Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Convert Stereo to mono?
This thread has 19 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Saturday June 10, 2006 at 22:49
hitagain
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
146
Went to look at a job today, Customer have small patio-deck area with "3 zones" of control for music volume (used to maintain backround music for partys) right now there is one amp feeding 3 xantech Rat1's (1 zone large deck, 1 zone patio, 1 zone small deck) each "zone" has 2 speakers. The problem is the "sweet spot" For each zone is small and sounds like S%$T. Was thinking of changing each zone to mono to balance the sound and need to do it after the Rat1's. Any ideas?
Post 2 made on Saturday June 10, 2006 at 23:06
Shoe
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2001
1,385
I would think some testing would be advised. You should be able to check out each zone to at least get an idea of the difference in sound between stereo and mono. There could be other factors in play. It may be underpowered, or it may benefit from equalization etc.. There is a general trend here to go to mono outdoors but sometimes stereo sounds great in this type of application.
Post 3 made on Saturday June 10, 2006 at 23:22
2nd rick
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2002
4,521
The general reason to go to mono outdoors is the weird effects of spotty channel coverage when you are only in the range of one channel, or if one channel is definitely prominent...

Try this, tune your car stereo to classic rock radio and then pan to one side and listen to it for an hour or so... it will drive you insane.
Rick Murphy
Troy, MI
Post 4 made on Saturday June 10, 2006 at 23:51
pilgram
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2004
5,684
'Mono' is not a bad word when it comes to Whole house distribution!

If you have a dedicated listening spot, stereo sounds better.

Why do you need to convert to mono 'after' the RAT-1's?

It's a lot easier to do it at the source input(Y-adapters) to the amp.

Converting 'speaker level' to mono is more money consuming(if anyone still makes one!).
Every day is a good day.......some are just better than others!

Proud to say that my property is protected by a high speed wireless device!
Post 5 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 00:19
SammPX
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2005
471
On June 10, 2006 at 23:51, pilgram said...
It's a lot easier to do it at the source input(Y-adapters)
to the amp.

Correct me if I am wrong, but this kills the stereo seperation and sounds really bad!

I have used an RDL summing amp in the past for a bunch of speakers in a line down the side of a pool or tennis court or for rock speakers along a path. It sounds much better than stereo.

TXMX2R - [Link: rdlnet.com]
Post 6 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 00:41
CCD
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
2,731
It sounds like you have a phase problem or some real shite speakers. Remember speakers can be out of phase even if they are wired correctly. My guess is that they are actually wired out of phase. Mono will not fix this. Shoe had it, you need to test test test! If that doesn't work try som SM Paradigm speakers. You will need to run more wire and make sure the amp will deal with a 4ohm load. That will give you stereo at each speaker thus avoiding the problem Rick brought up.
Post 7 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 01:02
2nd rick
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2002
4,521
I knew a guy who quoted single stereo all around for areas like that so that there was "stereo" sound everywhere...

I always thought that was a poor design because you are using twice as many amplifier channels, still getting the same area of coverage, and the stereo seperation will really not be any better than mono because the left and right portions of the speakers are not actually seperated!!.

I think that single stereo spoeakers are best used when only a single speaker is called for.
Rick Murphy
Troy, MI
Post 8 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 01:16
teknobeam1
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
626
If you can go stereo in a distributed situation like a pub or a restuarant, i always say do it. Keep in mind, relfections in the room exist from both the left and right speakers and yes, it sounds better. The fear of hearing an instrument from one speaker and not the other one it's paired with sounds warranted on paper, but it's negligible in the big picture. The sense of separation and better fidelity and a more spacial ambience is worth the trade off ( if there even is one). mono saves money and labor, and without comparing the two side by side, many people wouldn't balk at the mono suystem as long as it was designed properly ( same goes for the stereo system)
Post 9 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 01:47
pilgram
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2004
5,684
On June 11, 2006 at 00:19, SammPX said...
Correct me if I am wrong, but this kills the stereo
seperation and sounds really bad!

You only have 'stereo seperation' if your running 'stereo' and happen to be sitting in the 'sweet spot' between two speakers.

Running mono does sound bad compared to sitting at the base of an equilateral triangle listening to stereo!

Whole house music(and bar music for the most part) will never be ideal for critical listening!

It is nice being able to hear the WHOLE song(both channels) at a given location when you are only in range of 1 speaker!
Every day is a good day.......some are just better than others!

Proud to say that my property is protected by a high speed wireless device!
Post 10 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 02:04
Mr. Stanley
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2006
16,954
Replace all the speakers with single stereo speakers (provided you can add the wiring).
How many people when having an outdoor party are going to get Anal about the stereo sweetspots anyway?
All they are usually concerned about is the speakers not sounding too tinny, or if the volume levels are evenly disbursed without annoying hot-spots if anything.
"If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger."
Frank Lloyd Wright
Post 11 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 02:05
pilgram
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2004
5,684
On June 11, 2006 at 00:19, SammPX said...
Correct me if I am wrong,

I'm not saying your 'wrong' by any means!

I jsut do what works for the client.
Every day is a good day.......some are just better than others!

Proud to say that my property is protected by a high speed wireless device!
Post 12 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 02:51
MikeTech
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2004
313
Instead of changing the speakers to "single stereo speakers" i would change the amp to something like the Sonance 1250 where you can set the amp to mono where needed. You'll still be able to keep seperate zones and its better than y connectors IMO.

Mike
Post 13 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 10:09
Dawn Gordon Luks
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2001
1,178
Fred from Capitol Sales turned me onto the Audioplex Mono-Mixer. It's great for outdoor and bathroom use where mono is preferable to stereo. I use it to take two channels into one speaker.

[Link: audioplex.com]

Dawn
Post 14 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 10:44
Vincent Delpino
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
1,818
As stated before, Mono is not a bad thing. Stereo is often over used. Kitchens and bathrooms often sound better with a summed output as when you walk around the space you don't lose information. Try listening to SPACE ODDITY by David Bowie. There are actually 2 versions of this song. It was originally released in mono. It was re-released in stereo. If you are not seated in a position to hear both channels you will only hear ground control or major Tom. Now in a kitchen where people are walking around it makes little sense to run stereo unless you know there is a primary listening area. This is very true for outdoor music as well. Especially if the speakers are far apart or along a pathway. That being said, If you are using volume controls I would not use the audioplex speaker level mixer, as it is an autoformer. You are much better off summing the line level signal.
[Link: audioplex.com]
Much better then a Y connector.
OP | Post 15 made on Sunday June 11, 2006 at 11:55
hitagain
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2005
146
Need to go alittle more indepth. This system was installed about a few months ago by another company The system strickly feeds the patio-deck area. They have a five disk cd player feed a reciever/amp unit that has no option to bridge output. So I have to work with speaker level outputs, the rat1 is a volume control auto transfomer and I dont know If it would aloow me to do mono before it, so thats why I was looking to go after it. The speakers for the small deck and patio are in a landscaped area and some of the plantings block the sound so in spots you only hear one channel.
When they use it for patrys most the time it is for soft rock/easy music and it sounds alright buy when they use it for day to day for Fm radio it sounds bad. Was looking for an easy fix for them. Speaker replacement and wiring could be and option but also looking to give them lower price range option also.
We are in the proceess of designing a theather (25K+) for them at this time and looking to do alittle kissing up to get the install.
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse