Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
HDTV Reception Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Winegard Square Shooter SS-2000
This thread has 18 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Friday January 7, 2005 at 10:07
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
Just recently I replaced a RCA powered table top antenna with a Winegard Square Shooter SS-2000 in my attic. With the RCA I was able to pull in all the stations that I expected including ones that were located 45 degrees or so from all the others. It was okay viewing with the RCA but PBS, UPN, and WB were weak signals and would drop out occasionly.

With the Winegard I was unable to even get a signal with 3 of the HD stations mentioned above and the PBS station which is 45 out from the other stations would barely lock on no matter how I oriented the Winegard.

I realise the Winegard is directional. Does this mean line of site directional ??

I thought maybe the external amp that comes with the 2000 was defective so I removed it and found that the signal got much worse so I assume it is doing something.

I am going to try a couple of more things before returning this antenna. I will replace the short coax cable between the antenna and the amp in hopes it was defective. And I will remove the plastic cover over the antenna in hopes that the plastic is occulting the signal but I don't have high hopes.

I can't see keeping a $100.00 antenna when a $25.00 RCA does better.

P.S. Please don't suggest I mount the antenna outside as the better half will not comply.

-Don B
Post 2 made on Friday January 7, 2005 at 19:19
SkyBird
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2003
349
pitch the amplifier that came with the Square shooter and use a Channel Master 7777.

Install the preamp in line in the attic. Install the amp behind the TV.
OP | Post 3 made on Monday January 10, 2005 at 14:16
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
SkyBird,

Thanks for the suggestion.

I had reservations about the included amp which looks kind of small.


Not sure if I will have time to implement your idea before I return this antenna.

I took the plastic cover off the face of the 2000 and it improved the reception to about the same as my tv top amplified RCA antennae.

But it would be nice to try the Channel Master 7777- I wish I knew where they sold them locally in the Raleigh,NC area.

-Don B
Post 4 made on Monday January 10, 2005 at 21:07
SkyBird
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2003
349
Any TV service or Antenna store would have them
OP | Post 5 made on Tuesday January 11, 2005 at 16:47
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
Lessons Learned:

The attic area that I have the antennas mounted in is on the side of the house where the peak comes together and luckily points in the direction of most of the digital transmitters.

A triangular shaped vent of about 4 ft on a side is located in this area. The screen covering the vent is made of plastic or fibreglass but at least is not a metal material.

I tried moving my RCA powered TV top antenna higher to the peak of the triangle thinking that height would gain me better reception. This did not help at all in fact I lost most of the signal.

It than dawned on me that by raising the antenna higher I was actually occulting the signal as the area of the vent "triangle" got smaller.

Once I realised what was happening I remounted the Square SHooter lower and now I can receive ABC,CBS,NBC,Fox and PBS all at the same time without messing with the antenna. I still can't pull in UPN and WB but I think I only received them with the Samsung SIR 351 which I returned and not the T100 which I still own.

I still plan on getting a Channel Master 7777 as mentioned above and am guessing it may just help with WB and UPN.

-Don B
Post 6 made on Saturday January 15, 2005 at 20:15
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
There is EVERY likelihood that the outside finish of your house's wall has wire mesh in it....

Most of these antennas are highly directional in killing signals that they are 90 degrees from, but it is reasonable to expect them to pick up stations 45 degrees off axis.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
OP | Post 7 made on Monday February 21, 2005 at 10:31
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
Square Shooter 2000 lesson learned.
I had been wondering what the real difference between the non amplified 1000 and the amplified 2000 was short of the included amp that comes with the 2000.

Well I learned last night that what I thought was just a small included Winegard amp was actually just the power supply for the 2000. The (Amp/pre-amp) I am guessing is some how built into the internal workings of the 2000. This is not obvious when you look at the antenna and is not obvious from the small included manual.

In the manual it even goes as far as to say:
Note: A diplexer that is power passive on both sides may be used instead of the power supply. If using a diplexer, connect coax to diplexer secured on back of antenna with velcro(supplied).

Does anyone no what the above "Note:" means ? I am left wondering where the power to power the built in preamp comes from ??

I also wonder if I replace the external power supply with a Channel Master 7777 as mentioned above what will happen ? Will the internal preamp mess up the signal as it is not being powerd or will it just drop to a passive pass through state.

I may just write Winegard and ask them this question if no one else know the answer.

-Don B
Post 8 made on Monday February 21, 2005 at 18:13
Daniel Tonks
Wrangler of Remotes
Joined:
Posts:
October 1998
28,781
That's called a "preamp", where the power supply and actual amplifier are separated.

I'm not exactly sure what they're saying about the diplexer line - but suspect that if your diplexer is "power passive" (or passes power) on *both* DSS and antenna outputs, then enough of the power inserted by the satellite receiver to power the dish's LNBs will be passed to the antenna to power its amp. Otherwise, if the diplexer only passes power on one side (to the dish) then you'll still need to put the antenna's power supply between the diplexer and antenna.
OP | Post 9 made on Tuesday February 22, 2005 at 10:23
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
Daniel,

Interesting, I bet that is what Winegard is talking about. Do you think I would have a problem removing the "power supply" and replacing it with a 7777 Channel Master to get higher DB gain and sensitivity?

I am concerned that the Preamp may not be happy.

For now I am going to keep using the Square Shooter as is since I have other related antenna reception problems to resolve like diplexing both my antennas.

-Don B
OP | Post 10 made on Thursday February 24, 2005 at 15:52
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
I finally wrote Winegard and they told me I have to use the included power supply of course that does not mean I can't use a 7777 after the power supply.

My Question:
Can I replace the power supply that comes with the Square Shooter 2000 with a more sensitive higher db ampifier or will the Square Shooters internal preamp cause problems ?


Winegards answer:
The power supply is just that and has to be used. It is not an amplifier. The amplifier is inside the antenna head which is powered by the power supply. An amplifier does not allow the elements to collect more signal. It takes what signal you have and amplifies it so it overcomes the losses that are present in the transmission line between the amplifier and the TV set. To get more signal you can either raise the antenna or use a larger one. If you are operating several TV sets and have long coax runs then you can use a distrbution amp. The amount of loss can be calculated by a professional installer. The SS-2000 has a gain of approx. 15 db. 100 feet of RG-59 will have apprx 6db of loss and each connector will have about 1 db loss while a good quality splitter will have aroud 3 db loss. The ideal situation is that the preamp will be robust enough to give you unity gain at the tv set. Any thing from 0 to -10 is adequate. Unity gain means that for a 15 db amp you will have 15 db of loss to the TV set.
Post 11 made on Saturday February 26, 2005 at 07:29
bookaroni
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2004
458
On 02/24/05 15:52 ET, barlow said...
I finally wrote Winegard and they told me I have
to use the included power supply of course that
does not mean I can't use a 7777 after the power
supply.

My Question:
Can I replace the power supply that comes with
the Square Shooter 2000 with a more sensitive
higher db ampifier or will the Square Shooters
internal preamp cause problems ?

Winegards answer:
The power supply is just that and has to be used.
It is not an amplifier. The amplifier is inside
the antenna head which is powered by the power
supply. An amplifier does not allow the elements
to collect more signal. It takes what signal you
have and amplifies it so it overcomes the losses
that are present in the transmission line between
the amplifier and the TV set. To get more signal
you can either raise the antenna or use a larger
one. If you are operating several TV sets and
have long coax runs then you can use a distrbution
amp. The amount of loss can be calculated by a
professional installer. The SS-2000 has a gain
of approx. 15 db. 100 feet of RG-59 will have
apprx 6db of loss and each connector will have
about 1 db loss while a good quality splitter
will have aroud 3 db loss. The ideal situation
is that the preamp will be robust enough to give
you unity gain at the tv set. Any thing from 0
to -10 is adequate. Unity gain means that for
a 15 db amp you will have 15 db of loss to the
TV set.

