - why still an issue? (discussion)
This thread has 38 replies. Displaying posts 31 through 39.
Post 31 made on Thursday October 16, 2003 at 23:33
QQQ
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2002
4,806
Eric:

I do not believe the fact that one flawed concept that there was little demand for failed leads to the conclusion you are drawing. Similarly I could suggest that because standards (TCIP) made the Internet possible that my position is correct - but it would be a flawed argument :-).

I belong to CEDIA and while they have done many good things for the industry, this just seems to me and some others to be an area they have droppped the ball on. One final thing - unlike CEBUS - discrete codes are a relatively painless (no expense) and easy thing to implement and there is almost 100% support in our industry as to their usefullness. So I think the challenge to come up with a recommended minimum standard is minimal in the overall scheme of thngs.

I'll make one other argument. This isn't just a matter of making our lives as installers easier. The more "controllable" and predictable components are and therfore easier to use, the happier end users are and the more our industry grows. One more reason CEDIA should care about this issue.

This message was edited by QQQ on 10/16/03 23:56.
OP | Post 32 made on Friday October 17, 2003 at 07:51
deb1919
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2001
344
Don't buy products you can't automate!

We don't, but figuring out what products those are is a full-time job. Just last week we we're trying to come up with 50" and 42" plasmas that were the color the wife wanted, with HDTV res, with discrete codes, and of the same brand that was available at the time and at a reasonable price point.

Not to mention, products sold by others, as in the case of the Marantz RC5000 that started this thread. The system worked great, except for the Vidikron DLP on the ceiling with no discrete anything.
Post 33 made on Thursday October 23, 2003 at 21:53
AutomationGuy
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
3
I agree completely on having a CEDIA Certified Product line. If all CEDIA Members would back the idea, Manufactures would start to listen. Unfortunitely, the problem is getting worse. How many more new products are going to come out with Proprietary crap that won't play nicely in high end automation systems?!
Post 34 made on Thursday October 23, 2003 at 23:03
avdude
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
814
AutomatioGuy...

you're right and you're wrong....

You're right in that there is stuff coming out faster than we can keep up, and that lots of it is proprietary...and if prontos, mx line stuff and Harmonies are involved (which is definitely the majority in this market right now) then we're screwed!

Your wrong in that it won't play nicely with "high end" automation systems...

most of these products DO play nicely with AMX, Crestron, Elan, Xplore and CorAccess...the problem is that people (sometimes the integrator or customer) have to pay big bucks to get these high end toys to play with the high end automation systems for the first time....then everyone else reaps the benefits...

Most of the big players though (Crestron, Elan, AMX and CorAccess) will write modules as fast as they can, and often on request, to support the latest gear...they are of course depending on some sort of RS-232, ir, or ability to sync, to deal with some of these issues.

Anyone ever automated a Bose RF?

avdude, CCPI I
site admin
www.integrationpros.com
AVDUDE
"It might work better if it were plugged in and programmed first...just a thought!"
Post 35 made on Friday October 24, 2003 at 03:18
Marc Silver
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
64
In a professional situation when dealing with complete "numbnuts" the issue of leaving equipment on all the time is not a solution.
If someone could steer me straight, I was under the impression that with the indepth documentation available on the NET, that it is possible to construct discrete commands from existing IR commands.
If this is not possible I will cease my studies into the particulars of infra-red code structure and go wakeboarding instead.
Post 36 made on Friday October 24, 2003 at 10:01
avdude
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
814
marc,

I agree 100%

Unfortunately, there are some products out there that will NOT respond to discrete versions of their own toggle bit codes...

The numbers are coming down, but there are still some out there.

Most of the lower end TV's for example, still don't have discreet power commands, some will work if you re-work the codes, and some won't.

For as far into this industry as some of us are, you'd think we'd (the manufacturers) would be further along in this quest...oh well.

Have never tried wakeboarding, it sounds fun and rather stress free...

avdude
site admin
www.integrationpros.com
AVDUDE
"It might work better if it were plugged in and programmed first...just a thought!"
Post 37 made on Friday October 24, 2003 at 14:07
Anthony
Ultimate Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2001
28,878
Mark, a response to a discrete code is built into the equipment, so it is either there or it is not and you cannot do anything about it. What happens is that some devices accept discrete codes that are not on the original remote, that is where using one code from the device you can edit it to get the discrete codes that are missing on the original remote.
...
Post 38 made on Monday October 27, 2003 at 14:40
AutomationGuy
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
3
You are correct. If the manufacturer had the forsight to include an RS232 port. Until the day that all equipment has in IR IN 1/8" mini-jack instead of having to add IR emitters, and all discrete commands are available IR, the equipment will only behave in the more expensive automation systems. The problem is that sales can't always sell AMX or Crestron control for smaller systems, yet we are expected to "Make It Work" with the limited control capabilities.

automationguy
CCPI II
Post 39 made on Tuesday October 28, 2003 at 03:16
Marc Silver
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
64
There are ways around having to use AMX and CRESTRON touchscreens and controllers for RS-232 control of equipment from a wireless touchscreen!!!!
But you'll have to work that one out for yourselves if you have not already done so.
Page 3 of 3


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse