| Post 31 made on Wednesday September 1, 2004 at 18:12 |
GregoriusM RC Consultant |
Joined: Posts: | December 1999 9,804 |
|
|
Let's all remember folks that the MSRP of the MX-500 was and may still be $189.00, if I remember correctly, and many, many people were thrilled when the price was "down" to $139.
So, the MX-500 that you're getting at $100 or lower is the better version of the ones that many paid upwards of $140 for.
Now, I don't want to get into a discussion on what each person thinks is a fair price for a remote. I'm only diving into this conversation so that we know that even the online stores who are certified by HTM/URC are giving a great deal, and the warranty is included.
Greg
|
When ignorance is bliss, ‘tis folly to be wise. |
|
| Post 32 made on Wednesday September 1, 2004 at 20:03 |
Johnny Canuck Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2003 292 |
|
|
Read the fine print is a very good point and eakf also raises another one about setting your own reasonable criteria for when to purchase an extended warranty. My criteria might not be exactly the same, and I would add one more point ... what are the odds that you will not want to upgrade the unit, but would prefer next generation, by the time the warranty runs out (on less expensive purchases ... not big ticket items).
That said, I can attest to very good treatment from my Gold MasterCard on a 30 day purchase protection claim (dropped my brand new Maui Jim's and scratched the lenses ... MC said no problem and reimbursed me for the replacement purchase as soon as I sent them the damaged shades). I can also say that Amex treated me very well on an extended warranty claim (although I can't remember what the claim was).
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.