Very interesting. I have the Square Shooter SS-2000 installed on my roof. And the power supply is in a box in the basement. I get every channel antenna.org said I would. Why is that.
Post 12 made on Saturday February 26, 2005 at 10:35
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
7,462
Guys, it works like this.

An amplifier will NOT increase the signal the antenna receives, it will only increase that which the antenna has already received. That's what Winegard is saying.

Simple matter with antenna's. You want more signal? Get a LARGER antenna that has more area or move your antenna to a higher location (the right way).

With antenna's elevation is what it's all about. Higher elevation, higher signal level.

And by the way. Inside the attic causes approximately 45% signal LOSS, so if you want a signal increase, move the antenna to the outside.
OP | Post 13 made on Monday February 28, 2005 at 09:47
barlow
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
535
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme,

What I was trying to find out from Winegard was "Will the internal preamp
cause problems if I instead use a Channel Master 7777 as suggested
above" as opposed to not using the Winegard including power supply which would than leave the built in preamp unpowered.

Or as bookaroni pointed out will the preamp if unpowered occult
the signal in any way.

It looks like leaving the Preamp unpowered is okay and it will just act
as a pass through when unpowered. I was afraid it would also introduce a
"db loss" when unpowered.

As one installer on this forum suggested for helping find a good
signal.The key is putting your HD tuner and display on the roof or in the
attic with you. In this condition I am sure I would see I don't need a
booster.

But the reality is I have the tuner in the room with the monitor and have
loss thru cable runs which require boost to compensate. I am sure I
could get a much larger antenna and POff the better half as well as the
home owners association by putting it on the roof. But I don't have that
option. So I am limited to what I can fit in the attic near the vents.

-Don B
Post 14 made on Monday February 28, 2005 at 19:45
sel2884
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2004
5
On 02/28/05 09:47 ET, barlow said...
Trunk-Slammer -Supreme,

What I was trying to find out from Winegard was
"Will the internal preamp
cause problems if I instead use a Channel Master
7777 as suggested
above" as opposed to not using the Winegard including
power supply which would than leave the built
in preamp unpowered.

Or as bookaroni pointed out will the preamp if
unpowered occult
the signal in any way.

It looks like leaving the Preamp unpowered is
okay and it will just act
as a pass through when unpowered. I was afraid
it would also introduce a
"db loss" when unpowered.

As one installer on this forum suggested for helping
find a good
signal.The key is putting your HD tuner and display
on the roof or in the
attic with you. In this condition I am sure
I would see I don't need a
booster.

But the reality is I have the tuner in the room
with the monitor and have
loss thru cable runs which require boost to compensate.
I am sure I
could get a much larger antenna and POff the better
half as well as the
home owners association by putting it on the roof.
But I don't have that
option. So I am limited to what I can fit in the
attic near the vents.

-Don B

Check out the winegard sensar III gs-2200, I installed one today and was the best antenna I have ever seen. My local stations average 48 miles from me and for the first time all channels came in hi def. I looks pretty cool on the roof too.
Post 15 made on Tuesday June 7, 2005 at 23:13
sbxxxvipats
Lurking Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2005
1
I'm curious, I just looked up the sensar III on winegards website, Is this supposed to be that much better than the SS2000. It looks to be comparble. I just put up a SS2000 in the winter and could get some HDTV but now that the trees have bloomed I've lost 3 stations. I'm wondering if this would be the fix for it? I'm also looking for opinions here. I live 30+ miles from the HD signal but unfortunatly I live in a bowl so catching the signal isn't the easiest thing. Especially since Denver sucks for broadcasting it. Anyways just looking for an opinion if someone thinks this would be better than the SS2000?
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse