 |
 |
|
|
Philips Pronto Classic Forum - View Post
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
|
Should ProntoPro have a separate FORUM...
| |
|
| Topic: | Should ProntoPro have a separate FORUM here? This thread has 13 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
| Post 1 made on Monday June 25, 2001 at 12:40 |
With the advent of the ProntoPro we are and will be seeing a lot of posts here that will be irrelevant to the majority who are still using the Pronto and its siblings. I would vote for having a separate forum and files section on RemoteCentral for the ProntoPro.
Any "pro" or con opinions on that? (Would that make a con actually a pro "pro"??)
Doug
|
|
| OP | Post 2 made on Monday June 25, 2001 at 12:59 |
After Daniel reviews the unit and they become available, I imagine he will probably dedicate another forum to the PRO (space permitting of course).
We all owe him a debt of gratitude for this site and the forums.
|
|
| OP | Post 3 made on Monday June 25, 2001 at 13:44 |
alpha2data Historic Forum Post |
|
|
Doug and Steve...
I think he would already be in the advance planning stages for that if he was going to implement it since he is in test mode on the new forum already.
I am not sure what is involved, but I would imagine that there would be management considerations for him to separate forums that may not at first be able to be efficiently and/or economically done especially since advertising rates are normally based upon "hits"; although I am still awaiting a call to find out how the hit rate is calculated on this site.
If in the interim those of us posting messages state cleary in some way that it involves the "Pro" or TSU6000 (TSU6k TSU2k) etc., it would help everyone out.
I would think that right now there is universal interest on the part of everyone just from the standpoint of "inquiring minds like to know"!
-Bruce
alpha2data
|
|
| OP | Post 4 made on Monday June 25, 2001 at 18:17 |
Peter Dewildt Historic Forum Post |
|
|
Absolutely NOT. Keep the one forum.
|
|
| OP | Post 5 made on Monday June 25, 2001 at 19:09 |
Barry Shaw / Sound Pro Historic Forum Post |
|
|
We'll be using both the 2K and the Pro depending on the situation, but the various incarnations of Pronto/RC's have so much in common I'd prefer a single forum for all models.
|
|
| OP | Post 6 made on Monday June 25, 2001 at 19:11 |
|
| OP | Post 7 made on Tuesday June 26, 2001 at 14:49 |
Anthony Historic Forum Post |
|
|
I would think one forum is enough.
|
|
| OP | Post 8 made on Tuesday June 26, 2001 at 15:44 |
Beemer Historic Forum Post |
|
|
|
| OP | Post 9 made on Tuesday June 26, 2001 at 21:47 |
GregoriusM Historic Forum Post |
|
|
As Steve said above on 06/25/01 12:59.34:
"We all owe him a debt of gratitude for this site and the forums."
Look at the new BDT Award logo on the left side of this page, under the AVSmarts logo.
That's how you can pay your debt of gratitude!!! Check it out!
|
|
| OP | Post 10 made on Wednesday June 27, 2001 at 09:20 |
One forum OK I suppose, just put "PRO" in the subject line
|
|
| OP | Post 11 made on Wednesday June 27, 2001 at 10:45 |
Alexis Guillen Historic Forum Post |
|
|
It would seem to make little sense in opening another forum for a newer version of the Pronto. Should we then open a new forum for RC5000 users only? I think not.
--Alexis
|
|
| OP | Post 12 made on Wednesday June 27, 2001 at 13:07 |
Pronto and RC5000 are the (almost) same. What you read about one almost always applies to the other. But if you have a Pronto and you are reading threads about the Pro you are usually wasting your time, and may even be mislead!
I hope everyone will clearly indicate PRO in the subject so those of us without a Pro can just skip it.
And at this point, there would be no way to assure that Pro users only post in a Pro forum. I think we are doomed to one forum, so I am sorry I brought it up.
But we ALL agree that Daniel desrves a round of applause, 1 forum or not.
|
|
| OP | Post 13 made on Wednesday June 27, 2001 at 18:24 |
lunchmin Historic Forum Post |
|
|
|
| OP | Post 14 made on Wednesday June 27, 2001 at 20:42 |
Peter Dewildt Historic Forum Post |
|
|
From a programming point of view there are almost no differences between the color and monochrome versions.
There are actually more differences between ProntoEdit V2 and V1.05 then there are between V3 and V2.
Sure there will be different hardware issues, but programming is virtually the same.
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
