On February 28, 2006 at 02:28, JBJ SYSTEMS said...
there are baluns for this...FYI...maybe they are
not technically "baluns" but they accept coax
and give you terminals for twisted pair...available
at ADI specifically for this purpose.
What brand? What are they if not baluns? If a product accepts coax and gives me terminals for twisted pair, nothing about that says that it will pass DC.
And, in general,
baluns are expected to respond to the lowest frequencies in the audio spectrum, but not to DC.
even the term "twisted pair" is used to refer to the noise rejection characteristics of a cable pair carrying...alternating current of some type, not DC.
The issue still is that if a product is designed for audio and/or video, ther is no reason to design it or build it to pass DC.
With no DC current, the phone company thinks your phone is hung up. When you go off hook, a current in the neighborhood of 15 mA flows, doing two things:
telling the phone company computer you are off hook, which they respond to by sending you a dial tone, and
providing DC voltage and current to operate the phone. Even if the phone is a modern powered one, the voltage referred to in phone lingo as "battery" must be present for the phone to work.
That first reason is why a balun, which probably looks like a short circuit at DC, would make your phone look constantly busy. Baluns can be made, for more money, NOT to look like a short, but why would a manufacturer raise their product cost and hence selling price for DC, which is not part of an audio or video signal?