|
|
|
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:
Topic: | CCTV Question This thread has 14 replies. Displaying all posts. |
|
Post 1 made on Wednesday April 12, 2006 at 22:46 |
Instalz Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2005 628 |
|
|
Hi guys. A customer wants a camera put in the birthing room of his horse stables so that he can monitor a horse that is soon to deliver. The stable is about 450' from the house. There may be a vacant 2" conduit from house to stable. Will check that out on friday. I am installing a wireless router in the stable office on Friday for internet, (modem is located in the stable office) and he already has internet service in the house (modem in the house). What are your thoughts on using a wireless network camera vs. hardwiring? He has an apple laptop at the house so was thinking about wireless. Any thoughts on a camera, and the setup? Thanks...
|
|
Post 2 made on Wednesday April 12, 2006 at 23:09 |
AHEM Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2004 1,837 |
|
|
450' feet is a fairly long run for composite video, but it can be done.
In most cases, I'd advocate doing a conventional hardwired system, but this could be one example where wireless IP might make sense.
|
|
Post 3 made on Wednesday April 12, 2006 at 23:14 |
Louis Twist Long Time Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2006 79 |
|
|
we use NVT stuff when we have to go long distance www.nvt.comhope this helps
|
|
OP | Post 4 made on Wednesday April 12, 2006 at 23:15 |
Instalz Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2005 628 |
|
|
Thanks AHEM. If there is no conduit from stable to house, wireless will be the only way so far as budget. Any other thoughts? I haven't done any IP cameras yet.
|
|
Post 5 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 01:22 |
AHEM Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2004 1,837 |
|
|
The concern about wireless over IP is going to be bandwidth. The higher the resolution, and the more FPS will result in progressively larger packet sizes, which could very well prove to be a log jam in their network, and other network traffic will progressively add latency to the video transfer.
This is an area where the conventional, analog, composite video signal will outperform IP cameras. I'd ask the customer what his/her expectations are as far as video quality and capture rate. If he/she's looking for full motion, live video then IP (wireless or wired) is going to be a dissapointing option.
|
|
Post 6 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 07:44 |
djnorm Founding Member |
Joined: Posts: | January 2002 1,693 |
|
|
Look into the Panasonic IP cameras ( I think Fred knows about them...) They would be perfect for this application, since they have internet in both locations. The bigger one has remote pan/zoom - really cool.
Good luck.
|
|
Post 7 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 08:08 |
juliejacobson CE Pro Magazine |
Joined: Posts: | April 2003 3,032 |
|
|
most of the decent security distributors have cctv specialists you can ask. There are several long-distance wireless IR cameras (up to 2 miles) if you have line of sight. I forget the company names but the distributors should know.
|
"CEPro: your website sucks!" - Fins www.cepro.com[Link: twitter.com] |
|
Post 8 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 09:47 |
Fred Harding Super Member |
Joined: Posts: | October 2001 3,460 |
|
|
The answer is,
what does your customer want to do? If they are interested in being able to monitor Silver from a remote location, ip makes total sense. If they want to pan and tilt and zoom, ip makes total sense. Panasonic came up with a device to plug into their ip camera system that also allows composite output with remote control, so you could establish preset zoom/camera angles and easily access accordingly.
if the guy is a cheap skate, you certainly could use moderate priced video baluns and send a signal down cat 5 from stable to house and simply monitor the picture.
I'd push for fancy, because he's got the dough.
|
On the West Coast of Wisconsin |
|
Post 9 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 10:00 |
idodishez Select Member |
Joined: Posts: | May 2003 2,433 |
|
|
IIRC from some Homelogic training, Panasonic makes a pretty inexpensive ip cam with Pan and tilt, just no zoom. Under $200, model 110 sumn sumn (lots of help huh?):)
|
No, I wont install your plasma with an orange extension cord hanging down the wall. www.customdigitalinc.com |
|
OP | Post 10 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 15:44 |
Instalz Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2005 628 |
|
|
Thanks all. What I am thinking is to hardwire to the router in the stable that has it's own modem, and then he can view it from his house which has it's own modem and router. Does this make sense? Pan, tilt, zoom isn't important. One camera placed high in the stable should cover it. The stable that the horse is in for birthing is only about 12'X12'. Do you think I could get a quality pic using this approach? Thanks guys/gals
|
|
OP | Post 11 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 21:05 |
Instalz Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2005 628 |
|
|
Fred, I'm looking at the panny BL-c10A or the KX-HCM110A. This barn/stable is not heated during the winter. Will the camera hold up to the freezing temps? Is there a housing I can buy for it? If anyone has any input on either of these cams let me know as I'm trying to put this together for the A.M. Thanks
|
|
OP | Post 12 made on Thursday April 13, 2006 at 21:26 |
Instalz Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2005 628 |
|
|
I looked at another job today. A furniture store. They want 4 cameras, with network capability, and a DVR recorder. Suggestions? It must be my week for cameras..
|
|
Post 13 made on Friday April 14, 2006 at 07:59 |
Wire Nuts Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | June 2005 611 |
|
|
On April 13, 2006 at 21:26, Instalz said...
I looked at another job today. A furniture store. They want 4 cameras, with network capability, and a DVR recorder. Suggestions? It must be my week for cameras.. I have used the greyfox system in a commercial enviroment with great success. The IP server piece works very well and you just tie it into any computer, set up your addresses and go. Can see the cameras remotely, just can't pan/tilt/zoom. The cameras are set up for cold weather applications. All you need to run is a single cat5 to each camera.
|
|
Post 14 made on Friday April 14, 2006 at 09:42 |
ceied Loyal Member |
Joined: Posts: | February 2002 5,753 |
|
|
please remember that video over ip is awfull at best and unexceptable at worse.... video over ip even the best pelco , honeywell or toshiba is choppy and kinda pixalated. then your upstream from the stable will be bad as well.
the video server will eat up a ton of the available upsrtream bandwidth. most cable modems have a max of 380 megs upstream even though they have like 2 gigs on download.
best image quality will be standard analog camera with ballum.
hope that helps
ed
|
Ed will be known as the Tiger Woods of the integration business, followed closely with the renaming of his company to "Hotties A/V". The tag line will be "We like big racks and tight holes"... |
|
OP | Post 15 made on Friday April 14, 2006 at 21:56 |
Instalz Active Member |
Joined: Posts: | April 2005 628 |
|
|
Thanks guys. The pic quality is that bad?
|
|
|
Before you can reply to a message... |
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now. |
Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.
|
|