Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
Broadband fallback
This thread has 6 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Wednesday March 22, 2006 at 18:04
dcci
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
November 2003
198

Hello all. I have prospective clients for whom their home data network is very important - they're hedge fund managers that occasionally work from home. They've indicated that they must have both DSL and a cable modem, such that if one goes down, they can keep rolling.

My background is actually in enterprise telecom, but it's been a long while. Any idea of products or approaches for this? I'd prefer to steer clear of corporate gear (Cisco, etc.), but if that's what it takes, so be it. Ideally, it would be a router that would allow connecting two broadband feeds, with the ability to define one as primary, with some sort of fallover to the other broadband feed if the primary fails.

Am I dreaming? Anyone tackled this for a residence?

And yes, this is also posted at IP, in the verified section
Post 2 made on Wednesday March 22, 2006 at 18:16
Chad Otis
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2003
226
Ironicly I was just looking on Linksys' website at some VPN stuff and saw this model. model #: RV042 under business section. It is also available in 8 and 16 port configs. It has dual internet connections for redundancy/load balancing.
Post 3 made on Wednesday March 22, 2006 at 18:20
ceied
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
5,754
i'd use cisco stuff...not linksys
Ed will be known as the Tiger Woods of the integration business, followed closely with the renaming of his company to "Hotties A/V". The tag line will be "We like big racks and tight holes"...
Post 4 made on Wednesday March 22, 2006 at 18:46
tsvisser
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2002
1,228
Cisco 1800 dual WAN plus analog phone modem backup (very nice feature)
Xincom XC-DPG603 dual WAN
Xincom XC-DPG602 dual WAN
Xincom XC-DPG503 dual WAN
Xincom XC-DPG502 dual WAN
Linksys RV016 configureable WAN ports for super redundancy, but poor load balancing
Linksys RV082 dual WAN
Planet XRT-402D dual WAN
[Link: imdb.com]
Post 5 made on Thursday March 23, 2006 at 02:09
BigPapa
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
3,139
Bam!
Post 6 made on Thursday March 23, 2006 at 08:36
ceied
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2002
5,754
ok i have a question for someone smarter than me, ok low threshold but seriuosly...

can you take 3 cisco 1800 to have 4 internet connections?

first cisco 1800 say 1 for dsl, 1 for cable 2nd cisco 1800 1 for sat internet and 1 for t1 or fiber

the 3 rd would combine all 4 modems


just wondering if it can be done

ed
Ed will be known as the Tiger Woods of the integration business, followed closely with the renaming of his company to "Hotties A/V". The tag line will be "We like big racks and tight holes"...
Post 7 made on Thursday March 23, 2006 at 17:47
tsvisser
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2002
1,228
This certainly can be done, but with a whole boatloads of caveats that I'm simply not prepared to answer. Cisco networks are handled by an associate of mine. The last time we did a 4 WAN feed network, I think that they either used 4 individual PIX style security appliances or a couple of Xircom pieces w/ much of the routing simply passed through to a large Cisco carrier class router.

I plug and play and do a bit of web management on my own stuff, but am lost when it comes to more advanced situations. The Linksys RV016 is capable of supporting 8 WAN ports, I believe, where the ports are configureable within the webserver as to their up/down implementation

From what I can glean, the complicated part comes into play when you use multiple WANs and manage load balancing AND the ability to establish secure connections between LAN clients and a secure WAN host. i.e. the ability to write rules for such negotiation and either force single WAN port access for the rest of the session (likely) or write global rules that are applied to all WAN ports? (less likely, and also potentially defeating some security measures?) Using a manged switch, trunking off a few VLANS with dedicated WAN ports is one thing, but to provide anything above 2 WAN ports for a single LAN is beyong me, something I'm curious about, but also something I will probably never really need to know an answer to.
[Link: imdb.com]


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse