On April 17, 2015 at 19:44, Mr. Stanley said...
I was jsut reporting on what my local news commentator said origionally.
In other words:
*someone who is trained to read news without thinking critically about the real world impact of what he's reading
*then formulated an opinion based on what he took away from it
*then you told us about it
*NOT quoting word for word what was said, thus removing the statement one more misquote from the truth.
On April 17, 2015 at 19:47, Mr. Stanley said...
Lets disect his thing to pieces, examine every post and point fingers if something isnt 100% accurate.
Are you now stating that things you say simply do not hold up to scrutiny? Okay, I'll go with that, if that's what this objection means.
F**k, go get laid or something. I just reported it as it was initially reported. What the hell is the big deal MAC?
You did NOT report as it was initiolly reported. You put forth, without quoting (thus injecting any of your lack of understanding of the details), someone's opinion, that someone not being a labor specialist, and the story was about a unique labor and salary issue. Right? That's a lot like the guy I'm now listening to on TV, who's advertising mattresses, commenting on transformer versus resistor type wall-mount speaker level volume controls. Sure, he can do it, but he's an idiot on this particular subject.
