Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Philips Pronto NG Family Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
Problem with RF extender
This thread has 6 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Monday August 29, 2005 at 05:10
RC9500_user
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
6
Hi,
I own an RC9500 with an RF extender RX-77. My RC9500 is working perfectly alone for the devices (BOSE, FORCE, NEC) the discrets codes come from remotecentral.com.

When I am usig the RX-77 rf extentder i have some problemes with the Force 500 series (DVBt) the signal seem to be sent 2 times, for instence if i press button "1" i get "11", chanel up gets 2 chanels up an so on for each button. This problem seem to be specific for the force 500 since all other devices are working nicely.
I use the clean FORCE code from this link:
[Link: remotecentral.com]

Exempel button 1 (Force series 500)
0000 006C 0012 0012 0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20 0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 0041 0008 0047 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20

Any ideas

/Dag
Post 2 made on Monday August 29, 2005 at 21:57
morrieb
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2003
16
have you tried sending the code direct with IR on the remote to see if it is sending double codes?
OP | Post 3 made on Tuesday August 30, 2005 at 04:19
RC9500_user
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
6
Yes, there is no problemes directly from the remote, all codes are doing well. That only when i am using the rf extender. I ve tryed changing the position of the RF and add delay but nothing helps. Note there is only problem with the Force Series 5.
Post 4 made on Tuesday August 30, 2005 at 10:49
Lyndel McGee
RC Moderator
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
12,910
Dag,

Note that you may also have to set the IR Code duration.

Change the first 4 groups of 4 numbers in the code to the following and retest:

Test #1 - Repeating only

0000 006c 0000 0024

Test #2 - Non-repeating only

0000 006c 0024 0000
Lyndel McGee
Philips Pronto Addict/Beta Tester
OP | Post 5 made on Tuesday August 30, 2005 at 15:41
RC9500_user
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
6
thanks for the help!

The test #1 doesnot work att all. Test #2 works but seem to be slow, and some times i have to press the buton several times.
Post 6 made on Thursday September 1, 2005 at 15:15
johnsfine
IR Expert
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
5,159
A perfect version of this signal has three parts: an initial frame to say the button was pressed, a repeating frame to say the button is still held, and a final frame to say the button was released.

A Pronto generally can't learn the final frame, and I haven't heard of any problems being caused by lacking the final frame, so I don't think that is part of the problem here.

I don't know what causes the symptom because I don't know exactly what the RC9500 sends when using IR directly vs. what it sends via the RX-77.

Do I understand correctly that the RX-77 uses RF from the RC9500 itself (not from some intermediate IR to RF conversion)? So the firmware of the RC9500 knows the intended path is via RF? So it could make some change in what it sends that the firmware programmers thought would be benefitial for RF but in this case is harmfull.

I wouldn't be surprised if the choice of RF changes the number of frames of the repeat part that is sent. But I also wouldn't be surprised if it changes some other timing detail. This protocol is rather touchy about timing details.

Test #1 above alternates the press frame with the hold frame. I wouldn't think that would be a good thing, but I also wouldn't try to guess what the IR receiverr in the Force would interpret it as.

Test #2 above sends exactly one press frame followed by exactly one hold frame. That was a good thing to try and I'm a little surprised the results were so disappointing. With that version is there still a significant difference between the way direct IR responds and the way IR via RF responds?

Maybe the device needs more than one hold frame but not so many as the firmware is providing with the original Pronto Hex. You could construct Pronto Hex with a few of the hold frame, such as this one with two hold frames:

0000 006C 0012 0024 0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20 0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 0041 0008 0047 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20 0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 0041 0008 0047 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20
OP | Post 7 made on Thursday September 1, 2005 at 15:39
RC9500_user
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
6
Do I understand correctly that the RX-77 uses
RF from the RC9500 itself (not from some intermediate
IR to RF conversion)? So the firmware of the
RC9500 knows the intended path is via RF? So
it could make some change in what it sends that
the firmware programmers thought would be benefitial
for RF but in this case is harmfull.

yes, the RC9500 sends the RF signal directly to the RX77


Test #2 above sends exactly one press frame followed
by exactly one hold frame. That was a good thing
to try and I'm a little surprised the results
were so disappointing. With that version is there
still a significant difference between the way
direct IR responds and the way IR via RF responds?

with IR direct from the RC9500 the commands are very quick (has quick as the original remote, But trough the RX77 (RFmode) the commande using test#2 are very slow and seems to be miss understand

Maybe the device needs more than one hold frame
but not so many as the firmware is providing with
the original Pronto Hex. You could construct
Pronto Hex with a few of the hold frame, such
as this one with two hold frames:

0000 006C 0012 0024 0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D
0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060
0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 001D 0008 001D
0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20
0008 001D 0008 005B 0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032
0008 0032 0008 001D 0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D
0008 0041 0008 0047 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D
0008 001D 0008 0022 0008 0C20 0008 001D 0008 005B
0008 001D 0008 006B 0008 0032 0008 0032 0008 001D
0008 0060 0008 021B 0008 001D 0008 0041 0008 0047
0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 001D 0008 0022
0008 0C20


Just tried, its get 3 quick "1"

Well Force Ir codes seem to be tricky


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse