|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
Topic: | Thread Views This thread has 39 replies. Displaying posts 16 through 30. |
|
Post 16 made on Tuesday January 8, 2008 at 16:00 |
Damik Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2005 6,203 |
|
|
On January 8, 2008 at 11:06, djy said...
Not sure if anyone else has noticed, but if one clicks on a page not viewed for a little while (i.e. one that is red and not black), the page view count increments by two and not one. Interesting...I tried 10, and 9 gave me a double count and one (the first one I tried and the newest) gave me a single count!
|
I knew this was a mistake; my grip on reality's not too good at the best of times. Glitz, in "The Ultimate Foe" |
|
Post 17 made on Tuesday January 8, 2008 at 18:43 |
Anthony Ultimate Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2001 28,870 |
|
|
tried a few and they all gave me single counts, even tried on the second page
|
... |
|
Post 18 made on Wednesday January 9, 2008 at 02:22 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 34,758 |
|
|
On January 8, 2008 at 18:43, Anthony said...
tried a few and they all gave me single counts, even tried on the second page Strange indeed.
|
|
Post 19 made on Wednesday January 9, 2008 at 02:46 |
Daniel Tonks Wrangler of Remotes |
Joined: Posts: | October 1998 28,780 |
|
|
That could be Google MediaBot updating its cache of the page.
|
|
Post 20 made on Thursday July 31, 2008 at 19:53 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 34,758 |
|
|
Oops! Didn't look far enough.
|
|
Post 21 made on Thursday July 31, 2008 at 20:28 |
The Robman Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 6,218 |
|
|
|
OP | Post 22 made on Friday January 30, 2009 at 00:50 |
edmund Elite Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2002 13,839 |
|
|
1-30-2009
TWAT- 580,120 views Insignia- 693,259 views
|
|
Post 23 made on Friday January 30, 2009 at 03:48 |
Daniel Tonks Wrangler of Remotes |
Joined: Posts: | October 1998 28,780 |
|
|
So TWAT has gone up 8.72%, Insignia has gone up 11.16%. I think Insignia is going to continue to win.
|
|
Post 24 made on Friday January 30, 2009 at 06:44 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 34,758 |
|
|
On January 30, 2009 at 03:48, Daniel Tonks said...
So TWAT has gone up 8.72%, Insignia has gone up 11.16%. I think Insignia is going to continue to win. As you are aware, given the counting anomaly I found, I am a little sceptical of the thread view figure totals. However, that said, I think the percentage difference between TWAT and Insignia might be worse than that indicated. I've done a little more research on the counting anomaly and I believe I've found that it only affects those members who've previously posted in (whatever) forum thread. For example, if edmund (last posted in Insignia 11 months ago) were to refrain from visiting the Insignia thread for a month or two, then return, the resulting visit would initially generate two views per page; i.e. go through the 13 pages and the result would be 26 views rather than 13 (n.b. subsequent visits would only generate one view). A new (non posting) visitor, on the other hand, would only ever generate one view per page. Now in contrast to the above, I have to own up to the fact that in recent weeks I've once again gone through the whole of TWAT - so straight away that's 2000+ views above the norm. If we then double that total, which I'm fairly confident would have been the case, I believe that that alone can account for the best part of 1% of that 8.72%; i.e. I think a figure of 7.8-9% increase would be a little closer to the truth (though what truth is open to question). In conclusion, given what I've now found, I believe the Insignia viewing figures are likely to be fairly accurate (most visitors to the thread being new and just looking for codes) whereas with TWAT, who knows? One thing for certain, however, is that TWAT is the most subscribed thread, in both posts and posters. For that, three cheers to JP!
Last edited by djy
on January 30, 2009 07:15.
|
|
Post 25 made on Saturday January 31, 2009 at 01:15 |
39 Cent Stamp Elite Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2007 17,518 |
|
|
|
Post 26 made on Saturday January 31, 2009 at 17:25 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 34,758 |
|
|
Lots of threads to view here . . .
|
|
Post 27 made on Sunday August 22, 2010 at 12:33 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 34,758 |
|
|
On January 30, 2009 at 03:48, Daniel Tonks said...
So TWAT has gone up 8.72%, Insignia has gone up 11.16%. I think Insignia is going to continue to win. Just browsing the forums and noticed a somewhat remarkable reversal of fortunes . . . As of the moment the Insignia thread views = 816,357, and the T.W.A.T. thread views = 989,517. Seems like T.W.A.T. is going to crack the 1,000,000 barrier first after all. Anyone want to hazard a guess as to when? My guess; 5 th September.
Last edited by djy on August 22, 2010 12:42.
|
|
Post 28 made on Wednesday August 25, 2010 at 02:35 |
Damik Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2005 6,203 |
|
|
djy, as keeper of those wonderful stats I guess you would have a better idea than most.
September 3
|
I knew this was a mistake; my grip on reality's not too good at the best of times. Glitz, in "The Ultimate Foe" |
|
Post 29 made on Wednesday August 25, 2010 at 08:02 |
Daniel Tonks Wrangler of Remotes |
Joined: Posts: | October 1998 28,780 |
|
|
I'm afraid you both lose, because another thread has snuck up the rear and already surpassed 1,000,000 views!
|
|
Post 30 made on Wednesday August 25, 2010 at 10:32 |
djy RC Moderator |
Joined: Posts: | August 2001 34,758 |
|
|
|
|
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|