|
|
 |
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
| Topic: | OT / Who Really Shot Kennedy???? This thread has 251 replies. Displaying posts 61 through 75. |
|
| Post 61 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 12:19 |
39 Cent Stamp Elite Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2007 17,501 |
|
|
On January 11, 2010 at 00:19, Fins said...
Third question, if you were planning a conspiracy and were going to need to change a coffin, wouldnt you make sure you had the same type? People powerful enough and smart enough to pull off killing the president wouldnt make sure to use the same type of coffins? Maybe they put the new guy on coffin duty and he screwed it up? Ever think about that? The worst part of conspiracy theories is that everyone keeps grilling you for facts to back up your psychotic claims. Its not fair!
|
Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps |
|
| Post 62 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 13:54 |
Gizmologist09 Advanced Member |
|
|
Well kiddies, since most of you are saying nothing aside from "there was no conspiracy", on what do you base that statement?
The Warren Commission said no, but perhaps you may want to look up the members of the commission and their political activities/histories.
Second, the latest congressional investigation said there WAS evidence and the WC got a LOT of info wrong and destroyed information and refused to interview critical witnesses.
So who is right the 1st or the 2nd and how do YOU know?
|
|
| Post 63 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 15:44 |
Fins Elite Member |
Joined: Posts: | June 2007 11,621 |
|
|
You havent provided anything to prove there was a conspiracy, other than coincidental anticdotal evidence.
And I did offer a very good source for you. Dr. Michael Baden. Go research what he said when he was brought in to look at the evidence again.
|
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.
|
|
| Post 64 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 17:28 |
Karl Lafong Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2010 31 |
|
|
If you care to look, you will find pictures of a bullet hole in the windshield of the Dallas Lincoln limo, which is proof positive of a conspiracy.
The coffin switch is well known, and allowed for further mutilation of the remains prior to the autopsy. Are you aware that the Dallas coroner was prevented from doing an autopsy in Texas despite the state law requiring such an act.
JFKs brain was likely destroyed to prevent forensic proof of the shooters locations.
Several of the Dallas doctors all stated that the fatal wound entered in the right front temple of JFKs head. Some also made reference to the front throat wound, later obscured by a 'tracheotomy' incision.
And yes, dozens of witnesses suddenly died of auto accidents, heart attacks and 'suicides'. Just as happened to so many other witnesses right before they were to appear before an investigation board under oath.
Like LHO said, he was "just a patsy".
Yes, the book is JFK and the Unspeakable. A great starting point for those who want to know the truth.
No, I do not post here under multiple names.
|
|
| Post 65 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 17:39 |
2nd rick Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2002 4,521 |
|
|
On January 11, 2010 at 13:54, Gizmologist09 said...
the latest congressional investigation said there WAS evidence and the WC got a LOT of info wrong and destroyed information and refused to interview critical witnesses. On January 11, 2010 at 15:44, Fins said...
You havent provided anything to prove there was a conspiracy, other than coincidental anticdotal evidence. I would hardly call a Congressional investigation anecdotal (or "anticdotal"). If you heard a dude on the corner say that "monkeys killed JFK with blowdarts", that's a person telling you an anecdote. Without further investigation to prove/disprove this claim, it can only be considered anecdotal evidence. A structured investigation, especially a Congressional investigation, is not anecdotal.
|
Rick Murphy Troy, MI |
|
| Post 66 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 17:42 |
39 Cent Stamp Elite Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2007 17,501 |
|
|
Hundreds of millions believe that the bible was hand written by God. So yeah... IMO you can get a few loons to go a long with just about anything.
|
Avid Stamp Collector - I really love 39 Cent Stamps |
|
| Post 67 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 18:52 |
Totem Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2009 467 |
|
|
On January 11, 2010 at 17:42, 39 Cent Stamp said...
Hundreds of millions believe that the bible was hand written by God. So yeah... IMO you can get a few loons to go a long with just about anything. You mean it wasn't??????? I just thought God waited 300 years to edit it.
|
|
| Post 68 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 20:38 |
davidcasemore Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2003 3,347 |
|
|
On January 11, 2010 at 17:42, 39 Cent Stamp said...
Hundreds of millions believe that the bible was hand written by God. That is SUCH B*** S***! I saw a bible with my own eyes the last time I stayed in a hotel (at CEDIA) and the text was clearly NOT hand written. It looked more like some kind of typewriter or printing press did it. It was sure old though. The pages were so thin! I ran out of Zig-Zags so they came in handy.
|
Fins: Still Slamming' His Trunk on pilgrim's Small Weenie - One Trunk at a Time! |
|
| Post 69 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 21:46 |
phil Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2001 2,162 |
|
|
Oswald couldn't have done, he was playing a gig at the time.
|
"Regarding surround sound, I know musicians too well to want them behind my back." -Walter Becker |
|
| Post 70 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 22:09 |
roddymcg Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | September 2003 6,796 |
|
|
On January 11, 2010 at 20:38, davidcasemore said...
