On October 20, 2007 at 12:45, Darnitol said...
| The result was that the manufacturer started looking for
concept cars that received very split ratings: very strong
weighting towards "I love it" and towards
"I hate it!"
ProWizard was designed to reach a particular goal, and
the software helps you get there quickly with minimal
training. If you're okay with that goal, the MX-810 is
an amazing bottleneck reliever that lets you take on more
jobs with your existing staff. We're getting ecstatic
reactions from those dealers.
And yes, that polarity I mentioned above means that some
dealers are naturally going to dislike the alternate choice.
But if reactions at trade shows and in orders taken are
any indication, the MX-810 is going to have quite a following.
It's not "right" or "wrong" to see the MX-810 as a good
solution for your customers: it's just a matter of your
own preferences, experience, and programming style as
dictated by the needs of your clients.
So how does "love the remote" but "hate the software" fit into URC's plan?
So Prowizard was developed for a certain demo in mind. Who was the 810 designed for? Why do they have to be connected at the hip? It seems that URC is limiting the 810 to only those dealers who are willing to learn how to program it. That should go over well with end users.
The 810 probably will have a nice following. It is a very well laid out remote. But why is URC leaving many sales on the table by connecting the 810 to Prowizard?
