Recently configured 3 Ubiquiti unifi ap's for zero handoff roaming with no issues so far. Using wifi analyzer app I roamed from AP to AP. The ap showed only 1 ap, and no evidence via mac address or anything of a handoff other than signal strength. It looked like cell tower handoff on a phone. Signal strength indicator showed decreasing number of bars until the switch, then back to full strength.
[Link: dl.ubnt.com]I attended a webinar on their features they hosted several months ago. In it they discussed multi-level deployments in dorms, hotels, etc. Their recommendation was to use the low powered AP's in numbers rather than the longer range models. Their testing indicated it worked better because of the lower powered handsets being used. Although they can broadcast signals to a distant handset, the weaker handset signal was often weaker and performance negatively impacted as a result.
Sounds a lot like cellular pico cell deployment.
"A picocell is a small cellular basestation typically covering a small area, such as in-building (offices, shopping malls, train stations, stock exchanges, etc.), or more recently in-aircraft. In cellular networks, picocells are typically used to extend coverage to indoor areas where outdoor signals do not reach well, or to add network capacity in areas with very dense phone usage, such as train stations. Picocells provide coverage and capacity in areas difficult or expensive to reach using the more traditional Macrocell approach.[1]
In cellular wireless networks, such as GSM, the picocell base station[2] is typically a low cost, small (typically the size of a ream of A4 paper), reasonably simple unit that connects to a Base Station Controller (BSC). Multiple picocell 'heads' connect to each BSC: the BSC performs radio resource management and hand-over functions, and aggregates data to be passed to the Mobile Switching Centre (MSC) and/or the Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN).
Connectivity between the picocell heads and the BSC typically consists of in-building wiring. Although originally deployed systems (1990s) used PDH links such as E1/T1 links, more recent systems use Ethernet cabling. Aircraft use satellite links.[3]
More recent work has developed the concept towards a head unit containing not only a picocell, but also many of the functions of the BSC and some of the MSC. This form of picocell is sometimes called an access point base station or 'enterprise femtocell'. In this case, the unit contains all the capability required to connect directly to the Internet, without the need for the BSC/MSC infrastructure. This is potentially a more cost effective approach.
Picocells offer many of the benefits of "small cells" (similar to femtocells) in that they improve data throughput for mobile users and increase capacity in the mobile network. In particular, the integration of picocells with macrocells through a Heterogeneous Network can be useful in seamless handoffs and increased mobile data capacity.[4]"