Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Tired of fiberglass for speaker batting
This thread has 25 replies. Displaying posts 1 through 15.
Post 1 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 01:04
netarc
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
1,348
Was installing some more ceiling speakers recently - going thru the typical rigamarole of "suiting up" (gloves, respirator, goggles, going outside to do all the cutting) to handle the speaker cavity fill - when I realized how much I hate dealing with R-13 insulation!

Any suggestions for an alternate (and less toxic!) material for use as ceiling/inwall speaker backfill? Was thinking of something similar to this polyfill at P/E, but hopefully cheaper!
Post 2 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 01:38
pilgram
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2004
5,684
Go to Wallmart and get some pillow stuffing(polyfill).
I HATE Wallmart but it is about $3 a bag.
Every day is a good day.......some are just better than others!

Proud to say that my property is protected by a high speed wireless device!
OP | Post 3 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 12:55
netarc
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
1,348
Yah, I'd heard the recommendation re: pillow stuffing before - my concern with that was potential code issues ... e.g., isn't that stuff flammable, and potentially not "code" for construction use?
Post 4 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 13:08
cma
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
3,044
Try this, may be a little harder to come by and a little more expensive though... but it is a true insulating product that meets all codes and fire ratings.

[Link: environmentalhomecenter.com]
Post 5 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 13:09
Ted Wetzel
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
879
There is cotton insulation out there. I believe the brand name is ultra touch. Next time I'm in NY I was planning on picking up a few bags for exactly the same reason you posted. This stuff has very good sound absorption as well.
how many times have I been working in a basement with miles of exposed fiberglass insulation and young children playing? This stuff would be a nice alternative and for our application it meets codes.

The other option is Triad speakers that have the aluminum back box.

http://www.bondedlogic.com/
Post 6 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 13:24
Theaterworks
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
1,898
I really doubt pillow stuffing or cotton meets building code. I've used pillow stuffing inside cabinets, but never in walls.
Carpe diem!
Post 7 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 13:35
Ted Wetzel
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
879
On April 10, 2006 at 13:24, Theaterworks said...
I really doubt pillow stuffing or cotton meets
building code. I've used pillow stuffing inside
cabinets, but never in walls.

If you're referring to my post - it certainly does meet code and is a realistic alternative to fiberglass for consumers interested in more renewable building practices.
Post 8 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 14:08
FRR
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2003
918
If you're looking for formaldehyde-free fibreglass insulation check out this company. One of my contractors will ONLY work with thiis stuff now.

[Link: jm.com]

Keep in mind that you should be using dust masks for all types of insulation. I don't work in insulated attics unless I have a mask.

Cheer
Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
OP | Post 9 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 14:12
netarc
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
1,348
On April 10, 2006 at 13:08, cma said...
Try this, may be a little harder to come by and
a little more expensive though... but it is a
true insulating product that meets all codes and
fire ratings.

[Link: environmentalhomecenter.com]

Now this (and the Bonded Logic product) is truly interesting, thansk for sharing this! It's not *that* much more expensive - a quick comparison shows that R-13 from HD/Loews runs ~.33/sq ft, while the UltraTouch cotton stuff is .56/sq ft ... ok, so it's nearly twice as expensive, but if it's safe & nontoxic, that's well worth it, imo!
OP | Post 10 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 14:19
netarc
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2004
1,348
On April 10, 2006 at 14:08, FRR said...
If you're looking for formaldehyde-free fibreglass
insulation check out this company. One of my contractors
will ONLY work with thiis stuff now.

[Link: jm.com]

Keep in mind that you should be using dust masks
for all types of insulation. I don't work in insulated
attics unless I have a mask.

I thought it wasn't so much the formaldehyde in the product, as the fiberglass itself, that was harmful/toxic?
Post 11 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 16:31
FRR
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2003
918
On April 10, 2006 at 14:19, netarc said...
I thought it wasn't so much the formaldehyde in
the product, as the fiberglass itself, that was
harmful/toxic?

The fibreglass also is a hazard with respect to the dust particles, but so is saw dust or any course dust. Stating the obvious, formaldehyde is a proven carcinogen, so you may want to avoid or protect yourself from this stuff. The best cancer treament is to avoid, whenever possible, known carcinogens.

I would suggest that you also wear a dust mask when working with the UltraTouch insulation to protect yourself from product dust as well as inhaling the fire retardent that's been sprayed on the product. I do not know if the fire retardent would cause much of a health problem, but less crap in your lungs the better.

In addition, you have to like the no VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) and Formaldehyde features of the UltraTouch product.
Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
Post 12 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 16:50
Mr. Stanley
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2006
16,954
On April 10, 2006 at 16:31, FRR said...
The fibreglass also is a hazard with respect to
the dust particles, but so is saw dust or any
course dust. I do not know if the fire retardent
would cause much of a health problem, but less
crap in your lungs the better.

There was a big artickle in a general contractors mag a few years ago, about how the insulation mfgrs. have been trying cover - up and dismiss the medical findings about the dangers of Fiberglass. The findings were / are that, loose fiberglass particles are about as bad as asbestos & causing lung cancer. Once the fiberglass fibers get into the lungs, they get wedged in there and are really, really nasty stuff.
"If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger."
Frank Lloyd Wright
Post 13 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 16:58
cma
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
August 2003
3,044
On April 10, 2006 at 16:31, FRR said...
The fibreglass also is a hazard with respect to
the dust particles, but so is saw dust or any
course dust.

I would suggest that you also wear a dust mask
when working with the UltraTouch insulation to
protect yourself from product dust as well as
inhaling the fire retardent that's been sprayed
on the product. I do not know if the fire retardent
would cause much of a health problem, but less
crap in your lungs the better.

In addition, you have to like the no VOC (Volatile
Organic Compound) and Formaldehyde features of
the UltraTouch product.

Fire retardant used:

"The fireproofing is boric acid, which is obtained from minerals mined in deserts in California and elsewhere. This is the same fireproofing used in our cellulose insulation. Borates are very low-toxic to humans and other mammals."

I think the original poster was mostly iritated by the fiberglass issue, itchy skin, get it in your eyes, breathing in the particles of glass.. Formaldehyde is a big issue but is pretty much in every home product out there today. Formaldehyde is released as a gas so a typical dust mask won't protect you from it. Here is a list of all the day to day stuff that it is in:

[Link: allergies.about.com]
Post 14 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 20:22
Ted Wetzel
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2001
879
On April 10, 2006 at 16:50, Mr. Stanley said...
|

There was a big artickle in a general contractors
mag a few years ago, about how the insulation
mfgrs. have been trying cover - up and dismiss
the medical findings about the dangers of Fiberglass.
The findings were / are that, loose fiberglass
particles are about as bad as asbestos & causing
lung cancer. Once the fiberglass fibers get into
the lungs, they get wedged in there and are really,
really nasty stuff.

there appears to be a pretty clear distinction between the damage caused by asbestos and fiberglass. fiberglass is definately "safe" by comparison when installed properly. The problem is that it's never installed properly and the HVAC systems in the houses we work in are never sealed properly. Everytime the air handler turns on you're getting faceful of fiberglass dust.
Post 15 made on Monday April 10, 2006 at 20:23
AnthonyZ
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2005
1,987
You guys don't like R13? I love the stuff! I remember when I was little my folks would take me to the carnival and we'd watch the man spin a stick in his machine and, Voila! The greatest, sweetest treat ever!

Now I get to crawl around in attics full of the stuff!

You guys are crazy. Oh well, just means more for me.
"Just when I thought that I was out they pull me back in"
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse