Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Previous page Next page Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Page 1 of 2
Topic:
Does the URC MX-890 work with the MRF-250 RF base station
This thread has 15 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Tuesday June 6, 2017 at 04:47
cgroth
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
475
Hi, I have an Home Theatre set up for use with my old MX-3000 remote, using the MRF-250 RF base station for my hidden equipment. I am looking at getting an MX-890 hard button remote, and I am wondering whether this will work with the old MRF-250 base station?

Best
Christopher
Post 2 made on Tuesday June 6, 2017 at 08:47
burtont62
Active Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2011
591
Yes.
Post 3 made on Tuesday June 6, 2017 at 08:50
FreddyFreeloader
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2004
3,243
It will but with possible slightly more limited range and interference succeptibility. Since it's your personal setup I say go for it and see if it's passable in its current environment. You might be surprised.
Post 4 made on Tuesday June 6, 2017 at 20:44
brucewayne
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2006
895
Yes if you are using an emitter . If you are using a ir in on the back then no.
brucewayne
Post 5 made on Tuesday June 6, 2017 at 22:40
Fins
Elite Member
Joined:
Posts:
June 2007
11,627
Good luck getting a 250 to work. Try removing the antenna. But even that is a long shot.
Civil War reenactment is LARPing for people with no imagination.

OP | Post 6 made on Wednesday June 7, 2017 at 04:04
cgroth
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
475
On June 6, 2017 at 22:40, Fins said...
Good luck getting a 250 to work. Try removing the antenna. But even that is a long shot.

Hi, my 250 works perfectly with my MX-3000 (and it has done so in at least 5 or 6 different homes I have lived in, sometime with the antenna, sometimes without). My question now was only if the MX-890 would work with the 250. Unless the RF transmitter in the 890 is weaker than the 3000, then I should be OK?
Post 7 made on Friday June 9, 2017 at 10:13
tomciara
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
May 2002
7,962
You should be fine. I did a 990 with the old base station just this week. I was ready to swap it out, but the new remote was working fine with the old base station, so I left it.

There are plenty of bad vibes for the 250 and 260 base stations here. I think it can be accurately said that it depends on the installation and the interference in your particular area. In certain metropolitan areas and in certain installations, there is just more interference, and the 350 base station is the solution. In my particular area I have never had unresolvable issues with the 250 and 260.

You should be fine.
There is no truth anymore. Only assertions. The internet world has no interest in truth, only vindication for preconceived assumptions.
Post 8 made on Friday June 9, 2017 at 11:29
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
The problems with the 250 and 260 have to do with too much RF sensitivity. Other devices that use the same frequencies can block the intended transmissions. In the US, these might work great in rural settings but not work at all in areas of dense population.

I see you're in Oslo, which adds a nice twist to your situation. Approved RF frequencies vary from nation to nation, and there's every possibility that there simply are no devices on the same frequency as your remotes. In general you can expect that if your base station is working on one URC remote, it will work on others.

Of course, if you have doubts right out of the box, I hope you have confirmation from URC that this remote model is supposed to work with that base station.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
Post 9 made on Friday June 9, 2017 at 11:58
SB Smarthomes
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
2,634
Don't forget that some of the URC products including the MX-890 & MRF units are also available in a different frequency (433 instead of 418) and are differentiated with the "i" on the end of the part number.

I've never used the 433MHz devices so don't really if they solve any problems, but the manual does state that you need to match the remote with the base station.

Christopher - If you do buy the MX-890 make sure to check the model number on your MRF-250 to ensure that you purchase the correct remote.
www.sbsmarthomes.com
Santa Barbara Smarthomes
OP | Post 10 made on Saturday June 10, 2017 at 10:21
cgroth
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
475
thanks for all your advice! found an mrf350 so I should be ok either way. not going for the i solution. 🤓
OP | Post 11 made on Tuesday June 13, 2017 at 03:33
cgroth
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
475
On June 6, 2017 at 20:44, brucewayne said...
Yes if you are using an emitter . If you are using a ir in on the back then no.

Hi, what does this mean? I am using an MRF-250 with my MX-3000 and everything works perfectly, however when using my MX-900 the MRF-250 appears to respond to the the RF signal whenever I push a button on the remote (it lights up), but the cable box does not respond. (The cable box does respond to the IR command fro the MX-900 to the IR code should be correct)

There is no emitter on the cable box, I use the IR blaster for this (and this works fine with the MX-3000). Could the MX-990 or CCP somehow refuse to trigger the blaster, even when receiving an RF signal? Could that be the reson for the different behaviour?

Confused Chris
OP | Post 12 made on Tuesday June 13, 2017 at 13:52
cgroth
Founding Member
Joined:
Posts:
April 2002
475
Seems to be working now. Strange, but it seems the signal was too strong. Don't see how that can be, since the signal comes from the MRF-250, nit the remote, but no problem from the MX-3000, only from the MX-900...
Post 13 made on Tuesday June 13, 2017 at 15:54
brucewayne
Advanced Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2006
895
Some equipment like denon avr's have a Ir in on the back. Which u would use a mono 3.5 cable. The 250 was notorious for not working with those.
brucewayne
Post 14 made on Tuesday June 13, 2017 at 15:57
goldenzrule
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
July 2007
8,474
The 250 is a turd. Interference up the ying yang and 2.5mm emitter ports. Pretty much the only RF base on earth with 2.5mm emitter ports.
Post 15 made on Wednesday June 14, 2017 at 01:41
Brad Humphrey
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
February 2004
2,593
On June 13, 2017 at 15:57, goldenzrule said...
The 250 is a turd. Interference up the ying yang and 2.5mm emitter ports. Pretty much the only RF base on earth with 2.5mm emitter ports.

??? There were lots of cheap RF base stations that used 2.5mm instead of the standard 3.5mm.
Old Harmony hubs
Old OneForAll hubs
Old IR Pyramid repeaters
etc...

Agree the MRF-250 was a turd. Never had an RF base station give me so many problems as those old POS.
Page 1 of 2


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse