On July 24, 2006 at 20:57, johnsfine said...
The two codes you imported that had that two-bit
repeat burst were taken correctly and repeated
because they have that part.
Samples one and two had the repeat part, but sample one did not repeat. Sample two did repeat, but only the first part of the combined code, not the second part.
All NEC1 signals
have that repeat part sent by the remote. The
device is free to ignore that repeat part if repeating
is a bad idea for that particular function. That
decision is in the device, not in the remote (for
other protocols that decision might be in the
remote).
Barring my confusion about sample one versus sample two, this answers my question about the NEC1 protocol--that it is the device which determines the repeats.
