Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
URC's Consumer Remotes Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
cool trick for rf issues on mx3000
This thread has 8 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Friday May 19, 2006 at 21:27
dlux
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2006
14
i had an area with immense rf interference and i couldn't get my customer's mx3k to work consistently from the patio out back. so i coiled an extra ir flasher with the tips cut off around the mrf 300 reciever and closed the antenna. the coil makes for a nice "shield", so your rf is kickin ass with no interference!

try it on the mrf250 also!
Post 2 made on Monday May 22, 2006 at 01:41
Control Remotes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
3,434
That's a very good tip! Can you post a picture of it, so everyone can get a clear understanding of what you're doing? :)



Thank you,
Damon DG
= = = = =
http://www.ProRemotes.com - Authorized Dealer & Remote Programming Services
Remote Programming Services for URC Remotes
http://www.PremierAVDesigns.com - 914-509-5360
Follow me on Twitter @HomeTheaterNY
Post 3 made on Monday May 22, 2006 at 17:46
ckemp29
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2006
407
If you have a picture please send it to my e-mail. I am currently having major rf issues and cant seem to get a hold of it. Thanks
Chad Kemp
A/V Connections
Post 4 made on Tuesday May 23, 2006 at 08:51
dinom
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
643
I'm guessing the closing of the antenna did the trick. Wrapping the emitter around the MRF-300 sounds like black magic to me.

Dino
Post 5 made on Tuesday May 23, 2006 at 11:45
Tom Ciaramitaro
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2002
7,968
On May 23, 2006 at 08:51, dinom said...
I'm guessing the closing of the antenna did the
trick. Wrapping the emitter around the MRF-300
sounds like black magic to me.

Dino

Unless it is grounded - then it can act as an RF ground.
There is no truth anymore. Only assertions. The internet world has no interest in truth, only vindication for preconceived assumptions.
Post 6 made on Tuesday May 23, 2006 at 11:51
dinom
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
643
I doubt wrapping an emitter wire (grounded or not) around an MRF-300 would provide enough coverage around the unit to shield from EMI. I'm just speaking from experience as an EE.

Dino
Post 7 made on Thursday May 25, 2006 at 19:36
SOUND.SD
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2006
5,523
Isnt the point of the 300 that you can move the 150 to a interference free location.

As for the 250.. I have had great sucsess just removing the antenna.

Who knows maybe itll come in handy one day.

I have heard that tin foil works too, but I have never been this desperate.
Bulldog AV - San Diego, CA
www.bulldog-av.com
[Link: facebook.com]
Post 8 made on Thursday May 25, 2006 at 22:09
rosariorose9
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2006
122
On May 25, 2006 at 19:36, SOUND.SD said...
.....I have heard that tin foil works too, but I have
never been this desperate.

I guess that explains the hat.. ;-)

rosariorose9
But I digress......
Post 9 made on Friday May 26, 2006 at 10:18
ljckbailey
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2003
285
Tin foil has little effect at blocking RF unless you ground it somehow and then it is typically still poor. Grounded shields are probably the best alternative but still usually yield less than adequate results. There is a specific metal, Mu (pronounced Mee-ooo, with less emphasis on the ee than the ooo) metal that has good RF shielding characteristics. In fact, it is what is used to shield magnetic field RF in speakers that are intended to for placement next to TV monitors in professional applications and around sensitive tuner components in broadcast tuner/mod/de-mod applications. It's expensive, a little hard to find and of course preforms better at some frequencies than others but if you can find some you might give a try. Of course blocking all RF from a MRF would be counter productive so in this case encasing the offending component (if it is a component) would be the way to go.

I just read this and now doubt it's helpfulness, but maybe someone may find the info useful at some point. My apologies to the rest .


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse