Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Philips Pronto NG Family Forum - View Post
Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Original thread:
Post 5 made on Wednesday October 13, 2004 at 17:18
johnsfine
IR Expert
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
5,159
On 10/13/04 20:19 ET, sddroog said...
Actually, I did find your other post already and
tried it using MakeHex. However, I used the device
code 64.191, which didn't work. The IR code you
posted above does work, so I assume just using
device code 64 will work.

Device 64 and device 64.191 are identical. When there is no subdevice, the part of the signal that would hold the subdevice instead holds a check byte equal to 255 minus the main device. Since 255 minus 64 is 191, encoding 64.191 produces the signal for device 64 with no subdevice.

So if your earlier attempt didn't work, there must have been some other difference.

Note that the .irp file posted above differs from the normal nec1.irp in both the frequency and the form. The frequency is different because that's the real difference from nec1. The form is different in order to disguise the result. Undisguised, the signal would be correct but ProntoEditNG would recognise it and then wreck it.


Hosting Services by ipHouse