On November 21, 2019 at 00:23, tomciara said...
If you are conducting the hearings, the beautiful part is, you get to draw in all of these people and all the stories that really have no bearing on anything at all, but then you get to indict people that normally would go unnoticed.
"all of these people"? Like the 1/2 dozen or so that are ignoring requests to testify and/or ignoring subpoenas for depositions & documents?
What you are forgetting is that this was supposed to be an impeachment hearing for something, but that something didn’t pan out so then let’s try something else, well that didn’t pan out so well either, well let’s try this… And on and on it goes.
What I'm forgetting? More like what you're making up (or parroting from Sean Hannity). It's an impeachment hearing about the President
abusing his power by asking a foreign government to dig up dirt on his assumed political rival in the 2020 election. They are in the process of gathering evidence (which would be much easier if Trump didn't stop people from showing up - why does an "innocent" person need to hide so much?) and when they have finished they will draw up articles of impeachment. Your "Try this, try something else, rinse/repeat" argument is too lame to be taken seriously. A common theme for most of the dribble that comes out of you mouth.
