|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
|
Will wireless microphones interfere with...
| |
|
| Topic: | Will wireless microphones interfere with URC MRF350 RF? This thread has 10 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
| Post 1 made on Wednesday February 8, 2012 at 08:55 |
FP Crazy Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | June 2003 2,914 |
|
|
I'm sorta ignorant about the technology behind wireless microphones, specifically the frequencies they operate at.
I have a commercial job I need to revamp, that currently employ 2 wireless microphones (that are working well) and I want to use a URC MX980/MRF350 combination for control, but I'm worried that the wireless mics might interfere.
I think they are Nady mics but I will get more info on these wireless mics and post back...but does anyone know enough about wireless mics to think there will be any issues? URC RF is 418 and 433.
|
Chasing Ernie's post count, one useless post at a time. |
|
| Post 2 made on Wednesday February 8, 2012 at 09:46 |
John Williams Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2010 280 |
|
|
Wireless mics used to operate mostly in the UHF band. Since the digital transition, most mics operate in the VHF band now. 418 and 433 are in between these frequencies have been set aside by the government for low powered, short transmission devices; such as remotes, garage door openers, etc... I don't believe those frequencies are an option for any wireless mic systems (certainly not the big brands).
|
|
| Post 3 made on Wednesday February 8, 2012 at 16:40 |
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | November 2003 7,429 |
|
|
Only time I ever had a problem with wireless mikes was when the batteries were weak.
At that point they will do some very strange things (picking up CB radio signals, FM transmission, etc, etc.)...
|
|
| Post 4 made on Wednesday February 8, 2012 at 16:54 |
Fred Harding Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2001 3,430 |
|
|
I'd be astonished. Model number of the Nady will allow us to find the frequency to be absolutely sure.
Plan B is to replace mics, of course.
|
On the West Coast of Wisconsin |
|
| Post 5 made on Thursday February 9, 2012 at 00:21 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,076 |
|
|
Actually, if these working mics have been in place for quite a while, Plan A is to replace them, as they probably do not work on the new frequencies and are thus illegal. Will anyone catch them if they don't replace them? Probably not.
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| Post 6 made on Thursday February 9, 2012 at 07:37 |
tsvisser Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | March 2002 1,228 |
|
|
In my experience, most wireless mics are UHF but upper frequencies have been banned, like upper 700 and 800 MHz. I Have units that operate in the 600 MHz range. Most of my peers use units that are the same or more common, a few blocks below mine.
|
|
|
| Post 7 made on Thursday February 9, 2012 at 07:58 |
Mr Griffiths It's my lucky day! |
Joined: Posts: | February 2005 2,678 |
|
|
|
| Post 8 made on Thursday February 9, 2012 at 09:02 |
Fred Harding Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2001 3,430 |
|
|
On February 9, 2012 at 00:21, Ernie Gilman said...
Actually, if these working mics have been in place for quite a while, Plan A is to replace them, as they probably do not work on the new frequencies and are thus illegal. Will anyone catch them if they don't replace them? Probably not. Here's an article that addresses what Ernie is alluding to. [Link: cepro.com]
|
On the West Coast of Wisconsin |
|
| Post 9 made on Thursday February 9, 2012 at 10:35 |
Gman-north Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2009 2,211 |
|
|
On February 9, 2012 at 00:21, Ernie Gilman said...
Actually, if these working mics have been in place for quite a while, Plan A is to replace them, as they probably do not work on the new frequencies and are thus illegal. Will anyone catch them if they don't replace them? Probably not. +1...The mics need to operate on frequencies that are FCC compliant [Link: fcc.gov]
|
|
|
| Post 10 made on Thursday February 9, 2012 at 11:30 |
Ernie Gilman Yes, That Ernie! |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 30,076 |
|
|
On February 9, 2012 at 07:58, Mr Griffiths said...
i have used the xdv70 and it sounds phenominal for the money This phrasing never sounds comforting to me. It always sounds like someone just said "cheap crap" after saying "well, hell, we'll live with it." I work with a guy who was just awarded being the permanent sole supplier for microphones for events for a large (LARGE) auto dealership after some of the dealers' guys tried to save some money and bought a mic that was "good for the price" and totally blew chunks. On February 9, 2012 at 10:35, Gman-north said...
+1...The mics need to operate on frequencies that are FCC compliant Pardon my repetition and sharpening of the point here, but every wireless mic that you have ever bought anywhere legitimate operated on FCC compliant frequencies (note the past tense there). The issue is that the FCC recently changed the frequencies, basically making every old wireless mic in the US into a piece of illegal trash. It's up to the user to work out if they have to replace their mics to be legal; as a practical matter it's also up to them to decide if they care. I think this rule change was an onerous thing to put upon small churches and other non-profits. Seems to me I just heard a piece of news about a government policy that more or less attacks churches, so I'm not surprised.
|
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything. "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw |
|
| Post 11 made on Friday February 10, 2012 at 05:14 |
Mr Griffiths It's my lucky day! |
Joined: Posts: | February 2005 2,678 |
|
|
Ernie , I do not know ,the use of the mic , if its for speech, for singing for mic ing up something else.
when i say its phenomenal for the money i am comparing it to shure heil and Neumann mics not cheap crap. I did test this against a nady mic a UHF 10 and it blew it out of the water for vocalists as the capsules are interchangable yoiu can use the transmission and reception part but actually hacve the mic capsule from a higher spec mic ..
I have used these and i would not recommend anything that was crap.
being digital and on those frequencies its unlikely that any body or organisation in the world is going to say you cant use those... as they are doing with standard UHF VHF mics in various parts of the world not just the USA.
the proof of the pudding is in the eating..
so my advise is that if they fit the bill at least test them before making your final decision.
|
|
|
 |
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|