Duh! This is the issue when opening products to folks who are not ready for it. Why would it not be Prodigy ready? Prodigy is a processor. If you can write the code and get the code into the processor you can control it.

There is always some overhead but a well written module ought not to take much processor overhead. The current Homeworks module is about as inefficient as might be written and it takes up very little memory.

The trick is not if it can be controlled but where the module is coming from. Crestron and Lutron are not on speaking terms. Crestron's not going to write it. Doesn't mean you could not yourself or pay someone to do it for you.

Personally, I would not use a Prodigy sysetm with more than 18 dimmers. But if you are Prodigy only and have a larger system write the module, or pay someone else to write it just like any other product where there is not module for the device in the Cresdb.

Anything will work with Prodigy, if you can write the code. I wrote a module of Grafik Eye QS. I haven't seen the Radio Ra2 protocol. Everything is controllable. Essentially, button press and led feedback is hardly memory intensive.

Alan