Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Video Amp?
This thread has 15 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Saturday February 4, 2006 at 02:06
JRock
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
116
I have 3 modulated channels combined with RF out from sat receiver. This currently feeds 3 TVs (will possibly be adding 2-3 in the future). All coax runs are rg6, under 60'. My modulated channels are comming from 3 seperate modulators with a 20db out. Modulated channels goto 3-way splitter, 3-way into 2-way to combine with satellite, then to TVs. Do I need a video amp? Any other input/advise would be appreciated. Thanks in advance...

-J
Post 2 made on Saturday February 4, 2006 at 04:34
Jay In Chicago
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
1,658
Always use variable gain modulators for a start.

And I doubt you should need an amp if the work is done properly. What splitter/combiners are you using?

How many runs?
Jet Rack ... It's what's for breakfast
Post 3 made on Saturday February 4, 2006 at 08:50
Wire Nuts
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2005
611
How do the pictures look? Any funky lines or waves or such? If not, you should be all good. Just remember, a modulator is only RF out so video quality will be fair at best.
Post 4 made on Saturday February 4, 2006 at 08:55
BigPapa
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
3,139
J, hopefully those modulators have attenuation. Looks like you did it right, but I'm wondering if it's going to be a hot signal.

Make sure you have a few channels separation between each mod. channel, that may help.
OP | Post 5 made on Saturday February 4, 2006 at 17:17
JRock
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
116
Thanks for your replies...

I have 3 CE Labs 1 ch modulators (1001F). I went with these mainly because they were cheap! Much cheaper than buying a 3 ch modulator. I will probably upgrade in the future when I want more channels. There is currently 3 runs, I will be adding 2-3 more soon. All spliters/combiners are Regal 1000mhz (Left over from when I used to install cable modems!). The picture was fine when I just had 1 modulator. Once I added the other 2 I got a vertical wavey line going across the screen on all 3 channels. Channels are set 1 apart (121, 123, 125). Should I add a filter? I didn't think I needed one since I wasn't combing the channels with others. Thanks again for your help.

-J
Post 6 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 08:57
Wire Nuts
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2005
611
Sounds like a hot signal. Play with modulator outputs by adjusting them down. If no adjustment is available, try putting a 3 to 6db pad on the output.
That vertical line showing up after you added the other 2 modulators leads me to believe you may be on a channel that may have some cable data or digital video moving on it.
So try experimenting with other channels. I have even broken them up so that one channel would be on ch 42, another on ch 88 and another on ch 124.
Post 7 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 10:25
AnthonyZ
Select Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2005
1,987
Seperation of channels is a must. While I can understand the use of cheap mod's I wouldn't recommend it. Service calls are more expensive than the mod's in the long run.
"Just when I thought that I was out they pull me back in"
Post 8 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 11:10
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On February 4, 2006 at 02:06, JRock said...
Do I need a video amp?

To this point you have not suggested that you are having any problems. More info would be good. And you don't mean a video amp, because if there is a channel, it is RF, not video.

On February 4, 2006 at 17:17, JRock said...
Thanks for your replies...

The picture was fine
when I just had 1 modulator.

Aha! A problem to solve!

Once I added the
other 2 I got a vertical wavey line going across
the screen on all 3 channels. Channels are set
1 apart (121, 123, 125).

The other guys are right -- this sounds like too much signal. Each modulator puts out a particular amount of power, and when you add modulators, you pump more power into the TV inputs, even though each channel is not at any hotter a power level than it was before.

It also sounds like the channels are too close together. Until a few years ago, million dollar modulators (commercial TV stations) did not dare leave less than one channel between one another. It would be truly amazing if you could always get away with such close spacing with a modulator (your own little TV stations) that undoubtedly lack a commercial TV station's strict frequency and bandwidth performance.

Should I add a filter?

Please suggest what kind of filter you are thinking of, and to do what. I don't get it.

I didn't think I needed one since I wasn't combing
the channels with others.

You mean combining, right? If you are not combining these channels with others, why are they at such high frequencies? Try lower frequencies, UHF 14, 18, 22 or cable 65, 69, 73 (same frequencies, almost). Again, more info is needed...do you also distribute a cable signal, and you had to go that high to find unoccupied channels?
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
OP | Post 9 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 16:19
JRock
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
116
Thannks again for all your replies. I am not distributing any cable. Just satellite, which is being modulated to channel 3 by the sat receiever. The reason I put the channels so high and close together is because I don't have the remote for my kitchen LCD. This way the channels are easily accessed using the channel up/down on the TV. If I try using the automatic channel tune feature on this TV (to remove channels with no picture), it keeps every channel! I will try adding pads and seperating the channels some more.

