|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | Identify this! This thread has 20 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15. |
|
| Post 1 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 14:41 |
cassidycaid Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2001 256 |
|
|
I have a guess, but it's just a guess. Anyone want to share some insight?
|
Scientific method refers to the body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. |
|
| Post 2 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 14:50 |
longshot16 Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | November 2009 3,439 |
|
|
Bomb?
|
The Unicorn Whisperer |
|
| Post 3 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 14:51 |
ichbinbose Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2011 1,822 |
|
|
flaux capicitor?
where is the Mr. Fusion?
|
|
| Post 4 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 14:55 |
Rated M Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2012 42 |
|
|
|
| Post 5 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 14:57 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,076 |
|
|
Looks like a multi-stage filter, but what's weird is that the frequencies were we usually use RG6 have such high frequencies that those cans are ridiculously oversized. Similar, but still smaller, filter cans were used in a TRF AM receiver from the late twenties that I had back in the 1960s.
I say RG6 because that's what it looks like, seeing the wire next to the F connectors. I note the F connectors are old crimp style, so this could be twenty years old. That's still no excuse for those huge cans. [I know, I know, I said huge cans.]
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| Post 6 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 15:04 |
GotGame Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2002 4,008 |
|
|
I cannot tell by the size, but my guess is they are tuning cans for duplexed receiver and transmitter to the same antenna. Bandpass and notch filters.
Strike that.
They all have RG6 and crimp connectors, so most likely headend notch filters for Cable television.
|
I may be schizophrenic, but at least I have each other. |
|
| Post 7 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 15:29 |
ericspencer Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2011 532 |
|
|
|
| Post 8 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 15:37 |
bcf1963 Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2004 2,767 |
|
|
I'm not sure if the connectors are F or SO-239. Here's a picture of an SO-239 connector, often referred to as a UHF connector.  Another clue involves that all the items are connected in series, so there is a single input and output. As the items are all in series, that does away with the possibility that it is a duplexer for transmitter and receiver to the same antenna. A duplexer would normally have 3 connectors open, one for the antenna, one for the transmitter, and one for the receiver. The cans look like high quality notch filters. So I am assuming that these are notch filters, with each can tuned to a seperate notch frequency. Could be on the head end input to an apartment building or hotel where all the rooms get the same cable TV service.
|
|
| Post 9 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 16:11 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,076 |
|
|
If they were SO-239s, the cable, being almost as large in diameter as the connector, could not possibly be bent and twisted in radii as small as in the photo. I've not seen many connectors for SO-239s, but I doubt there are crimp connectors for them. I vote for F connectors.
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| OP | Post 10 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 16:22 |
cassidycaid Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2001 256 |
|
|
On August 1, 2012 at 15:29, ericspencer said...
THis would be it [Link: microwavefilter.com]That certainly looks like it. They are F connectors in and out. This is a large, old home that we are doing an extensive A/V remodel on. The unit in question is attached to the wall next to the spaghetti mess of the cable distro. Can anyone explain what it would be used for or should I just remove it.
|
Scientific method refers to the body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. |
|
| Post 11 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 16:30 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,076 |
|
|
Just remove it. Let's say you were using a normal antenna system, but wanted to modulate a laser disc into the house. You could use a channel 3 modulator, but the problem with them is the lower sideband, which interfere(d) with channel 2. This filter, if set up as a single channel pass filter, could be used to remove the lower sideband and allow channel 3.
However, I did such a thing in the nineties, and we used an active single-rack space filter that cost $300 at that time. If that's right, the thing you've got is much older than that, probably from the days of cable (because of the crimp F connectors) but early on, before active devices were readily available. Maybe 1985.
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| Post 12 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 21:21 |
TouchCommander Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2004 597 |
|
|
It is a micro wave filter part called the brick. I just took out the one used at the Arizona Cardinals Stadium. It was used to block channels that the owner did not want or the the installer was inserting new channels where he,she wanted. Take it out and build your own system.
|
No job to small, many to big |
|
| Post 13 made on Wednesday August 1, 2012 at 22:49 |
mcn779 Senior Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2003 1,070 |
|
|
|
| Post 14 made on Thursday August 2, 2012 at 10:09 |
juliejacobson CE Pro Magazine |
Joined: Posts: | April 2003 3,032 |
|
|
On August 1, 2012 at 14:57, Ernie Gilman said...
[I know, I know, I said huge cans.] ^ He said huge cans.
|
"CEPro: your website sucks!" - Fins www.cepro.com[Link: twitter.com] |
|
| Post 15 made on Thursday August 2, 2012 at 12:33 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,076 |
|
|
I can count on you, Julie!
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|