|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | My great tech support story. Gotta love Universal! This thread has 28 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 29. |
|
| Post 16 made on Saturday March 19, 2005 at 12:16 |
Glackowitz RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | May 2002 3,784 |
|
|
On 03/18/05 16:24 ET, Bill_Killed said...
I guess you didn't buy your remote from ebay, right ? Or They don't care anymore ? I was at training the last few days and mentioned that the MX3000 was available on ebay and Margarita( instructor) said she was going to have a few people from URC look into it and said if it was a dealer that they were probably going to lose the line. I guess if it was a used one that a customer listed, there wouldnt be much they could do?? Glack
|
There's no worse feeling than that millisecond you're sure you are going to die after leaning your chair back a little too far. |
|
| Post 17 made on Saturday March 19, 2005 at 12:22 |
Steve Garn Senior Member |
Joined: Posts: | November 2003 1,319 |
|
|
Most remotes tends to rattle a bit when they're dropped. I always check the edges when people say there is something wrong with they're remote. Usually find a scuff or dent.
If you check out URC's site or have seen them at CES or Cedia you'll discover they manufacture a wagonload of remotes for many companies from HK to Scientific Atlanta with the same tight quality standards.
I am amazed they last as long as they do. I've seen remotes that still work that I won't even touch (you know, the ones that have grease and buggers all over them).
Cudos to URC for the hundred of remotes we've programmed and the thousands they've manufactured that work inspite of they're abuse.
This industry can really make a person cynical over a short period of time because of companies like Monster or Bose (since we're naming names..).
|
Manuals?! We don't need no stinking manuals! a.. er.. |
|
| Post 18 made on Saturday March 19, 2005 at 17:30 |
I have had many MX series remotes over the years. They all have worked execellent. The only problem I have had was with the base station for my MX-800. I called URC and they exchanged my base model for a newer version one that dealt better with some interference that was introduced by my Moto 6412 DVR. I paid for the shipping to them and they paid to ship a brand new unit back to me. The unit was over 12 months old; however, they never asked for an invoice or anything else. I have never had an experience like that with another manufacture, they are great. By the way the RF base station worked fine until I got the Comcast DVR which came out 14 months after I purchased my remote.
I am now going to upgrade my two MX-500's (that still work great) to the MX-850's. Once you start using the MX editor software, you will never be satisfied manually programming a remote. I have read here lately that there were some issues with the most recent update, but they have worked very hard to fix those problems and made available past downloads until the current versions are fixed. I have used the software for many years and couldn't be happier with it.
I am not a professional installer, but really enjoying working on my own systems. I couldn't even begin to count the number of remotes I have purchased over the years, but I can say that the URC's are the best I have used and the only ones I have purchased over the last couple years. These have definitely been the best value investment I have made in my home theater systems (I have 3 in my house!).
These guys are great!
Kris Dunning
|
|
| Post 19 made on Sunday March 20, 2005 at 18:12 |
Yeti Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2004 651 |
|
|
I have sold and programmed many URCs and not one has failed in the field yet. I have had two that were bad immediately after programming. I own a URC and I love it. HTM really has a great line up, now as far as the comments made so far, everyone is entitiled to thier opinion and when posting here on these awesome forums, I hope I would feel safe that no one would tear my post apart for putting in my two cents.
Regarding the original topic, sounds like HTM love thier clients and really wish to keep them happy.
Good job HTM.
|
Regards,
Glen ___________________ Happiness is living in a padded room with a ball. |
|
| Post 20 made on Sunday March 20, 2005 at 23:07 |
mr2channel Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2002 1,701 |
|
|
URC-HTM...GREAT products with terrific tech support, and for the love of GOD they have Eric Johnson!!!! Could you ask for anything more??!! I have sold and programmed LOTS of remotes for various clients, and not ONCE have I ever had a problem or complaint. If you think that URC-HTM has issues, dig a little into the pronto forums and check out the debacle that goes on with the many black screen of death issues that they have, and when you are done, try calling their tech support, and say you have a problem, I think you could hold a better conversation with a brick wall.
my 02
|
What part of "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." do you not understand? |
|
| Post 21 made on Monday March 21, 2005 at 17:32 |
Yeti Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2004 651 |
|
|
lol mr2channel, brick wall eh.
|
Regards,
Glen ___________________ Happiness is living in a padded room with a ball. |
|
| Post 22 made on Monday March 21, 2005 at 17:47 |
tippy-tie Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2004 479 |
|
|
bcf1963...... been scared away by his own ignorance?
|
|
| Post 23 made on Monday March 21, 2005 at 18:02 |
bcf1963 Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2004 2,767 |
|
|
Sorry that many of you on this board are unable to hold a reasonable conversation and talk about the issues in a sane manner without resorting to insults!
Enjoy your little love fest of their product here on this board... and God help anyone that might disagree with you!
And no, I have no financial stake in any company that manufactures or makes remote controls.
|
|
| Post 24 made on Wednesday March 23, 2005 at 12:53 |
HappyWithURC Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2004 83 |
|
|
On 03/21/05 18:02 ET, bcf1963 said...
Sorry that many of you on this board are unable to hold a reasonable conversation and talk about the issues in a sane manner without resorting to insults!
Enjoy your little love fest of their product here on this board... and God help anyone that might disagree with you!
And no, I have no financial stake in any company that manufactures or makes remote controls. Funny thig is bcf, IMHO nobody has insulted you at all!. We all just happen to love URC products and service You have brought to the table some less than impressive stats PPC testing and failure rate. Again, its clear that your out numbered here. URC product is among the best..and yes things break, but Its quite unfair of you to suggest that the URC guys dont test their work, just becuase someones light broke twice. bottom line!!
|
|
| Post 25 made on Wednesday March 23, 2005 at 14:49 |
JOEPerri Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2005 39 |
|
|
On March 19th DDeca wrote
"Umm, what name exactly were you called?? How about now...you seem like a miserable, over-sensitive, impossible to please, snob"
Not looking for an argument or taking sides, but if that was not an uncalled for insult I don't know what is. Keep your statements factual and your argument has more validity.
|
|
| Post 26 made on Wednesday March 23, 2005 at 15:38 |
crrink Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2003 15 |
|
|
I got my first MX-500 over 4 years ago. It's gone through two firmware updates, the broken backlight problem, and lots and lots of heavy use. The remote has been great, and HTM's customer service has been absolutely first rate. Until now (cue ominous music!) I recently added a Moxi DVR to my setup, and as most of you probably know, the 500 can't control it without a firmware update. I Sent the remote in as before, no problems, but when it came back, I noticed that whoever handles the pre-programmed codes at HTM decided to pretty much randomly assign the commands to the 500. Most (but not all) of the transport functions are on the correct buttons, but the LCD buttons are as random as it gets. Since you have to use a P-Pro code, you have no ability (that I'm aware of, and I do have IR-Clone) to affect command placement. I sent a polite e-mail letting HTM know that I thought this was a little odd, and asked if it was possible to have the device set up more logically, or if there was any way at all that I could get the setup to work better for me. I received no reply at all. Not even an acknowledgement that they got my message.
I bought a Harmony 680 a few days later, and it's doing a much better job of controlling my setup than the 500 was able to do.
Anyway, I think they're a great company, and I'll still consider their remotes in the future, but I won't be buying one in the near term, unfortunately.
|
|
| Post 27 made on Wednesday March 23, 2005 at 15:50 |
HappyWithURC Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2004 83 |
|
|
On 03/23/05 14:49 ET, JOEPerri said...
On March 19th DDeca wrote
"Umm, what name exactly were you called?? How about now...you seem like a miserable, over-sensitive, impossible to please, snob"
Not looking for an argument or taking sides, but if that was not an uncalled for insult I don't know what is. Keep your statements factual and your argument has more validity. My fault...didnt realize that ddeca insulted him...but seriously, I believe my point is still as valid! I guess its technically impossible for a company to empress everyone they deal with. Ive had great service from URC...and thats my 2Cents
|
|
| Post 28 made on Thursday March 24, 2005 at 17:22 |
Scott Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2001 164 |
|
|
I must admit, I have sent them a couple emails over the years....commenting on how I like the old thumbpad/select button, rather than the one with the gemstone buttons. I own 2 MX-500's with the older one being the one I like best.....you can hit the select button with confidence that you will select the correct thing. On the newer one, I often select the incorrect item because the thumbpad toggles either up/down/left/right. I asked them in the emails, if there is anything they can do that can fix it, perhaps even sending it back to them, for them to put a new thumbpad (preferrably the older type), and although I have filled out more than one of their email support forms.....I have never received any answer from them.
Overall I think the quality of the remotes is good, having owned them for many years......without any other problems (besides that one design flaw). My only other complaint is the lack of dedicated menu/info/guide/exit buttons. The newer/better models have them, but then you lose the m1, m2, m3 buttons as well as losing the skip left/skip right buttons which I like for my dvd player and vcr.
|
|
| Post 29 made on Thursday March 24, 2005 at 18:27 |
ljckbailey Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2003 285 |
|
|
I two love my mx-3000. It's my first URC and I am very happy with it. I owned a pronto for six years previous. I had a few problems early on and tried the email approach for service and I must admit that never got a response either. But happily, their phone support is a different story. As long as you get the right guy your problems are over.
Lane
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|