On December 30, 2006 at 17:37, sacpapa said...
Thanks for the reply. However, as I am doing more research
it seems there are other positions than what you propose.
Since the signal (even though it is digital) is sent by
way of radio waves there is the possibility of noise distortion.
An analog effect, nicely countered by digital signal methods. Not noticeable until failure occurs.
There is a direct relation between signal strength, noise
(signal interference) and data loss (bit error rate).
Nicely handled by error correction. Not noticeable until failure occurs.
So the higher the signal strength the less likelyhood
of data loss because of noise distortion.
Yes, but you won't see any difference unless the low signal causes complete failure.
Even though it is transmitted in a digital format, it
still can loose data that will effect quality.
Yes. Until quality is affected by what is sometimes referred to as "going over the cliff," picture quality will be perfect. Going over the cliff is having all transmission problems finally add up to the point where the digital signal is not transmitted properly. At that point the signal does not degrade, it falls apart. Large areas of the screen showing 1/2" or larger squares of solid color, or images freezing; these are failures. Until such a failure happens, the delivered image is identical to the image delivered under perfect signal conditions.
If the noise distortion is great enough (to cause pixelization)
then it is the receiver that actually malfunctions
A receiver that displays a pixelized image because of low signal conditions is not malfunctioning. It's supposed to show a bad image when the signal has failed.
and
is not able to project an accurate image onto the screen,
because the signal is not strong enough for the receiver
to do its job.
The receiver doesn't actually project an image onto the screen. It supplies an electrical signal to allow a display to do that. You may say I'm being picky, but this sentence shows some fuzzy thinking on your part.
Signal strength, as I now understand it, is how well the
dish is pointing toward the satellite and it does have
an effect on the clarity, color, and sharpness of the
picture.
Signal strength is a misnomer on satellite receivers. They actually show signal
quality," an undefined thing that only guarantees that if it is low enough, the image will not come through properly. A client once insisted I add a 10 dB amp to his satellite feed; it distorted the signals, and even though they were 10 dB hotter, the satellite receiver showed a lower "signal level." What happened was that distortion made a lower QUALITY signal. Incidentally, some stations came in fine and some were ruined by this stronger distorted signal. Raw signal strength itself is not a predictor of performance.
I received this information from an electronic engineer
who has worked on satellite communictions.
Ask him about what I wrote, too.
I am going to attempt to adjust the dish to obtain greater
signal strength and will report back on the results.
You should do that just on general principles. A signal "level" of 71 is barely good in low humidity conditions, and pretty much guarantees signal loss in rainy conditions. Pay attention to the tilt of the dish, too, as the LNBs must line up with, essentially, the ecliptic. That means that in California, dishes are set some 12 degrees counter-clockwise of straight up, but as you move to the east, the dishes will be set more and more clockwise from that position. (I did not give total numbers of degrees as the old dishes call upright ninety but I think the new dishes call upright zero.)