| Post 1 made on Thursday February 19, 2004 at 19:51 |
Barry Gordon Founding Member |
Joined:
Posts: | August 2001
2,157 |
|
|
I started my ipronto conversion by opening my pronto Pro ccf. It looked good, but I just noticed that the last field (the last off timing burst) of every learned IR entry from the ccf has a value of zero. Now logically this should not matter other than it would theoretically allow two patterns in a macro to be too close together. Has any body had any experience with this. I can hand correct it, but will it matter?
|
|
| Post 2 made on Friday February 20, 2004 at 01:45 |
Daniel Tonks Wrangler of Remotes |
Joined:
Posts: | October 1998
28,780 |
|
|
I think this was done as the "minimum" delay between IR commands is already quite long, unlike models based on the original Pronto.
|
|
| OP | Post 3 made on Friday February 20, 2004 at 16:56 |
Barry Gordon Founding Member |
Joined:
Posts: | August 2001
2,157 |
|
|
What about on a repeat sequence where you are trying to scan a VCR or DVD by holding down the button? any one seen any problems. If the minimum is long as you say Daniel, then it might not scan properly.
|
|
| Post 4 made on Friday February 20, 2004 at 17:35 |
Daniel Tonks Wrangler of Remotes |
Joined:
Posts: | October 1998
28,780 |
|
|
For some reason it doesn't seem to affect that. Quite often this problem crops up with the Pronto NG, and disregarding people noticing the problem, nothing seems to happen...
|
|
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our
Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product
click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