That is SUCH B*** S***! I saw a bible with my own eyes the last time I stayed in a hotel (at CEDIA) and the text was clearly NOT hand written. It looked more like some kind of typewriter or printing press did it. It was sure old though. The pages were so thin! I ran out of Zig-Zags so they came in handy. That made for a great laugh, thanks!!
|
When good enough is not good enough. |
|
| Post 71 made on Monday January 11, 2010 at 22:10 |
QQQ Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2002 4,806 |
|
|
On January 11, 2010 at 17:39, 2nd rick said...
I would hardly call a Congressional investigation anecdotal (or "anticdotal").
A structured investigation, especially a Congressional investigation, is not anecdotal. And *what* in the world does stating that a congressional investigation is not anecdotal have anything to do with Fins comment to gizmospiracist?
|
|
| Post 72 made on Tuesday January 12, 2010 at 00:45 |
Gizmologist09 Advanced Member |
|
|
So0, in other words QQQ you have conducted all your own tests, interviews autopsies etc on Kennedy so you have personal proof of nothing remotely suspicious. No? then you must be blindly accepting what a group of politicians said.
BTW there were NO scientists on the commission,. All politicians or political appointees. Todays' forensics would have kicked most of the WC reports in the dumper. All I am saying is that a LARGE scientific community has examined all the evidence and retraced the actions, timelines "coincidences" interviews and filed thousands of FOI requests to get as far as they have. A great deal of the archival records are still unavailable aor come with large portions blacked out.
All the records after the WC reprt was published were ordered sealed by LBJ for 75 years. That has since ben partially voided. If there was nothing suspicious that involved politicians etc in office at the time, why seal the records for 75 years?
Just answer me these questions without the cutesy remarks. They are simple questions you should be able to answer.
Why seal the evidence? Why is the brain missing form a sealed and secure government facility? Why did the Congress conclude after the WC that there was a conspiracy? Why did LBJ order the limo disassembled, repaired steam cleaned and reassembled immediately after the initial evidence gathering? Why did Connolly have bullet fragments in his wrist and thigh from a "pristine" bullet?
Forget all the trajectory, moving target details. Forget the coffin switching. Forget the autopsy pics. (BTW they are now on line and show an intact forehead BUT the Zapruder film shows his right side forehead blown out and the top of the cranium and scalp folded back- verified by the medical techs in Dallas).
Just answer factually answer the questions I posed.
|
|
| Post 73 made on Tuesday January 12, 2010 at 00:59 |
QQQ Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2002 4,806 |
|
|
On January 12, 2010 at 00:45, Gizmologist09 said...
So0, in other words QQQ you have conducted all your own tests, interviews autopsies etc on Kennedy so you have personal proof of nothing remotely suspicious. No? then you must be blindly accepting what a group of politicians said. Um no, one does not logically follow the other except in your bizarro universe. Just answer me these questions without the cutesy remarks. You don't post questions, you post logical fallacies and I have no interest in attempting to answer them other than with cutesy remarks. You just aren't deserving enough. I have a question using your logic. Where was Bill Clinton on the day Kennedy was assassinated? No one seems to remember. Coincidence? I think not!
|
|
| Post 74 made on Tuesday January 12, 2010 at 02:28 |
davidcasemore Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2003 3,347 |
|
|
On January 12, 2010 at 00:59, QQQ said...
Where was Bill Clinton on the day Kennedy was assassinated? No one seems to remember. Bill was pretty young then so nobody noticed when he hopped into the presidential limousine, with an illegal Cuban cigar, and hid under Jackie's skirt. Years later he would recall "That was the grassiest knoll I've ever seen!"
|
Fins: Still Slamming' His Trunk on pilgrim's Small Weenie - One Trunk at a Time! |
|
| Post 75 made on Tuesday January 12, 2010 at 02:40 |
davidcasemore Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2003 3,347 |
|
|
On January 12, 2010 at 00:45, Gizmologist09 said...
All I am saying is that a LARGE scientific community has examined all the evidence and retraced the actions, timelines "coincidences" interviews and filed thousands of FOI requests to get as far as they have. Do tell, is this "LARGE scientific community" the same group of scientists that are warning us about Global Climate Change? Are they wrong about climate change but right about missing brains, musical-chair-coffins, grassy knolls and sinister VPs? Forgive me if I'm wrong (and I really don't want to search for the Global Warming thread), but aren't you a "Global warming is a hoax because the LARGE scientific community is stupid" believer? Are you having it both ways when it suits your needs?
|
Fins: Still Slamming' His Trunk on pilgrim's Small Weenie - One Trunk at a Time! |
|
 |
Thread Closed |
This thread has been locked. Replies are not allowed at this time. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|