| Post 1 made on Tuesday January 20, 2009 at 06:20 |
blakrj Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2005 225 |
|
|
Looks like URC rushed the MX-6000 to market and is still busy working on the product, or at least I certainly hope they still are. It appears that there are a number of things that have not changed much since CCS. I guess they were desperate to release the product. Fundamental bits are still being added, documentation is not current and it is missing stuff. The 'Run Emulator' function doesn't seem to do much (not an emulator as in the MX-3000 editor). It has Wi-Fi, but is not really documented. It has the resolution of a PSP, but no browser. How do you configure the RSS feeds? Perhaps I want my News from a different source. I hope they get busy and it doesn't end up being neglected like the MX-3000 editor. My $0.02
|
|
| Post 2 made on Tuesday January 20, 2009 at 08:20 |
Bubby Advanced Member |
Joined: Posts: | July 2007 942 |
|
|
Its been over a year and there is still no MX-980 manual so I don't think I would stay awake nights waiting on documentation.
|
|
| OP | Post 3 made on Tuesday January 20, 2009 at 09:00 |
blakrj Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | December 2005 225 |
|
|
Yeah, know what you mean. Its more than the documentation. Its simple things like the size of text boxes that cannot be resized; so you can't see the full ID. Its a program layout that has little changed since 2004 (or before). I looked back at some things that were raised as suggestions for UI improvement back in 2006 - none have been addressed. Continuous Improvement cycles are well and truly dead here. Suggest they need to put the program in a usability lab to accept these shortcomings.
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.