Your Universal Remote Control Center
RemoteCentral.com
Custom Installers' Lounge Forum - View Post
Previous section Next section Up level
Up level
The following page was printed from RemoteCentral.com:

Login:
Pass:
 
 

Topic:
Zone two output split. One stereo. One summed mono.
This thread has 7 replies. Displaying all posts.
Post 1 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 07:06
Craig Aguiar-Winter
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
1,489
I'm running a second zone for fellow. It will have two crown amps. A CDI2000 for his top end and an XLS2502 for the sub. The XLS will only accept a mono signal through input one when you bridge it.

My plan is to split the RCA output. One pair will go into a Cleanbox Pro and then to the CDi2000, the other will be summed mono per this article:

[Link: rane.com]

And then fed to the sub.

My question is will there be any nagative side affects to having the signal split, and one pair being summed mono while the other remains stereo?

Is there another circuit I should build that sums the pair to mono but also allows for the use of the original stereo signal?

Thanks.

Craig.
My wife says I can't do sarcasm. She says I just sound like an a$$hole.
Post 2 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 10:18
highfigh
Loyal Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2004
8,322
On November 17, 2016 at 07:06, Craig Aguiar-Winter said...
I'm running a second zone for fellow. It will have two crown amps. A CDI2000 for his top end and an XLS2502 for the sub. The XLS will only accept a mono signal through input one when you bridge it.

My plan is to split the RCA output. One pair will go into a Cleanbox Pro and then to the CDi2000, the other will be summed mono per this article:

[Link: rane.com]

And then fed to the sub.

My question is will there be any nagative side affects to having the signal split, and one pair being summed mono while the other remains stereo?

Is there another circuit I should build that sums the pair to mono but also allows for the use of the original stereo signal?

Thanks.

Craig.

The resistor network works but by the time you assemble the parts and close it up, you could have bought this-

[Link: edcorusa.com]
My mechanic told me, "I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder."
Post 3 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 11:56
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
Read the rane article before you read the rest of this. It covers every detail of splitting and summing.

On November 17, 2016 at 07:06, Craig Aguiar-Winter said...
I'm running a second zone for fellow. It will have two crown amps. A CDI2000 for his top end and an XLS2502 for the sub.

Not mentioned here is the crossover for the sub, nor the method of calibrating the sub output level with the high end output level.

The XLS will only accept a mono signal through input one when you bridge it.

That's true for any amp when it's bridged. I'm just sayin.'

My plan is to split the RCA output.

The rane article clearly states you can just use a simple Y for that. So you now have two wires to go to the stereo amp and two wires to go to the sub. In fact you can split to more than two amps, but anyone who needs to do that should ask about it.

(From here on in, when I say "source" here, I mean whatever feeds the next stage of the system.) You don't mention what your signal source is, but your post makes me think it's unbalanced.

One pair will go into a Cleanbox Pro

Theoretically necessary, in practice not at all, unless you're running a hundred feet from the source to the amp. Even then I've had success without such a device.

In practice, you connect the hot lead of the unbalanced channel to the + of the amp input and connect the ground lead of the channel to both the - and the ground of the amp input. We do this every time we connect a consumer unit to a balanced input on commercial systems and we never have noise problems.
Never.

Re the sub:
the other will be summed mono per this article:

[Link: rane.com]

EXACTLY. Connect your unbalanced signals to the circuit shown in Figure 2 (or balanced per Figure 1).  If using Figure 2, connect the source hot lead to the + of the sub amp and the source ground to the - and ground of the sub amp. If using Figure 1, connect to +, - and ground of the amp.

My question is will there be any negative side affects to having the signal split, and one pair being summed mono while the other remains stereo?

No. Well, almost not. Since the Crown has an input impedance in the 20K range, I'd use 1K resistors in that network, but it will definitely work as shown. Those resistors might reduce the stereo separation from, say, 60 dB to 30 dB. That reduction of separation is probably inaudible. To hear it, you'd have to be able to tell if a signal at, say, -30dB in one channel is at -30dB or -60dB in the other channel, all while music is playing in both channels.

Is there another circuit I should build that sums the pair to mono but also allows for the use of the original stereo signal?

There are lots of other circuits that will accomplish the same thing, but there's no circuit you should build to do so. It's not necessary and won't improve things.
Thanks.

Craig.

Sure!
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
OP | Post 4 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 13:37
Craig Aguiar-Winter
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
1,489
Thanks Ernie.

I read the Rane article. I wasn't aware the lack of stereo separation wouldn't be very noticeable. This is a very big garage so that won't be too big of a deal anyway. Loud and clear is more important.

The source is Zone 2 unbalanced from a Marantz preamp.

The amps will be balanced with the front panel level controls and the master volume is controlled from the preamp. Cross over will likely be at 80hz.

I have never gone unbalanced into the CDi. A long time ago 3peddlemini said he used to go unbalanced in but started using the cleanbox pro to convert to balanced and heard an improvemt in sound quality. For $60 I figured why not.

You recommend replacing the 470 ohm resisters with 1k? Leave the 10k as is?
My wife says I can't do sarcasm. She says I just sound like an a$$hole.
Post 5 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 13:43
kgossen
Super Member
Joined:
Posts:
March 2008
3,026
On November 17, 2016 at 11:56, Ernie Gilman said...
Not mentioned here is the crossover for the sub, nor the method of calibrating the sub output level with the high end output level.

Because he provided the model of the sub amp anybody with half a brain could easily Google it to see it has a crossover and gain control!! Imagine that.....
"Quality isn't expensive, it's Priceless!"
Post 6 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 17:11
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
a) for my free consulting time he could have written "the XLS2502 sub amp." Yes, that's right, please not only give the model number but also give a brief description if it's not any kind of specialty device.
b)my answers work for him as well as for anyone using a normal power amp, not just an amp designed to power a sub.

I almost commented that my answer was so long because I see this site as building a reference source, not just answering individual questions. I think it was worthwhile to point out the need for a crossover anyway. He's balancing it by ear, but that's good enough for most of us!
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw
OP | Post 7 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 19:16
Craig Aguiar-Winter
Senior Member
Joined:
Posts:
September 2002
1,489
I said "xls2502 for the sub". I felt that clearly meant it was the sub amp.

Didn't think cross overs etc were relevant to my wanting a mono input.

Thanks again for all of the info guys. I have what I need to proceed.

Craig.
My wife says I can't do sarcasm. She says I just sound like an a$$hole.
Post 8 made on Thursday November 17, 2016 at 21:04
Ernie Gilman
Yes, That Ernie!
Joined:
Posts:
December 2001
30,104
On November 17, 2016 at 19:16, Craig Aguiar-Winter said...
I said "xls2502 for the sub". I felt that clearly meant it was the sub amp.

I got that you wanted to use it for the sub. I did not get that it had any special circuitry inside it especially for the sub. You could have said you wanted to bridge a CDi2000 and use it for the sub, but in that case crossing over is an issue.

I'm just sayin.' Sometimes it's puzzling being Mr. Literal.
A good answer is easier with a clear question giving the make and model of everything.
"The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." -- G. “Bernie” Shaw


Jump to


Protected Feature Before you can reply to a message...
You must first register for a Remote Central user account - it's fast and free! Or, if you already have an account, please login now.

Please read the following: Unsolicited commercial advertisements are absolutely not permitted on this forum. Other private buy & sell messages should be posted to our Marketplace. For information on how to advertise your service or product click here. Remote Central reserves the right to remove or modify any post that is deemed inappropriate.

Hosting Services by ipHouse