On December 31, 2005 at 12:39, bobli said...
As a test I also simply added
a .10 delay to each of the actual codes (not the
macros) and this immediately stopped them from
working so in this case no alias is involved.
I don't know for sure regarding an MX-3000, but with other brands of universal the difference between a single signal and that signal plus .10 delay is duration of the signal itself.
With just the signal assigned to a button, the transmitted duration of the signal depends on the duration of the button press used to send it.
With a signal plus a .10 delay assigned to a button, the transmitted duration of the signal does not depend on the duration of the button press used to send it.
I don't know enough about the MX-3000 to know what duration will be used under those conditions nor what you can do to take control of that detail.
You may be able to verify that you have a duration problem by using the working button (without the .10 delay) in a very short press. It should be possible to press and release fast enough to match the fraction of a second that a macro would use. We expect that to fail to operate the device (because the macro fails).
On December 28, 2005 at 16:09, bobli said...
The learned
hex codes, imported from a pronto ccf file, all
work flawlessly.
Do those work even with the .10 delay attached?
If so then it should be possible to contruct Pronto Hex for the discrete codes that will work equally well. Then ProntoEdit or IrPanels is needed to get those codes into a ccf so the universal browser can access them.
Do you have a url for the ccf file you used? And which device/panel within that ccf had the working codes? Once I get a look at those details I can give you better advice on how to get the discrete codes working.