Interesting response. Mogul said:

The issue of climate change has been politiced by powers that want a one world government, being used to gain control of all of us and transfer wealth. Read 'Agenda 21' as proof.

Climate scientists come to false conclusions be cause they are corrupted by grant money.

Since there is so much consensus it proves that the issue is unresolved because that many scientists can't possibly all agree.

So who are the fools? 

People who believe that human caused climate change is real?

Or, people who think that climate change is way for a one world government to take over the world in some super communist heirarchy, that the scientific community is corrupted by grant money, and there must be something wrong if the scientists all agree?

This is somewhat relevant because it shows faulty thinking based on a misunderstanding of science reinforced by faulty logic then regurgitated ad nauseum on the internet. Which is what happens with climate science, so it's not entirely off topic.

If you came from your parents, why are there still parents? Do your parents die when you are born? No. They continue to live, just as you do.

Species evolve. This does not mean a common ancestor is necessarily replaced by new species. This is not how evolution works. Common ancestry between primates and humans is studied and accepted science, as previous species of humans and primates showing common traits continue to be found. So we did not come from today's apes: today's apes, and humans, came from a common ancestor or species.

But I sense your question was merely a rhetorical one.

Here's the text for Agenda 21.

As a working blueprint for countries of the world to agree on sustainable development issues and the environment, it would seem a sensible thing for all the countries to meet and hash out agreements on their respective impacts on the planet since we will be at about 9 billion people in our lifetimes.

So what part of this agenda is so problematic? Or is the whole thing just a blueprint for a 'one world government?'

In 1928 Edward Bernays (Us world war two propeganda minister and architect of global modern advertising) wrote:

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.”

According to ancient aliens we have been modified to well become human. It's just a theory

OK here is some science....The problem with apes and man is that there is not just  a couple of missing links, there are about 20 - 30 deep missing between ape and man. Further, man has 46 chromosomes, apes have 48. The spookiest part about mans 46 chromosomes is that the first base pair are fused together. If they were not fused we would have 48 chromosomes. No other creature on the planet has a fused base chromosome pair. You could run all kinds of directions with this but within the confines of modern science nobody has a clue what to do with this knowledge and those who do, more likely than not,  are afraid to even try to speculate in front of their peers. Wherefore, most scientists fall back on old accepted dogma to avoid being blacklisted.

The term 'conspiracy theorist' has acquired a decidedly negative connotation.

Is this the result of a conpiracy, to silence those that question?

LOL the crazy part about that "theory" is that scientists didn't make it up. The anti-science morons made it up and now they use it as an argument against evolution. Whenever I ask someone where they heard it they say "the scientists" lol. I then ask "which scientists?". No one ever responds after that. No scientist ever in history ever never ever said we evolved from apes.

The founding fathers of this country, were by definition  conspiracy theorists

Its not so much evolution that should be debated but the origin of first life. The religious community gets all out of shape about Darwin, but Darwin never said anything about where life came from first he only addressed the evolution of living things. What people should be more concerned about is that Darwin stole most of his work from Lamark and a brilliant botanist named Wallace. Wallace sent all of his research to Darwin asking for a second opinion before he published this work. Darwin a year thereafter published Origin of Species and then said sorry I only received your research the other day, to bad so sad.

Maybe first life came from aliens. Or magic.

Magic aliens?

Its just a theory! Like gravity!

"If you are paranoid about one world government or the UN, how do you feel about giant corporations creating PR campaigns denying science that will impact the planet?"

I see that you have bought-in to the rhetorical talking points of the Liberal media, Progressive Academia and the Democrat Party as regards the "Evil Corporations..." I do not fear Corporations [merely formal organizations of fellow-citizens engaged in efforts to earn a living] at all. I DO fear government for one simple reason: The government holds a monopoly on force.

Simply put, if I don't like the actions of a business, I stop buying their product and, in the event of some damage to me, my family or property, I execute legal action against the business for restitution or to incite protection by my government. If I don't like the actions of my government, however, I'm utterly SCREWED since non-compliance on my part begets the barrel of an M-16 and a jail cell.

The only manner in which a "Corporation" can become corrupt in such a way as to inflict irreparable harm on me is to do so in concert with government, thereby co-opting power of Governmental force.

Government regulation on business necessarily yields lobbyists, corruption between lobbyists and government agents then yields regulation for the purposes of competitive advantage and limitations on market competition from corporations without the means of political manipulation and, ultimately, we the people suffer.

You and I both agree that there are "Evil Corporations..."  I understand, however, that "Evil Corporations" cannot flourish without the corrupt force of law to allow their escape from the wrath of the free market and from EQUAL justice of the courts on our behalf.

I didn't hear it from "the scientists", i heard it from Steven Wright the comedian

Soooooooooo Big poppa you would be correct!

Puff Puff Give Muthafr your Fin up the rotation

I enjoy these theory threads but like to lighten it up a bit.

And are we not suposed to be talking about smoke detectors?

This place is the shiz to my nit

And when mother nature is ready, she will get rid of people, we will not have much to say about it.