On 09/01/05 10:15 ET, javabean said...
A little note on the last bytes of the code: 35
91 35 97
it's in every learned code I have (for this humax)
and something very simlar is even in the codes
generated by Makehex, so I don't think it's a
"garbled version of the NEC1 repeating frame".
Anyway I don't have any idea of what it is.
It definitely represents the NEC1 repeating frame. It looks to me like an incorrect representation of that. But I'm not certain it is incorrect. (I am certain of what it represents).
The "something very similar" may be a correct representation of the NEC1 repeating frame.