As far as a filter goes, I have read that when modulating channels you must use a low pass or notch filter. From my understanding these are only needed when combining with existing cable channels, right? Do I still need one just to make sure the channels are clean before adding my own?

The main reason I asked about a RF amp (thanks for correcting me Ernie) is because everything I have read about distributing video over coax has said to use them. I just wasn't sure is they were needed since all my runs are under 60'.

Thanks again. You have all been very helpful...

-J
Post 10 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 18:34
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On February 5, 2006 at 16:19, JRock said...
Thannks again for all your replies. I am not
distributing any cable. Just satellite, which
is being modulated to channel 3 by the sat receiever.

Okay. That makes total sense.

The reason I put the channels so high and close
together is because I don't have the remote for
my kitchen LCD. This way the channels are easily
accessed using the channel up/down on the TV.
If I try using the automatic channel tune feature
on this TV (to remove channels with no picture),
it keeps every channel! I will try adding pads
and seperating the channels some more.

INFO INFO INFO DON'T YOU GET THAT WE CAN ONLY HELP YOU IF YOU TELL US WHAT FREEKIN EQUIPMENT YOU ACTUALLY HAVE ? ? ? ? ? ? ??? ??

Okay, now that I have stopped twitching:
I can go down to the local drug store and get something for this cough, and while I am there I can spend ten dollars and get a little remote that will operate any one of thousands of models of television! It might take up to twenty or thirty dollars to get one with an actual MENU button on it for programming your TV, but that depends on the TV.

By the way, if you autoprogram a TV and no signals are present, many TVs will simply leave all channels programmed. You HAVE done this with all signals present, right?

As far as a filter goes, I have read that when
modulating channels you must use a low pass or
notch filter. From my understanding these are
only needed when combining with existing cable
channels, right?

Right. If your cable distribution system is not hooked up to cable or an antenna, there will be no need for a filter.

The main reason I asked about a RF amp (thanks
for correcting me Ernie)

I'll have to show that quote to my wife next time I correct her about something. Thank you for taking it so well.

is because everything
I have read about distributing video over coax
has said to use them. I just wasn't sure is they
were needed since all my runs are under 60'.

Amps are necessary if the signal levels get too low. I bet "everything" gives some conditions about when to use them. With analog TV, snow is an indication that you need an amp (or that you are mixing cable and modulated signal and the cable is goosing your signal with noise).
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 11 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 18:35
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On February 5, 2006 at 18:34, Ernie Bornn-Gilman said...
I'll have to show that quote to my wife next time
I correct her about something. Thank you for
taking it so well.

I meant TRY to correct her, patient soul that she is.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 12 made on Sunday February 5, 2006 at 18:36
Ernie Bornn-Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
Ah, hell, I'm posting every couple of minutes like Mr. Stanley did for a while!
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
OP | Post 13 made on Monday February 6, 2006 at 00:02
JRock
Long Time Member
Joined:
Posts:
October 2005
116
LOL... Thanks again. You have been very helpful...

I am here to learn, I appreciate when someone takes the time to answer my question or correct me if I am wrong.

The TV in question is a Samsung 17" LCD (LTM1775W). I have tried 3 or 4 universal remotes and none of them work that TV. Samsung parts wants $50 for the remote.

Anyway, I seperated the channels more (115, 120, 125) and the picture quality improved some. I still get the vertical line, but its not as bad. The auto program now works too. And yes, all signals were connected when I did it the first time! Is there any benefit to the channels being lower? Since the auto program is now working, it doesn't really matter where the channels are.

-J
Post 14 made on Wednesday February 8, 2006 at 19:16
mcn779
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2003
1,070
I used the Channel Plus and it worked like a charm especially being able to do IR over the COAX.

Marc
Post 15 made on Wednesday February 8, 2006 at 21:07
Mr. Stanley
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
January 2006
16,954
On February 5, 2006 at 18:36, Ernie Bornn-Gilman said...
Ah, hell, I'm posting every couple of minutes
like Mr. Stanley did for a while!

Yeah, well I've slowed a bit since my Ritalin ran out!!!
"If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger."
Frank Lloyd Wright
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse