|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | 8ohm Outdoor Sub Speaker Wire Gauge This thread has 23 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 24. |
|
| Post 16 made on Friday July 28, 2017 at 23:42 |
cshepard Advanced Member |
Joined:
Posts: | June 2008
767 |
|
|
We recently finished a system for a NASCAR driver. 8x Episode 6" 70v landscape speakers & 1x 12" 8ohm burial sub. The wire run for the sub is almost 200' and is 12/2. The sub sounds great, now that we finally figured out that the crossover on the correct DSP preset on the CDi2000 was set at 1,200 Hz from the factory!!!
|
Chris |
|
| Post 17 made on Saturday July 29, 2017 at 12:12 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined:
Posts: | December 2001
30,076 |
|
|
On July 28, 2017 at 23:42, cshepard said...
We recently finished a system for a NASCAR driver. 8x Episode 6" 70v landscape speakers & 1x 12" 8ohm burial sub. The wire run for the sub is almost 200' and is 12/2. The sub sounds great, now that we finally figured out that the crossover on the correct DSP preset on the CDi2000 was set at 1,200 Hz from the factory!!! What did you change it to? It's always helpful once you've found a problem to state what the solution was.
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| OP | Post 18 made on Sunday July 30, 2017 at 09:10 |
imt Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | June 2007
466 |
|
|
On July 28, 2017 at 23:42, cshepard said...
We recently finished a system for a NASCAR driver. 8x Episode 6" 70v landscape speakers & 1x 12" 8ohm burial sub. The wire run for the sub is almost 200' and is 12/2. The sub sounds great, now that we finally figured out that the crossover on the correct DSP preset on the CDi2000 was set at 1,200 Hz from the factory!!! The 1,200hz preset was the way the Amp came or that was in the ST6_SB12 DSP preset for the 12" sub in ch1 & 6" sats on ch 2? I was onsite yesterday and was just running some doubled up 12" from the rack to the panel I have on the inside, which contains the TPD Speaker Surge Module before the wires exit to the exterior. However, the terminals can't handle the thickness of the doubled up 12ga.
|
|
| Post 19 made on Sunday July 30, 2017 at 10:21 |
Mogul Senior Member |
Joined:
Posts: | May 2010
1,164 |
|
|
On July 28, 2017 at 23:42, cshepard said...
We recently finished a system for a NASCAR driver. 8x Episode 6" 70v landscape speakers & 1x 12" 8ohm burial sub. The wire run for the sub is almost 200' and is 12/2. The sub sounds great, now that we finally figured out that the crossover on the correct DSP preset on the CDi2000 was set at 1,200 Hz from the factory!!! Name the NASCAR driver or it didn't happen.
Last edited by Mogul on July 30, 2017 12:01.
|
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble." [Sir Henry Royce] |
|
| Post 20 made on Sunday July 30, 2017 at 11:15 |
cshepard Advanced Member |
Joined:
Posts: | June 2008
767 |
|
|
On July 30, 2017 at 09:10, imt said...
The 1,200hz preset was the way the Amp came or that was in the ST6_SB12 DSP preset for the 12" sub in ch1 & 6" sats on ch 2?
It was in the ST6_SB12 DSP preset. Ernie, I'll have to ask rr61522 what he changed it to, but i think we ended up at 90 Hz
|
Chris |
|
| Post 21 made on Sunday July 30, 2017 at 11:24 |
cshepard Advanced Member |
Joined:
Posts: | June 2008
767 |
|
|
On July 30, 2017 at 10:21, Mogul said...
Name the NASCAR driver it it didn't happen. Haha, no.
|
Chris |
|
| Post 22 made on Monday July 31, 2017 at 13:28 |
g007 Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | October 2015
87 |
|
|
Ernie
Rethink that "resistance losses are the square of the current" Then read the last sentence in that paragraph!
|
|
| Post 23 made on Monday July 31, 2017 at 13:42 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined:
Posts: | December 2001
30,076 |
|
|
On July 31, 2017 at 13:28, g007 said...
Ernie
Rethink that "resistance losses are the square of the current" Then read the last sentence in that paragraph! I'm all for critiquing what I wrote, but.... I rethought it, and I should have said "resistance losses are directly proportional to the square of the current," which is pretty much the same thing; and If you want me to critique my writing, please at least quote it or point out which post you're referring to. Thanks.
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| Post 24 made on Monday July 31, 2017 at 13:55 |
g007 Long Time Member |
Joined:
Posts: | October 2015
87 |
|
|
Ernie
It should read "POWER losses are proportional to the square of the current." I'm not interested in the grammar at this point.
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|
