|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
|
ANY WAY TO USE THE SuperNudelist PROGRAM...
| |
|
| Topic: | ANY WAY TO USE THE SuperNudelist PROGRAM with the RC5200/9200 REMOTES?? This thread has 12 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
| Post 1 made on Sunday January 6, 2002 at 12:57 |
drhb Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2001 519 |
|
|
The SNL program does NOT work with these new remotes because of the incompatability of both the Compiler/Decompiler program and the SNL program, with the new screen sizes.
In order to use the SNL program, is there a way to MANUALLY edit the cd lists to add more cds, without entering the SNL program itself?? Perhaps there is a way to add cds to the xml lists, or some other list, so that new entries will appear there.
OR, is there some other workaround to use the SNL program with these new remotes??
I would appreciate anyone's help on this!
This message was edited by drhb on 01/06/02 21:20.07.
|
|
| Post 2 made on Monday January 7, 2002 at 09:23 |
Anthony Ultimate Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2001 28,798 |
|
|
The only thing that might work (until the next version of C/D) is to create a simple IR panel (in a different CCF) with only the numbers and anything else needed by SNL. Then save it in a C/D compatible version. Use that CCF to make your CD/DVD list. Then all you need to do is merge your CCF and the CD/DVD CCF.
|
... |
|
| OP | Post 3 made on Monday January 7, 2002 at 09:42 |
drhb Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2001 519 |
|
|
Anthony, thanks for the help. Sounds like a good idea, and I shall try it. BTW, I emailed both Olivier (for an update on the c/d), and Leo, to request an update. Leo is apparantly tied up with work, and the hope for an SNL update is dim at this point.. :-( Best, Harris
|
|
| Post 4 made on Friday January 11, 2002 at 16:28 |
grubin Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2002 38 |
|
|
Harris,
Did you try Anthony's suggestion? Did it work?
Geoff
|
|
| OP | Post 5 made on Friday January 11, 2002 at 16:59 |
drhb Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2001 519 |
|
|
Geoff, sort of... When you reconvert the SNL screens from 5000i ccf format to the 5200 format, you still get a space above and below the screen, on every page. Moreover, all hard buttons are incorrect; the only way to avoid the latter is to delete ANY hard button references in the SNL, and then to manually put them back when the final, 5200 ccf is merged with the pages made with SNL. It is really a hassle, and frankly what I am doing until Leo is able to free up the time (and Olivier, with the required decompiler program, which also needs to be changed to work with the 52/9200), is to manually add new buttons with cd titles and aliases, as if they were put in by the SNL program. Hope an update arrives soon...:-) Best, Harris
|
|
| Post 6 made on Saturday January 12, 2002 at 09:45 |
Leo Davidson Founding Member |
|
|
Making SNL output more buttons per panel is probably not too difficult (I'd have to look at the source) but if the compiler/decompiler doesn't support it (e.g. it checks the coordinates are not outside the old screen area) there's not much I can do.
If someone gives it a try and finds that the c/d will happily generate buttons outside the screen area drop me an email and I'll look at making SNL output more buttons per page.
|
|
|
| Post 7 made on Saturday January 12, 2002 at 10:55 |
Olivier Couvreur Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 5 |
|
|
I've just checked in source code and coordinate values are not tested at all, so putting buttons outside screen area (240 x 219) should not cause any problem.
FYI, I'm starting to add support for RC5200/9200 in Compiler/Decompiler. :-))
Once again a lot of work.. So please be patient.
Olivier Couvreur
|
|
| OP | Post 8 made on Saturday January 12, 2002 at 16:30 |
drhb Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2001 519 |
|
|
Leo and Olivier, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU..  !!!!!! Your efforts and generous time expended, are VERY much appreciated. At least there is light at the end of the tunnel, and there is hope that it is doable!!!! Leo, I tried it with my ccf, and the SNL will not generate anything outside of the screen area; after reconverting back to the 5200 format from the 5000 format, the screen is the standard 5000 size, with the top and bottom of the 5200 left blank. Olivier, unfortunately, as you no doubt have discovered, the c/d will not recognize as valid, a 5200/9200 ccf; and when converted to the 5000 format and after using c/d and then reconverting it, as noted, the top and bottom of the page is cut off. The ccf I sent to both of you is VERY complex, and if either program is made to work with it, it will no doubt work with ANY 5200 or 9200 program. At least there is hope indeed; I feared that it would be too much of a problem to upgrade both of the programs...:  .... Hope to hear from both of you soon. Leo, and Olivier, I wish I could be more of a help, but I am computer challenged. However, if there is ANYTHING I can do via beta testing of either of your programs, please feel free to drop me a line ( [email protected]). Good Luck & Best Regards, Harris This message was edited by drhb on 01/12/02 16:49.25.
|
|
| Post 9 made on Sunday January 13, 2002 at 16:18 |
Leo Davidson Founding Member |
|
|
Thanks for the info Olivier! Harris, could you try this out and let me know how it works for you: [Link: ox.compsoc.net]There isn't quite enough space for two more rows, certainly not without keeping the line at the bottom, but I added two anyway and now you can't see the bottom line (which was really a semi-useful space-filler anyway) and there's a couple of pixels missing off the heading but I figure it's more useful this way. Need to make the heading graphic slightly smaller I guess... Let me know if it works and I'll link it from the webpage. If anyone else with a bigger-screen remote wants to try it feel free. Leo
|
|
|
| OP | Post 10 made on Sunday January 13, 2002 at 17:05 |
drhb Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2001 519 |
|
|
Thanks again Leo, (and Olivier!) for your efforts!!! (Please ignore the post I just placed; the following is now correct...:-): The test SNL program was installed in the wrong directory by me, and thus I got bad info...)
It is a VERY noticable improvement! After putting it in the correct directory, indeed the actual pages are placed flush with the top of the screen after reconversion by TouchscreenEdit back to the 5200 format, rather than being centered with a space at the top and the bottom. Also noted are more entries per page on those pages with more than 9 buttons; ie, now there are indeed up to 14 bars. (Note that only the 5200 conversion to 5000 ccf format works; otherwise, with a 5200 ccf format, one still gets a ccfdll error).
The alphabet page looks the same; ie, it is still centered with a space at the top and the bottom. Perhaps as you noted, other icons (or spacing...) can fill in the larger page format better.
Also, as you noted, Leo, the navigation bar at the bottom of each individual page is now gone. This isn't a problem, as if there are more than one page, one could see the presence of a "down" arrow. I think it is much better to use as much space as possible for additional buttons.
Also, I am not sure if the aliases to the hard buttons would have to be changed; as you know, the order of the side buttons on the 52/9200 is reversed from prior versions of these remotes, and there are the other 5 programmable buttons and the 4 on the touchpad.....
Hope this feedback helps!
Talk with you soon,
Best, Harris
This message was edited by drhb on 01/13/02 19:07.06.
|
|
| Post 11 made on Saturday May 25, 2002 at 13:20 |
Bruce Hartley Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2001 397 |
|
|
I have tried this 5200 version uf supernudelist, it works fine except........
The first header bar is almost pushed off the top of the screen. This makes it almost invisible.
Can't seem to switch on and off the bottom menu bar, not sure if that would make a difference.
Is anybody else using this?
Thanks, Bruce.
|
|
| Post 12 made on Monday May 27, 2002 at 12:53 |
Leo Davidson Founding Member |
|
|
Bruce,
It's not just you; that's just the way it is. This version was more just a test, really. Proper support for the larger screen remotes really needs a new layout to be designed, or at least for the existing button sizes to be tweaked slightly.
|
|
|
| Post 13 made on Monday May 27, 2002 at 16:09 |
Bruce Hartley Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2001 397 |
|
|
No problem Leo,
Just wanted to make sure I wasn't going mad!!
Look forward to the next version.
Thanks, Bruce.
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|