On December 9, 2006 at 11:46, BigPapa said...
You proved my point. You did type 'it,' which changed
the meaning of the statement entirely, making it confusing.
The way is was typed, 'it' referred to the statment of
the reviewer, not Fujitsu. Do you really want to keep
going around on this?
Sure BP, I will prove you wrong if you insist. You tried to get me on a technicality, I used the word "it" for "Fujitso" this sentence required a little brains to understand that "it" was Fujitsu.
While you wrote:
"The problem is that you're wrong Rich. You should have just typed 'it' instead of 'Fujitsu' so your statement wasn't confusing."
Now who's statement is confusing as that is exactly what I did, I just typed "it" instead of "Fujitsu".
Who is the one confused here? Who made the largest mistake in their sentence? guess what BP it was you...... You just told me I should have done exactly as I did.
Sorry if using "it" for "Fujitsu" was confusing for you, I will try to make it easier for you from now on, I know now how easily you are confused. LOL
BP you have run out of excuses to defend URC so you try to slam me now? You can try and twist my words if you wish. URC still was the one in the wrong to do this to their customers.
